It could be but it doesn't look very deep or wide. Of course it's hard to tell what the size is without knowing how big the fish are.
Full tank shots
- Thread starter BigFishKeeper
- Start date
It could be but it doesn't look very deep or wide. Of course it's hard to tell what the size is without knowing how big the fish are.
Be fair/reasonable folks. You can't judge water quality from those pics - just not a great cam/lighting conditions whatever for a start. Nor is the installed filtration apparent.
On a completely unrelated note I would not appreciate my own stocking being overly scrutinised. I don't know why I went off topic there. I shall be setting a good example and do my best not to do it again, here in the photo forum.
On a completely unrelated note I would not appreciate my own stocking being overly scrutinised. I don't know why I went off topic there. I shall be setting a good example and do my best not to do it again, here in the photo forum.
Be fair/reasonable folks. You can't judge water quality from those pics - just not a great cam/lighting conditions whatever for a start. Nor is the installed filtration apparent.
On an unrelated not I would not like to have my own stocking overly scrutinised
Ummm, nor would I :lipssealedsmilie:
As always, a model of diplomacy Coler
Edit: If not 'overly' how about partially? :hitting:
Last edited:
Judging by the couch in front of the tank, I would say it is bigger than a 55...
It looks like at least 120 to me...it is well over 5 feet long..
It looks like at least 120 to me...it is well over 5 feet long..
Its hard to say not knowing. Lets keep this to comments for the OP that are constructive. Debating the size of the tank has nothign to do with the OP, lets keep it on track please.
