Biological Badlands...Mafia #8

Had some time this morning before my 1st job and thought I'd bring DD out of the shadows. She is always a hard read because she doesn't post much and doesn't give much info. But if you group everything together you can see a pattern.

She has thrown suspicion on 5 people I either think or know are innocent

Ewurm leaning INNOCENT

MM INNOCENT

Ice INNOCENT

HN leaning INNOCENT

DC leaning INNOCENT



9 hours till Night.

I think folks need to remember that voting early is best for the Town as we can then discuss the concensus. Voting late especially when there are so many candidates on the block is shady to me.

GGF where are you?

Since I see no other candidate that stirs my senses as much, I vote to have Ice genetically tested

why would voting early benefit the town at all as opposed to late voting? I would think the best voting is the thorough study of someone and then placing a secure vote on someone would be best, and that doean't necessarily correlate with early or late voting..... why are you trying to rush votes out there, Z?

Then she questions Z on why place an early vote? Its obvious why, they can be removed and it gets people on the defense. The only reason to hold off voting till the end is so you can strategically place your vote on someone without looking to suspicious.

YIKES!!

Wurm.... it's tough being the new guy, huh

that goes for nmrsco

Mixes up the newbs, LG did too.

Its not adding up. Sure we all have our doubts on Day 1. Fingers get pointed but most of us put a vote on someone early for a response.DD didn't do so. I got jumped because I wanted to take DD out 1st day last game, she tried the same thing.

Right now my list is

KOTD
DD
LG
Sway

I've explained everyone but Sway. I'll get to her tonight.
 
I'd like to know what everyone's opinion is on Guppy please. Guppy has not posted at all yet and it is day 2 now. If she doesn't post before nightfall she will die a mysterious death. Should we just let nature take it's course in her case, or should we vote her out so as not to risk the possibility of losing 3 innocent townies in 1 night, if she happens to be on our side?

I'd also like to hear people's thoughts on Plantling. She has posted very few posts so far and seems to be laying very low. She was also mentioning CS and Mee-Mee both as being suspicious to her, although she did not seem convinced that either were bad and ended up voting for Ewurm. I'm curious to see how everyone else views her and hopefully get some more imput from her as well.
 
I'd like to know what everyone's opinion is on Guppy please. Guppy has not posted at all yet and it is day 2 now. If she doesn't post before nightfall she will die a mysterious death. Should we just let nature take it's course in her case, or should we vote her out so as not to risk the possibility of losing 3 innocent townies in 1 night, if she happens to be on our side?

I'd also like to hear people's thoughts on Plantling. She has posted very few posts so far and seems to be laying very low. She was also mentioning CS and Mee-Mee both as being suspicious to her, although she did not seem convinced that either were bad and ended up voting for Ewurm. I'm curious to see how everyone else views her and hopefully get some more imput from her as well.

So you'd rather waste a vote on someone you know is going to die tonight anyway than go after a suspected bad-guy? You know yourself that suggesting that is a bad move. You team has a nice advantage and you'd rather keep the numbers in your favor? Why not take out another innocent and get a hit in the same night again. Much to think about here.

I was combing through posts before bed last night and noticed that DD has posted much less than it appears she has. Her MO seems to be to appear from nowhere and go after people that have already been backed in a corner. Only once did she put up names of her own and it wasn't anyone that wasn't already heavily under pressure. She's been on ewurm and nmrsco since the beginning and went so far as to welcome ewurm to "her list" on like the 10th post of the game. Her predatory style this game has me thinking.

I must take a shower and get ready for work but afterwards I shall be posting a vote.
 
So you'd rather waste a vote on someone you know is going to die tonight anyway than go after a suspected bad-guy? You know yourself that suggestong that is a bad move. You team have a nice advantage and you'd rather keep the numbers in your favor? Why not take out another innocent and get a hit in the same night again. Much to think about here.

I was combing through posts before bed last night and noticed that DD has posted much less than it appears she has. Her MO seems to be to appear from nowhere and go after people that have already been backed in a corner. Only once did she put up names of her own and it wasn't anyone that wasn't already heavily under pressure. She's been on ewurm and nmrsco since the beginning and went so far as to welcome ewurm to "her list" on like the 10th post of the game. Her predatory style this game has me thinking.

I must take a shower and get ready for work but afterwards I shall be posting a vote.


No, DC, I do not want to waste a vote. I want to do what is best for the town, my team. That's why I am asking what everyone's opinion is and not just throwing out a vote on Guppy and it's why I removed my vote from Guppy yesterday. I am not even suggesting or pushing that we SHOULD vote out Guppy because I know it's a tough situation. But I do want to know what people's thoughts are on it. So in that regard, thank you for responding because I now know at least that you are opposed to it.
 
Good Morning all. I dreamed about zombies last night :(

Anyways, I do not think voting for GGF is a good idea personally. We have no clue what her role is and she could just as well be Innocent as Evil. This isn't a DP type of situation where we know they are around but just not playing. She's gone completely AWOL.

I would personally rather invest my vote in someone I actually suspect is Evil. So my vote stays on Ewurm.
 
I had no idea the evils got to kill someone. Now I know, and have no idea why that warrants a vote.
Wurm, it would benefit you if you would read the rules on page one for the game explanation.

