Attractive doesn't mean better

excuzzzeme

Stroke Survivor '05
Less attractive fish have 'better sperm'


_47971736_guppies-spl.jpg


Colourful males have poorer quality sperm than their drabber counterparts In a study of tropical guppies, scientists have found that the less attractive males have "better sperm". The research revealed that colourful flamboyant-looking males "invest" in their appearance at the expense of their sperm quality. This suggests, the scientists say, that there is a trade-off between different characteristics that help the male to reproduce.

The findings are described in the Royal Society journal Proceedings B. Professor Jonathan Evans from the Centre for Evolutionary Biology at the University of Western Australia carried out the study. He described how his findings supported "sperm competition theory", whereby females mate with several males and the quality and swimming speed of the sperm determine which male fathers the offspring.

Guppies are a particularly useful species in which to study this, because the males engage in two types of reproductive behaviour - courtship displays and non-consensual or "sneak" mating. "Males that predominantly performed sneak matings were less ornamented but had faster swimming sperm than those that predominantly used courtship," explained Professor Evans. He continued in the journal article: "The reproductive advantage enjoyed by attractive males might potentially be offset by the poor performance of their ejaculates during sperm competition."
I guess for guppies, all is not lost if you're an 'ugly duckling'.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science_and_environment/10209169.stm
 
Way over thinking things is what I believe they are doing...
 
i'm with rb on this one.

and to return the way overthinking... how do they know the courting males are more attractive? did they at least do a survey?
 
i'm with rb on this one.

and to return the way overthinking... how do they know the courting males are more attractive? did they at least do a survey?

They quantify it by fin size (area) and pigmentation.

Even though it seems mundane, this is actually very important information to Evolutionary biologists, population ecologists etc...
 
Good thing we aren't banking on the ichthyologists to solve our nation's problems then huh? Kinda funny though, the difference in their mating strategy is basically a matter of rape or consent. Guess the uggos don't have it that great lol.
 
I think the study will have been done on wild populations, rather than inbred aquarium strains.
 
AquariaCentral.com