AqAdvisor.com - WEB version of AquAdvisor

Another minor update has been made to the site (Build 2009 09 24).

What's new:
- Reports recommended water temperature for the selected species. If incompatibility is detected, a warning will be displayed.
- Added more Gourami species.
- Added more Corydoras species.
- Added more Tetra species.
- Added more Mbuna species.
- Total number of species in DB has been increased to 227.
- Fixed a bug - After "Remove" button is pressed, % is correctly calculated.

Please try AqAdvisor site and let me know if you have any feedback.
 
This release attempts to handle some of the aggression issues. Please let me know if you don't agree with the result - I'm sure it will require further fine tuning.

What's new for 2009 09 30 build
- Bioload for snails have been adjusted down significantly.
- Some aggression logic have been implemented. This is still work in progress.
- will take into account size differences
- will take into account their natural aggression between their own species and against other species.
- will take into account species that cannot tolerate its own kind within a limited space. Male betta is the first guinea pig in this category.
- will take into account tank space needed if teritorial bottom dwelling breeding pair(s) form. Will handle multiple breeding pairs of different species based on your tank size.
- Added Texas Cichlid
- Added more loach species.
- Added more tetra species.
- Added more barb species.
- Added Salvini Cichlid.
- Split betta species into male and female to handle aggression issue better.
- Algorithm refined for small tanks (under 10g).
- Algorithm detects if the tank is not high enough for selected species.
- "Clear selection" button has been fixed. Previously it was clearing all fields.
- Total number of species in DB has been increased to 235.

Once again, here's the link: AqAdvisor site.
 
Works much better now!

One suggestion for later on though: maybe split the goldfish into two categories - long bodied and short bodied, or common and fancy, or something of the sort.
 
The site is pretty decent for an estimation, I get a couple warnings that I expected (Angelfish co existing/aggressive with tetras) but am lower stocked than I thought I was... 71% in a 55G (before taking into account plants) which is fine with me, since I thought I was overstocked.

One thing I would change is that since (I imagine) a large number of users to the site will be American, you should include the temperature in Fahrenheit as well as Celsius.
 
paperdragon said:
Works much better now!

One suggestion for later on though: maybe split the goldfish into two categories - long bodied and short bodied, or common and fancy, or something of the sort.
Click to expand...

I really don't know much about gold fishes... :frog:

So "common" ones are long bodied and "fancy" ones are the fat ones?
 
abcdefghi said:
The site is pretty decent for an estimation, I get a couple warnings that I expected (Angelfish co existing/aggressive with tetras) but am lower stocked than I thought I was... 71% in a 55G (before taking into account plants) which is fine with me, since I thought I was overstocked.

One thing I would change is that since (I imagine) a large number of users to the site will be American, you should include the temperature in Fahrenheit as well as Celsius.
Click to expand...

Yup, I will have C vs F, inches vs cm, L vs Gallon soon. :cool:
 
yhbae said:
I really don't know much about gold fishes... :frog:

So "common" ones are long bodied and "fancy" ones are the fat ones?
Click to expand...

Pretty much. There's other long-bodied ones, but they all have the same stocking requirements. It's not a major issue though, as you have it set now, it'll just lead people to under stock their fancy goldie tanks, which certainly isn't a bad thing. ;)
 
paperdragon said:
Pretty much. There's other long-bodied ones, but they all have the same stocking requirements. It's not a major issue though, as you have it set now, it'll just lead people to under stock their fancy goldie tanks, which certainly isn't a bad thing. ;)
Click to expand...

The program has the flexibility to handle it so I'd like to correct it if it makes sense. Based on what you just said, I think you are saying given their length, fancy goldfish has LOWER bioload compare to the long-bodied ones?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
AquariaCentral.com
Top Bottom