Had some time this morning before my 1st job and thought I'd bring DD out of the shadows. She is always a hard read because she doesn't post much and doesn't give much info. But if you group everything together you can see a pattern.

She has thrown suspicion on 5 people I either think or know are innocent

Ewurm leaning INNOCENT

MM INNOCENT

Ice INNOCENT

HN leaning INNOCENT

DC leaning INNOCENT

Then she questions Z on why place an early vote? Its obvious why, they can be removed and it gets people on the defense. The only reason to hold off voting till the end is so you can strategically place your vote on someone without looking to suspicious.

Mixes up the newbs, LG did too.

Its not adding up. Sure we all have our doubts on Day 1. Fingers get pointed but most of us put a vote on someone early for a response.DD didn't do so. I got jumped because I wanted to take DD out 1st day last game, she tried the same thing.

Right now my list is

KOTD
DD
LG
Sway

I've explained everyone but Sway. I'll get to her tonight.

All of this, Ice is expected because of me singling you out. You need the heat off you, so why not go directly at me.

As for your list which is supposed to be mine, not sure where it is ffrom, other than me questioning people which is how the game is played, how did you figure they are my suspect list? And, I didn't vote for mee-mee last night, voted for you.

Ah and your statement in regards to me not voting early, eh, I voted you and not at the last minute so what gives... and you got jumped for wanting to take me out early last game for trying what, Ice? I was innocent last game too....

So you'd rather waste a vote on someone you know is going to die tonight anyway than go after a suspected bad-guy? You know yourself that suggesting that is a bad move. You team has a nice advantage and you'd rather keep the numbers in your favor? Why not take out another innocent and get a hit in the same night again. Much to think about here.

I was combing through posts before bed last night and noticed that DD has posted much less than it appears she has. Her MO seems to be to appear from nowhere and go after people that have already been backed in a corner. Only once did she put up names of her own and it wasn't anyone that wasn't already heavily under pressure. She's been on ewurm and nmrsco since the beginning and went so far as to welcome ewurm to "her list" on like the 10th post of the game. Her predatory style this game has me thinking.

I must take a shower and get ready for work but afterwards I shall be posting a vote.
umm, I am merely looking at them being newbies and currently, am leaning towards them being innocent but on the fence still. Yes, they are in my suspicions because I am not sure how they play and yes, I might throw a statement of welcoming them to my list to see what their reaction might be. Not satisfied enough with them being innocent or guilty though. How have I been on them since the start except with asking questions?

You two crack me up at how easy you are making yourselves to spot. Here's a clue.... when you are on the evil team, you are not supposed to be so close together in your train collection.
 
Good Morning all. I dreamed about zombies last night :(

Anyways, I do not think voting for GGF is a good idea personally. We have no clue what her role is and she could just as well be Innocent as Evil. This isn't a DP type of situation where we know they are around but just not playing. She's gone completely AWOL.

I would personally rather invest my vote in someone I actually suspect is Evil. So my vote stays on Ewurm.


I don't get an evil vibe from Ewurm. I find Nmrsco more suspicious as a newbie player.

DP wasn't even in my mind when I asked. It was that judge chick from the first game I played in, which you were actually the one who brought it up and pushed for her to be voted out. Kinda surprised that you'd be opposed to it now, but I know circumstances change and maybe you just learned from that experience.
 
Oh and Z...good morning =) Mee-Mee left me the key to her shop so if you'd like some eclairs I'll open it up for you.
 
Wurm, it would benefit you if you would read the rules on page one for the game explanation.



All of this, Ice is expected because of me singling you out. You need the heat off you, so why not go directly at me.

As for your list which is supposed to be mine, not sure where it is ffrom, other than me questioning people which is how the game is played, how did you figure they are my suspect list? And, I didn't vote for mee-mee last night, voted for you.

Ah and your statement in regards to me not voting early, eh, I voted you and not at the last minute so what gives... and you got jumped for wanting to take me out early last game for trying what, Ice? I was innocent last game too....


umm, I am merely looking at them being newbies and currently, am leaning towards them being innocent but on the fence still. Yes, they are in my suspicions because I am not sure how they play and yes, I might throw a statement of welcoming them to my list to see what their reaction might be. Not satisfied enough with them being innocent or guilty though. How have I been on them since the start except with asking questions?

You two crack me up at how easy you are making yourselves to spot. Here's a clue.... when you are on the evil team, you are not supposed to be so close together in your train collection.

Actually no train has been started since that would require a vote. Just because people have come up with facts against you doesn't mean anything more than you're a suspect. You did the same to me along with KOTD and bkw, should I assume that you three are on a team? Did you discuss making a late day train against an innocent? BTW, how is it that you know so well how to act when you're evil?
 
I don't get an evil vibe from Ewurm. I find Nmrsco more suspicious as a newbie player.

DP wasn't even in my mind when I asked. It was that judge chick from the first game I played in, which you were actually the one who brought it up and pushed for her to be voted out. Kinda surprised that you'd be opposed to it now, but I know circumstances change and maybe you just learned from that experience.

Yes, that is correct. I started the "JM train." But since that time I've come to see that doing these preemptive vote offs are a crap shoot and not worth the frustration IMO. But I won't condemn you for thinking differently, I still understand the Pro-arguement.
 
AquariaCentral.com