Currently in my cart is: (taking advantage of combo deals of course)
Corsair TX650 PSU combo'd with WD Caviar Black 1TB SATA HDD
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T combo'd with Sony Optiaric SATA CD/DVD Drive
ASUS M4A785TD-V Evo combo'd with Scythe Katana3 92mm CPU Cooler
Comes in at around $525
Thoughts?
A thought I just had... You
might consider going for a board based on the 880G or 890GX chipset instead of the 785G. There are a few 880G boards that are about the same price as the ASUS you're looking at (some are cheaper), and they have a faster integrated GPU, which would be nice to have if you end up using the IGP while saving up for a video card. If you buy the right one, you also get a newer, better southbridge.
For instance, with
this one, you're spending $5 more and giving up your option to use Crossfire down the road, but you're getting SATA3 and USB3.0, both of which will be nice features to have going forward.
This one doesn't have the new southbridge or multiple PCI-E x16 slots, but it's $20 cheaper than the board you're looking at. Conversely,
this one is $20 more but you preserve your Crossfire upgrade path while gaining USB3.0 and SATA3.
The 785 board is absolutely fine, it's very similar to the one in my own Phenom system. I'm just offering you an alternative to consider.

Other than that, your cart looks good, and given that the 785 board has the combo with the Katana, that's probably enough to sway the purchase decision in its favor. I'd hold off until you can afford the RAM too, though, so you can properly burn in the system and do some stability testing before Newegg's 30 day return window lapses.
Also, don't forget to pick up 3 more 120mm fans (and screws for them if they don't come with them).

:
If you chose a cheaper cpu I like pentium more and you could pick out a 2.8 gh core2 processor that would be a lot cheeper and I think you can get away with a cheaper motherboard. That alone could save you a hundred. the other thing is you could get away with 2gb of ddr2 ram especailly if you are going to use windows 7 because from my experience this system works a ton better than vista and isn't a ram hog. I have 2 gb and i can play a lot of dx10 games and i always have a ton of programs running and most of the time i never really run into a problem. That would also save you some money.
Weed is pretty set on the X6 (for good reason), but I'm going to respond to this on the off chance that someone else is lurking and reading this for their own system build and actually considers taking your advice.
- The Core 2 architecture is, clock-for-clock, slower in most applications than the Phenom II architecture. Especially when it's hampered by a gimped FSB and a tiny cache. Which leads me to...
- The only ~2.8GHz Core 2 chips at Newegg right now that are cost-competitive with the 1055T are dual core chips. I sincerely hope that you're not seriously suggesting that a dual core chip based on an outdated, 4 year old architecture is even remotely comparable to a six-core Phenom the way it sounds like you are. Even the 3.33GHz E8600 (which is $290 on Newegg and which only a complete fool would buy now that i7s are around $200) can't keep up with the 1055T in most applications. And that performance gap is only going to get wider over the next several years as more and more mainstream applications are optimized for multithreading across more than two cores.
- Even if the Core 2 Duo was a valid alternative to the x6, you also have to consider future upgrades. LGA775 is dead. It's gone. It's EOL. DOA. Finished. The platform is no longer being developed and no new chips are scheduled to come out for it. So if you want to upgrade to a faster chip two years from now, you're limited to chips that are already out and which are, even now, 2+ years old. AM3, on the other hand, is still current, and new chips are still coming out for it. Forget performance, the simple fact that the socket is EOL dictates that the idea of buying anything based on LGA775 at this point is asinine.
- Assuming someone was crazy enough to buy a Core 2 anything right now, they'd probably want to stick with an Intel P/G/Q45-based board. Every other C2 chipset is either horrifically outdated, terrifyingly unreliable (I'm looking at you, nVidia) or leaves some (sometimes a lot of) performance on the table compared to the x45s. We can safely ignore everything that's not made by Gigabyte, MSI, EVGA or ASUS because everything else on the market is likely to be either: a. unreliable, b. poorly made, with low quality components and/or c. next to worthless for overclocking. Narrow your search down with those criteria on Newegg and you're left with one board that comes in under $99. And it's $89. So yeah. No savings there without going for a motherboard that's of considerably lower quality than the AMD board he's looking at.
- There's no money to be saved on RAM by going with an outdated Intel platform either, since the DDR2 that the one $89 x45 board requires is now the same price-often more expensive-than DDR3.
- If you're doing anything serious with your computer, you're going to find rather quickly that 2GB of RAM is wholly inadequate on Windows 7. 4GB is the bare minimum I would use with Vista or 7, and 8GB is preferable. Anything over 8GB is nice to have (I've got 18 and I'm planning to step up to 24 or even 48 within the next 18 months) and Win7 in particular will make good use of it, but it's not required.
Don't get me wrong, I have no problem with Intel; most of my personal systems are Intel-based, and I use i5s and i7s for all of the computers I deploy at work except for the very cheapest boxes (which are Phenom II x3/4/6 based). That doesn't change the fact that right now, in August of 2010, there is absolutely no way to justify the purchase of a Core 2 (be it a Duo or a Quad), either in a desktop or a laptop, no matter what the intended use of the system is. It just flat out does not make sense.
good to know, thanks. i :bowing: to your geekiness on the fly. :clap::clap::clap:
:lol2: Thanks. Power supplies are a hobby of mine (yeah, I have no life. I know. Why do you think I have this screen name?

:grinno: ). Once you've seen a whole host of systems come across your desk with problems like
this one, you tend to get rather cynical, somewhat cranky, and slightly obsessive about knowing which manufacturers and models of power supply can be trusted and which can't.