Not really for a random death but I'd rather have a random death when one of the people was IMO evil then to vote for someone I wasn't sure about. At least this way if I was wrong about either one then hopefully the right person would be taken down.
I don't think on the 1st night a random death is as bad as later in the game. Its hard to find a true evil on night 1.
If I had stayed where I was and LG still voted MM it still would have been a tie. My only mistake was moving my vote before LG solidified her vote.
Your vote wasn't doing any good on Charlie, also an innocent. Why didn't you switch to Ewurm if you're so convinced they are evil?
You seem to sit on 1 person a lot, good plan for distancing. At least you're consistent.It makes it harder to read you.
You're right, my vote was wasted and I was wrong about Charlie. Please review my posts and you'll see that I've stated both those facts. I was not (and am not) convinced yet on ewurm. My vote was placed and sat because I believed in it. I was wrong, yep. You changed your's late and had a definite impact on the game. Woulda, coulda, shoulda, huh? It may be hard to find evil on night one, but you're basically advocating a random vote. So, who are your best suspects now? Feel free to add me.