Excel used as an algaecide

For 02 I can raise the outflows slightly above water line, will this be OK?

Yes, make sure you have decent flow across the surface, but not breaking the surface. A little bubble here or there is fine. Evaporation changes this level a lot, so refill the aquarium often(PITA with the lily pipes).

I got tired of this and added too much water one day and no O2 for my fish, this was without CO2 also, lost 400$ worth of fish.

I figured without CO2, I'd be fine etc.
No, these really are poor when it comes to adding good O2 unless they are splashing. Then you degas at a high rate.

I solved this by addign a small Rio 90 Powerhead near the top corner to add flow and increase surface movement consistently.

Most all of my tanks have one of these.
The larger tanks use Vortech MP10 or MP40, not cheap, but user friendly and really cool.

A MP10 would more than enough for a 60-100 gal tank.
Cost about 190$.

Rio 90= 10$.

So........

Regards,
Tom Barr
 
Tom, thanks for all the great information you share.

One thing I still don't understand (although I believe you) is why optimal conditions for plant growth keep algae away. Since you're not limiting the nutrients available to the plants, these nutrients are theoretically also available for the algae. Why can't the algae use the same nutrients to thrive? Is it different micro nutrients that the algae need compared with plants? Do the plants release some sort of algaecidal chemical under optimal conditions? Why does the algae care what the CO2 level is? Regardless of the CO2 level, there is still light and nutrients available.

Jim

Because the plants define the system, not the nutrients.
That's the simplest explanation.

when you have 30-50% plant coverage, good growth etc, they will modify and control the system. Algae will wait till the seasons change to make their life cycle, much like a annuals and perennials. Algae can still do their entire life cycle, but only when it's optimal for them, the rest of the time, plants are there and grow.

Algae have a much lower level of ppm than plants do, much like you are starving the elephants to starve the mice basically. Will not work well, algae can handle much harsher conditions and leaner ppm's than any plant.
They are not really competing either, I think many are stuck on resource competition only.

One is a single cell, maybe a few cells etc, the other is Billion times larger, complex organ and tissue systems, much lower surface to volume ratio, like mice vs elephants. Fat people vs skinny people. etc.........the amount of CO2 or nutrients required to actually limit algae is many times less than it is for plants.

So the resource model goes to the algae, if you accept it as the model.
Many aquarist do/have in the past.

I think it consider Liebig's law of the minimum(google it) with respect to plants and with respect to algae, treat this like an agriculture system, or a farm or a green house, then you see you cannot limit the plants, otherwise they will not grow, but the algae will.

Something will grow, you have a choice of what that is.

So why does algae grow?
Inducement, much like warm weather and rain causes annual plants to grow and germinate. Why would they need to go to seed and die off if the weather was always nice and wet? Cold weather does not kill off all plants, nor dry weather etc.........

Perennials are fine.........

Same thing here, algae are not induced.
We also do many things to get rid of algae, limit its light, prune/trim old leaves, add more CO2 etc for the plant growth increase, add lots of algae eaters, do water changes, control all aspects of the environment, unlike what occurs in natural systems.

Read this paper from Bachmann et al:

you can see there's no correlation between nutrients and algae WHERE AQUATIC plants are present.

That last part is key, most studies do not include that nor can, Florida has 4800 lakes 4 hectares or larger, this study used 319 lakes, more than most researchers will study in their entire lifetimes.

Non technical version:
http://fishweb.ifas.ufl.edu/Faculty Pubs/CanfieldPubs/Aquatics2004LR.pdf

Tech version

See poor R^2 values
http://fishweb.ifas.ufl.edu/Faculty Pubs/CanfieldPubs/macrophyte.pdf

General page for Roger:
http://fishweb.ifas.ufl.edu/Bachmann/Bachmann.htm

On CO2:

http://fishweb.ifas.ufl.edu/Bachmann/CO2_FL_lakes.pdf

Keep you out of trouble for awhile:duh:

Regards,
Tom Barr
 
uh oh,
I better save those for my morning coffee instead of my afternoon cabernet lol
 
Thanks Tom.

I'm confused as to whether you're saying the algae growth is induced or not. Are you saying that the algae will not be induced to grow when conditions are optimal for plant growth and stable? Do the algae spores somehow sense changing conditions as an inducement to multiply? :confused:
 
Thanks Tom.

I'm confused as to whether you're saying the algae growth is induced or not. Are you saying that the algae will not be induced to grow when conditions are optimal for plant growth and stable? Do the algae spores somehow sense changing conditions as an inducement to multiply? :confused:

You understood it correctly.
Yes... there's a germination signal.....put another way spores, seeds etc just do not grow for no good reason ........all the time.........24/7........some seem to imply that, by suggesting plant/algae competition senario, it's not the only game in town.;)

You need a certain amount of plants and right amount of light, CO2 nutrients........spores/vegetative resting cells can sit and wait till there's a certain threshold of light also, and they know if the light is being blocked by another algae/plant, or a Rock, piece of wood etc.

Temps are another one, or a sudden influx of NH4, to a sudden change in CO2 during the light cycle. I think the CO2 is indirect, it causes some response/s in the plants, and the algae sense that.

Few know anything about this in the research also, there's little reason to study it.

So little will be done there.

Regards,
Tom Barr






Regards,
Tom Barr
 
Reduced lighting from 216 watts to 108 watts for 10 hrs. C02 is up 40 ppm.
Increase current/02? I'm not sure what you mean. I have 2 Eheim canister filters, the 2217 and 2128 w/210 watt heater. My tank is the 120p ADA(65 gallons) I use 2 Cal Aqua Labs efflux outflows, one at each end of the tank. No restriction to flow. For 02 I can raise the outflows slightly above water line, will this be OK?

Tom, we discussed increased C02, decreased lighting, 02/current. What about dosing ferts? I use your formula of Marcos PMDD style of dosing. Should I decrease the amount of dosing?
 
AquariaCentral.com