Mafia 106: Pokemafia

Also the votes where on AAF where because he had a dumb plan for voting, and all mention of Dawg's dumb vote or my dumb vote are being ignored. It gave Pap the easy play to bumb off a townie, I am sure hes was hoping it was a town PR but either way it was right there waiting to be snatched. He had a bit of a reason, plus it was AAF so he figured it would be an easy one to get away with.
 
Vote Count as far as I make it out (I havn't noted post numbers but this is as best I can make it out - please correct if you get something different)

Coler (2) - dawg, jpappy

Pap (2) - Rich, Neph

Dawg (2) - FF, Metric

Yet to vote : Coler.

Based on how the day has gone I'm most comfortable presently with voting Dawg. Taking on board how pappy is conducting himself I find it difficult not to link him with dawg.

However dawg is posting odd stuff e.g. about there being only 2 scum, which doesn't scan with his endorsement of what he says FF's PM means (the 'James' thing') and to my mind is the stronger suspect.

My other two suspects from earlier were Rich and Metric. I'm seeing it as a three member scum team. I have now have a real sense that Metric might be being coached through the game (low post count but with that tends to post content as opposed to fluff). I strongly question whether their vote on Dawg is actually a final vote and almost expect a change cloaked with the 'did I do bad I'm a newbie' type of conduct. I want to stress that this is pretty lukewarm but its stronger than anything I get by way of suspicion from Rich.

If the other scum is Neph or FF then I've been played like cheap fiddle.
 
OK I've given it as much time as I can tonight.

I wasn't going to make a knee jerk reaction or be seen to vote dawg in direct response to him voting me but, based on the stuff I've posted already during the evening, all of which speaks for itself and is by no means a lengthy or complicated read, I'm voting to lynch Dawg.

For instance I strongly believe we have 3 scum and have to get this vote correct. Any suggestion to the contrary makes my skin crawl. Dawg has been making that sort of suggestion, and his own 'tie-breaker' on me being James is actually entirely inconsistent with that suggestion (that there are only 2 scum). I've made that point and he appears to have no answer for it.

I vote to lynch Dawg


​I have to hit the sack - good luck town ! Be right !
 
Go figure it is the three people actually talking in the thread.

Interesting comment. What is that smell? I'm not sure but it's like a dirty, scummy smell

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3 using the MAN app!
 
OK I've given it as much time as I can tonight.

I wasn't going to make a knee jerk reaction or be seen to vote dawg in direct response to him voting me but, based on the stuff I've posted already during the evening, all of which speaks for itself and is by no means a lengthy or complicated read, I'm voting to lynch Dawg.

For instance I strongly believe we have 3 scum and have to get this vote correct. Any suggestion to the contrary makes my skin crawl. Dawg has been making that sort of suggestion, and his own 'tie-breaker' on me being James is actually entirely inconsistent with that suggestion (that there are only 2 scum). I've made that point and he appears to have no answer for it.

I vote to lynch Dawg


​I have to hit the sack - good luck town ! Be right !
Go figure that I actually read the rules and the Mod said there would be two scum with only nine players. As far as the James thing...I'm not hanging my hat on that. I see an evil drunk delibird give a gift to FF and I see that as pointing to an evil drunk Coler. Unfortunately the Mod has said they are going to be late tonight and we probably won't see clarification on that until after nightfall.
 
AquariaCentral.com