Mafia 101 - Blarney Castle: Return of the Leprechauns - Game Thread

Just got caught up in the game. That night fall really sucked. I was wrong on G obviously, but with nobody posting, the only thing scummy in the thread was G's posting.

My thoughts on IQ were based on the posting between him and G. I am not clearing him I just need to rethink everything.
 
Fozzybear said:
Nobody has brought this up yet...just some food for thought while reading through this whole thing. I'm going to be looking very hard at wiz this round. Is there any reason you referred to the scum as "we"?
Click to expand...

Really? You are right in there with the rest of us for D1 banter, then disappear, then come back with this?

I thought you said you had followed a lot of these games. It is common knowledge that we (we=Town) tend to eliminate innocents early in the game more often than the scum do.
 
jbradt said:
I went back and looked through Wiz's posts. Let me vent for a sec: It sucks to have to scroll through every page looking for posts when the thread search tool isn't working properly. Throws off my whole research strategy. Thanks. I'm better now.

Night one vote count. Wiz is on O3T coincidentally.





Wiz calls out Fozzy for not answering the question.

Wiz votes O3T. Late.

How are you feeling about Fozzy now, Wiz. Is he a suspect?

Vote count night 2, showing Wiz's position on O3T.



How are you feeling about IQ now Wiz? You were awful hard after G. This post seems to imply that the info you need on IQ is somehow linked to G being scum. Where do you stand here?

You're right about this. I think we had a misunderstanding between "answering the question" and "answering the question satisfactorily." I will admit that it sucks reading the game from my phone.

Again, I have to agree. My thought that you were following was flawed. But the research ended up in this post, so I'm ok with it.

Night 3 vote count. Wiz was pretty proud of being first on G a little bit ago. And Wiz, you did go hard after G. I'm trying to figure out if you're ballsy enough as scum to push that hard for someone.



So, to sum up... I have to relax on Wiz a bit. I am definitely interested in responses to what I've posted above, but I'm in no way as settled on Wiz as a suspect as I thought I would be at this point.

I'm going to move on to Driver, but I'm going to get something to eat first. Finding driver's posts should be fun... freaking search...
Click to expand...

In response to where I stand on fozzy, I am not sure. I was convinced that G and IQ were the remaining scum. G flipping town took everything I "knew" and flushed it down the toilet.

I took his slowing down as being new. Most noobs tend to back down a little when the banter ends and the game begins.

However, we cannot dismiss any suspects at this point. Labby said that both shamrocks were used tonight. That means there is a 50% chance that we are now looking for 3 instead of 2 scummy bastages.

On the other hand, one of them may have been turned innocent. There was no mention either way in the nightfall write up.

Labby, can you confirm if the turn actually went through?
 
These long days are wearing me down. I will start from scratch tomorrow and see what I can find. I will check before work in case anyone asks any questions of me that need answered.
 
jbradt said:
Driver... not a lot to go on at all, but I have to be honest here; nothing helps take away the suspicion.

The part of this post that is interesting to me is the last bit. Driver actually asked a questions. Good for you, dude! But no follow up, no further mention of it at all. Seems odd.


Driver reluctantly votes O3T. He says later on that he didn't think the slip was a slip. I don't think I can believe that.

Part of what really bothers me about Driver is the antagonistic attitude. Also... care to say any more about your gut feel? Is that person still alive? Maybe if you posted a couple times with original thoughts that others could understand without having to pull out the "gibberish to english" dictionary, you'd be able to entice some people to listen to your gut feeling. But if you're not gonna try, then quit complaining.

More antagonism. More nonsense. Tell me, Driver... when have you seen a doc save an evil? I've seen them put protection on evils, but there's generally nothing to save them from. Please let me know how this makes any sense at all...


More antagonistic crap with no explanation whatsoever. If you really are a townie, you get the trophy for dragging us down.



Really? Come on, Driver. Any real input at all? Do you have any real way to help or are you just trying to keep the bs rolling? It's time to either help or get out of the way.

At this point, I have to view Driver's game as that of a disgruntled leprechaun. Why would a townie be so grumpy. Unless... are you constipated, Driver?

This is where my vote will likely fall barring
Click to expand...

Thanks for that, I needed a laugh right now. Sharks hockey is making me mad hockey right now.
 
Zaffy said:
Thanks for that, I needed a laugh right now. Sharks hockey is making me mad hockey right now.
Click to expand...

What exactly are we laughing at?

Sent from my MB865 using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
 
Oh... Lol. Can't see the bold on my phone.

Sent from my MB865 using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
 
the wizard said:
Really? You are right in there with the rest of us for D1 banter, then disappear, then come back with this?

I thought you said you had followed a lot of these games. It is common knowledge that we (we=Town) tend to eliminate innocents early in the game more often than the scum do.
Click to expand...

Wow, this is a little aggro isn't it? I've posted on every game day, explained my votes, answered the questions I've been asked to the best of my ability and now that I've noticed something that nobody else has talked about you start accusing me of noobishness? "I thought you said you had followed a lot of these games." the fact of the matter is that grammatically "Maybe the scum are pleased with the vote count? We do have a tendency to take ourselves out." odoes directly infer that the "we" (pronoun) refers to the "scum" (antecedent) since there are no other nouns between them. Now, we can talk all we want about me being new and having not blabbered on about things I didn't have an opinion about yesterday, or we can talk about what I have an opinion about today, you called yourself scum, now you are awe-full defensive about it and attacking my experience in the game despite the fact that I did notice something that makes total logical and grammatical sense, (I can't stop thinking of the phrase Ad Hominem, isn't that a type of logical fallacy?) I would say that the burden of proof is on you.
 
odoes = typo = does* I didn't want to edit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
AquariaCentral.com
Top Bottom