Mafia 2014 #1-- FF1 Simple--The Play
- Thread starter Rbishop
- Start date
My whole problem with FF's story is that he thinks I'm not a lynch target on day 1. There are plenty of games where I've been lynched, or up on the block with others on day one.
How are you going to throw a junk vote at me saying, 'Zaffy defied my authority to be #1, A+ poster of the decade!' (not a direct quote). But, then you claim you voted me because you thought I wouldn't get lynched.
How are you going to throw a junk vote at me saying, 'Zaffy defied my authority to be #1, A+ poster of the decade!' (not a direct quote). But, then you claim you voted me because you thought I wouldn't get lynched.
The general point I was trying to make is stated in the first line of my post. FF's post explaing his vote to Kashta bothered me.
It really is that simple. By posting my thoughts, I figured we could start to generate some game related posting to allow us to have something to dig through looking for scum. I did not, however, think that my post would end up kicking off the FF show.
Most of what got posted was between you and him which, basically defeated my purpose. I had hoped to see more input from others to possibly find inconsistencies. As you stated yourself, it is a numbers game. It is also a small game so we have even less room for error than normal.
Going to be honest, I didn't claim that I picked you specifically because of the "not likely to be lynched day one" thing, that was just another factor into my not waiting on it.
Just want to put this out for people, if this gameplay is my normal gameplay then how is it scummy at all? I'm not saying it proves my innocence, but how does me having my normal gameplay prove my scumminess?
Just because I'm pointing out your inconsistencies, and you have no legitimate rebuttal, doesn't mean I'm scummy. Maybe you should stop trying so hard to appear innocent and actually get your story straight?
Ok then, here is my (entire) story: At the time of the vote I felt that a) I would not be online often enough to follow the game through day 1, which was a misjudgement on my part, and b) that Zaffy was a 'safe' vote because I honestly didn't expect anyone to question a reason for a day 1 vote. Thinking that Zaffy is unlikely to let himself be lynched over a vote like that is not an inconsistency, though explaining my logic behind it is not easy for me to do.
When I was breaking Wizards large quote into sections I missed an ] and it caused the quote to freak out in my post. Attempting to replicate it for UN caused that post to freak out as well. Anything after that is because I build my posts in a separate window as I read the game, and sometimes the 'autosave' brings stuff I hadn't needed into the main post.
Last edited by a moderator:
Wiz, I got your main point. That was pretty obvious. But that last part of the post appeared, to me, to be disingenuous. To imply that anyone who votes for someone who could be helpful as innocent is acting scummy is a very large stretch. Again, that's the only part I took major issue with...
I didn't expect FF to start this up either, but I'm not going to let his odd posting go unnoticed.
FF;
A early vote to not UD seems acceptable to me, but that is clearly not what it has turned out to be. The 9 hour work day also seemed like a weak excuse at the time. As it turned out you have had plenty of time to read and post, well at least post.
In post 50 you say your not worrying, or moving your vote. (Didn't quote the post because it was already screwed up)
Just saying it seems to me you have had plenty of game time to do both.
A early vote to not UD seems acceptable to me, but that is clearly not what it has turned out to be. The 9 hour work day also seemed like a weak excuse at the time. As it turned out you have had plenty of time to read and post, well at least post.
In post 50 you say your not worrying, or moving your vote. (Didn't quote the post because it was already screwed up)
Just saying it seems to me you have had plenty of game time to do both.
