JMO, but the survey was lacking several key components. While I doubt I personally would use something like this, I do see a market for more inclusive monitors. I wouldn't trust a product to perform water changes on it's schedule, but if I could set it to do them automatically rather than just when it detects problem levels, maybe. So--some advice--instead of concentrating on one model that does 'everything', break it down to smaller models that can include different parameters appropriate to different setups. For example, a planted tank is frequently monitored for a wider variety of parameters than an unplanted community tank. Ditto for an African cichleds tank. This way, the community unplanted tank unit could have just those factors that are important rather than including all the things that might be monitored in a planted community.
Also--it's always disappointing to take a survey and find that the options given are inadequate. Why ask if someone has Fresh/Salt, but not allow them to indicate they have both?
Also--it's always disappointing to take a survey and find that the options given are inadequate. Why ask if someone has Fresh/Salt, but not allow them to indicate they have both?