It sounds like your fish have gas...Let's ask the fish and see what they say! "blup, blup, blup; bubble bubble bubble."![]()

It sounds like your fish have gas...Let's ask the fish and see what they say! "blup, blup, blup; bubble bubble bubble."![]()
But you can measure the wind. You can model it. Reproduce it. Predict it with accuracy. It's like saying science can't prove gravity because it can't be seen. Nice theory, until you jump off the roof and gravity busts a rib laughing.
The rest of your statement is basic logic. You can't prove something doesn't exist. That is why the burden of proof is on proving existence. So scientifically speaking, you have to prove ghosts exist, rather then science proving they don't.
Well of course it is rubbish. We already established that you can't prove negative existence. Expecting scientists to prove otherwise would be unrealistic and completely unfair.i actually have many encounters with ghosts almost on daily basics....... so to me they are real. and for a scientist to prove otherwise is just rubbish.... as i/myself can/have seen them...
um science CAN lie.......
actually bally, yes they do.
i love science and Religion but i will never put them in the same catagory. if i ever had to choose b/w one or the other, it would be Religion over science any day. anyways.... back on topic
lol, flag is *alive* i guess, as wind is well... wind. its not see able or smell able ( the stuff you smell in the wind is from trees or what not ) and ghost, i believe science cant prove, unless you prove me wrong otherwise, then science cant prove ghost are *fake*