At least he found it then, and not someone else with "extreme intent"!
I would really like to believe his statement. "My main thing was wanting to find out about UFOs and suppressed technology." Then again, there is 'dishonesty' involved here.. But, I guess no matter what comes from it, without tangible proof, it will be "laughed at" and become a "debunkers paradise".
******************************************
*********************************************
***************************
(Very offensive words replaced by * to avoid problems)
Some might misuse 'that' word and cause a ruckus of .....
That's why I originally 'clarified' the meaning. That 'clarification' has been removed.
:thm:
-------
I'm still trying to define words and topics so as not to P/O anyone! PM me if you need a definition on (P/O).. And - the truth still hurts ... (also, PM me on that too...) Ooops, sorry that I went off this Topic, I'm still distracted...
And, this is stated "as is" and "IMO" so, no biggie...
Originally posted by OrionGirl
Malarkey. If a hacker doesn't want to cause damage, they don't--if they break something, they intended to. Getting IN doesn't require damaging the system or any data on it.
I agree. Getting into a system does not damage the system. Most often when someone who is not an expert in computer systems hacks into a network they try to "erase their tracks". Delete a few files, system log events, etc.
They don't know what they are doing completely. Erase system critical files. System goes down, etc. That's how the damage most often occurs.
And most probably how this guy damaged anything if it is even true.
