3 oscars in 60g

psargon

AC Members
Feb 18, 2005
24
1
0
Chicago, Illinois
before you all start yelling, that isn't what i have.
i've never had an oscar but i know someone who's been keeping 3 oscars in a 60g tank for what's been 5 years already...i thought that isn't possible??
 
I would say that anything is possible, but it doesn't make it right. I can't even imagine what it would be like trying to keep that tank clean. :eek:
 
i would think that the oscars would feel very unconfortable for them like what the other person said thats gonna be a messy tankn
 
i haven't seen them in years (literally). he told me that they're around that size though. thats what i don't get. they reached a size of 10-12 inches in that small space...didnt make sense to me, so i wanted to see if it made sense to anyone else
 
It's a myth that fish do not grow to full size in a smaller aquarium. I'm sure those three oscars are just lovin' it in the 60. :dance
 
Three ocars in a 60 gallon tnak doesn't seem that bad. According to "The Complete Aquarium Guide" by Peter W, Scott, he says the maximium stocking level is 1 inch of fish per every 10 square inches of surface area. A 55 gallon tank is 4 feet long by 12 icnhes deep, giving it a surface area of 576 square inches. This means that the maximum (according to the book) is 57.6 inches of fish. Your friend should be easily below this.

The LFS has a lot more fish in their tanks than this, even though they do plan to sell them. But still, many of the large fish that mine has are never sold because they are so overpriced.

Three oscars is a fairly large number for that tank, but not awful.

The book is for all types of fish from zebra danios to the large cichlids. The same book does show a 56 gallon tank with 3 red devils and two very large plecos. Red devils get to be about the same size as those oscars. In addition, the tank shown in the book is almost half filled with rock.
 
i think it is very much possible. i have been keeping only carnivourous fish for years. i found out that a fish could get grow really big if u feed it more. especially if it's on a high protein diet. i've kept a snakehead up to 2ft long in a 4ft by 1.5ft by 1.5 ft tank. of course i transferred it to a much bigger tank now. but wat u said? it is possible... very much possible. p.s. i have never used gravel or plants or any driftwood. thus giving maximum swimming/growing space for the fish.
 
60 gallons is way to cramped for a 3 oscars. Way to cramped. Is it possible to keep 3 oscars in a 60 for 5 years? Absolutely. It is improbable that you won't have aggression problems to the point one dies, but it is certainly not impossible and it does happen. From a bio-load standpoint, it would be almost impossible to keep them in decent conditions from a water quality standpoint. Oscars are very hardy, and can survive a lot problems. I would bet my next paycheck that they all have severe HITH. No doubt in my mind, that they are disfigured with HITH from the poor conditions. Also, someone said above that "it is a myth" that fish get stunted in small tanks. That is not accurate. Oscars get less stunted than many others, however, ask a Discus owner whether a fish can be stunted being in a small tank. Fish release hormones that in concentration stunt growth. All fish do this, but some are more susceptible to the effects (i.e. Discus). Also, the formula qouted in the book referenced above is useless. I can house over 500 1" cardinal tetras in my 180 gallon with no problem. I cannot house 500 inches of large cichlids without severe problems. That formula is irresponsible and innacurate, as is the picture of the 3 red devils in the tiny tank. A lot of people on here give good advice on tank sizes for oscars, but it is not in this thread. If you want to have oscars, you can in any tank you want, but if you want healthy fish in good water conditions, then go by the guidelines most experienced breeders of these fish use.
 
jonathan03 said:
Three ocars in a 60 gallon tnak doesn't seem that bad. According to "The Complete Aquarium Guide" by Peter W, Scott, he says the maximium stocking level is 1 inch of fish per every 10 square inches of surface area. A 55 gallon tank is 4 feet long by 12 icnhes deep, giving it a surface area of 576 square inches. This means that the maximum (according to the book) is 57.6 inches of fish. Your friend should be easily below this.
I know this was touched on but to add some info............
Read the inch per gallon sticky. Fish are NOT 2 dimensional. If you line up 10 inches of neons, thier MASS is still much less than that of a single 10 inch fish. I have heard the inch/gallon rule as CUBIC inches. (I'm just gonna make up some figures)That is, if you put 10 1" neons in a blender, you might get 1 CUBIC inch of mass. If you put a 3" cichlid in the blender, you still get 1 CUBIC inch of mass. That means 10 inches in length for the neons, and 3 inches for the cichlid, are the same mass.
 
AquariaCentral.com