Douglas, I can't put it any more respectfully than this: that long passage you quoted is garbage. No scientist would use their astrophysical theories to make concrete predictions about things like governmental response, % of loss of life on earth, etc. Other than that, the post reeks of paranoia, intentional obfuscation, and amateurism. I can point to specific points of the passage to support each of those claims if you'd like.My question to you is this: If we're sitting here typing about our fish one year from now, will you admit he was wrong, or will you buy whatever "minor complication/computation error" he puts forth as he predicts another apocalyptic event in future years.
