how many hours to light FOWLR and REEF tanks??

i just noticed today .. but there are some bits of plant life growing on my LR.. it sorta looks like sea weed.. like a fern or something ... umm my room is dark in the day and the tank is placed in the middle area so a minimal amount of light enters the tank.
 
My actinics go on at 830a, off at 10p.
Halides on at 2p, off at 9p.

As far as the usefulness of various photoperiods, you have to consider intensity as well as time. I have seen studies using photoperiods from 10-15 hours, and the effects on coral growth very much depended on intensity. Keep in mind that fish and corals live with a 12 hour photoperiod in the tropics.

To be un-diplomatic for a moment, I find the loose talk about photoperiod and algae blooms to be a bit disturbing. I would be a lot more comfortable if someone were to point to a systematic study showing the effects of photoperiod on algae growth in reef tanks.

Jacobus, your setup sounds fine. If your daytime is their night time, that should work. It may be hard on the animals if they ever have to get jobs on the outside. pH normally drops at night, due to decreased photosynthesis, although it's kind of surprising, since your lights are on at night. Even with a reverse photoperiod in the refugium, mine varies by about 0.2 over the course of the day.

The fern-like thing is hopefully a macroalga that will be decorative and healthy. It may be bryposis, which is not so desirable, but we'll have to see what it starts to look like.
 
hmm well .. its the same sorta algae that i bought from a lfs for my old tank ... so it should be good .. umm.. morgunda .. i dont understand what u mean about my reverse photoperiod ..
 
mogurnda said:
To be un-diplomatic for a moment, I find the loose talk about photoperiod and algae blooms to be a bit disturbing. I would be a lot more comfortable if someone were to point to a systematic study showing the effects of photoperiod on algae growth in reef tanks.
Good point, sorry about that Dave, no more loose talking :). I wanted to post and just mention that someone had told me what I was doing might not work because I didn't want Mooch to follow what I was doing and then end up with problems. The person who told me I'd end up with a HA bloom was speaking from their own personal experience, they had nothing else to back them up. Apparantly they had a setup 'just like yours (mine), Caulerpa and everything' and zero N and P but HA moved in and took over. Thinking about it now, it's silly to think that an extra two hours of light could be the sole cause, obviously there were nutrients coming from somewhere.
 
I am actually feeling bad about that rant. Sorry. I was reacting to the general tone of the thread, which made it sound like extending the photoperiod a little bit will result in stress and disaster. Actinics have been on 13-14 hrs/day for years in my tanks, and I see no correlation with stress or algae blooms. However, I did a little reading this morning, and most authors do recommend 12 hours max.
 
just another question .. about the watts per gallon thing.. just how much should it be ?
 
jacobus said:
just another question .. about the watts per gallon thing.. just how much should it be ?

watts per gallon doesnt really apply in salt. It's more about intensity and reflector quality.

MH are best for deep tanks, and high light corals.

VHO are second, but not as effective as MH. Good for low-medium light corals.

T5 and PC are pretty much in the same league, and good for low-medium light corals. However, T5's if they have the right reflector (Tek light) can be good enough for high demanding corals on tanks that are not that deep or large. 100 gallons max from what ive read.
 
Your T5 thing is wrong, i have seen acros and clams grown in a 220 gallon with t5 lighting and it was perfectly fine, set up for about 2 years and the owner recently went for a change in lights, no problems at all.
 
AquariaCentral.com