Originally posted by ash
I agree that there is a time and a place- and if I had little enough taste to pay for such a concert I would of course, hope that she would stick to what she was paid to do instead of providing commentary- but at the same time I really can't see caring that much about what she has to say. That's why I don't understand why there is such backlash about celebrity viewpoints- it's their right to say what they think, sure but why on earth is anyone listening? That quote about hoping they don't hire her was really odd- I wasn't sure what to make of that either. The whole thing is just very odd. If, hypothetically, politics was not forbidden in her contract then the whole thing is insanely wrong, in addition to being an overreaction. If it was, then she made her choice but I still think the thing about her being thrown out of the building is extreme.
Ash, just because you and, for the record I, do not like the entertainer does not mean people who do have bad taste. Their taste is just different from yours and mine on this particular entertainer.
As far as what she has to say, they may have found her words insulting. What if she had stood up and talked about how stupid and ignorant people are who keep aquariums? What if she was making comments that portrayed your ancestry in a negative light?
If you are a die-hard Republican/Bush supporter and you have family or friends who are in harms way, you may see Michael Moore's as traitorous and her remarks just as insulting as if she had attacked your race, religion, creed or national origin.
On top of that, you think you are having your feelings trampled on by someone you paid to entertain you and they, the entertainer, expects you to just sit there and get insulted. They voiced their displeasure at her remarks by leaving. When you don't like the TV show, you change the channel. Well, they changed the channel.
They did not, as far as I read, disrupt the show or cause a distrubance. They left.