In the April '06 of AFM, an article by Robert Paul Hudson (names sounds familiar...) writes about A. nana "petite" that "As the plant matures and is propagated, new leaf growth may be normal nana size as the mutation is lost."
My question is then, how is the plant classified as "petite"? Simply by the size of the leaf? I have several normal nana with newer growth showing "petite" leaves. If I cut the rhizome to leave only "petite" leaves, then do I have a "petite" nana? I would never do such a thing, but someone could then advertise this as "petite" nana, a person buys it, then it grows regular leaves. Just another point for those looking to buy plants to do research and be sure of what they are getting I guess.
Are other cultivars also as whimsical to keeping their cultivar form?
It certainly is a well written article
My question is then, how is the plant classified as "petite"? Simply by the size of the leaf? I have several normal nana with newer growth showing "petite" leaves. If I cut the rhizome to leave only "petite" leaves, then do I have a "petite" nana? I would never do such a thing, but someone could then advertise this as "petite" nana, a person buys it, then it grows regular leaves. Just another point for those looking to buy plants to do research and be sure of what they are getting I guess.
Are other cultivars also as whimsical to keeping their cultivar form?
It certainly is a well written article