Mafia 104 - Dawg the Bounty Hunter - The Play
- Thread starter dirtydawg10
- Start date
Usually I'd lean the UD to be a townie, but since Bally is a semi-chronic UDer it's more complicated than that.
I wasn't trying to imply Bally was innocent rather I was explaining why I thought Dawg implemented the rule in the first place.
Well now... I reread the game with the current known folks in min, but the only thing I can think of that's changed from my point of view is that Neph was sincere... an that doesn't guarantee correctness. DD being a Towny PR mean that she was honest on her thoughts about me and not trying to get a reaction. I didn't suspect her at all anyway (though I did inquire an think about what would be if she was evil). I still think that Rich's Vote/Post comment was a slip up when working with Bally, but I'm also thinking that Dun has been completely useless so far, and that he changed his mind about his actions way to quickly. I think he may have been advised to do so by the scum team (making him scum).
Just putting those thoughts out there. Also, I think that Kashta is playing an abnormal game, as she has targeted two people who are liable to crack already, and has been short tempered (or I think she has) since the game started.
Just putting those thoughts out there. Also, I think that Kashta is playing an abnormal game, as she has targeted two people who are liable to crack already, and has been short tempered (or I think she has) since the game started.
Pappy, sorry I didn't answer this before. I must have gone to the next page because I didn't see this.
It was just the one post mentioning Neph in particular where Rich basically excuses Neph for his play when others questioned Neph's allegiance for it. And it stuck in my mind for a couple of reasons.... but mainly because that is generally consistent Rich's attitude about vets picking on noobs/and such in a lot of games. He lightly defended AAF too, and he is strongly convinced that I was trying to set Pir up. In each case, again, Rich is consistent about his opinion. So that's why I didn't fault him for it.
It was just the one post mentioning Neph in particular where Rich basically excuses Neph for his play when others questioned Neph's allegiance for it. And it stuck in my mind for a couple of reasons.... but mainly because that is generally consistent Rich's attitude about vets picking on noobs/and such in a lot of games. He lightly defended AAF too, and he is strongly convinced that I was trying to set Pir up. In each case, again, Rich is consistent about his opinion. So that's why I didn't fault him for it.
Crapcicles! Just got caught up in the game after getting home. Two more innocents down. The lynch only had 3 votes? holy crap Batman! We are spreading ourselves way to thin on the votes. No wonder the scum don't have to move around to lynch innocents. We are doing it for them. The only good thing is that from here on out, they don't automatically increase their number with the hit. Now it is 50/50 turn/kill. But we still lose another innocent with every hit.
I have had too long a day to dig tonight. I am working tomorrow but will be at the office "on call" hopefully I will have some time to go back through and find something to kick at to find scum.
I have had too long a day to dig tonight. I am working tomorrow but will be at the office "on call" hopefully I will have some time to go back through and find something to kick at to find scum.
Dawg, since Wiz brought it up...does the 50/50 mean guaranteed either a hit or turn OR a 50% success rate and it's still a hit/turn depending on the person chosen.
