KNO3 and dosing via fish waste and K2SO4 are quite different.
One version starts out as organic N and then urea and NH4.
These can lead to algae(especially with higher light) and why we cannot keep adding more and more fish to supply N in higher light/CO2 enriched tanks.
The other starts out as NO3 and is taken up.
KNO3 has a positive impact on the O2 levels.
Organic N from fish has a negative one.
Now at lower light, or non CO2 tanks, the rate of N uptake can be matched with fish waste.
But.......you do not have to do a non CO2 tank that way either.......you can add KNO3 and not have a high fish load.
Likewise with a CO2 enriched high light tank, you can have a good sized plant and fish load, an top off the needs with KNO3.
I had a client who had 14 discus full size well fed and other cories, cards etc in a 120 gal tank, by most folks' standards, this was a packed tank.
About 50% of the N came from the worms/food etc, the other 50% came from the KNO3. He still did not require K2SO4, see the KNO3 sticky here on AC.
This was at 220w PC lighting (A&H supply) of light on a 120 gallon tank with CO2.
This amount of lighting was more than enough, by many's standards, relatively low lighting. He is able to grow any plant he wants and the tank looks super.
Now you can add more and more fish and food etc and have less plant biomass if you are willign to do more frequent and larger water changes.
One SFBAAPS member has massive fish loads with Java fern, no CO2 etc, but he has an auto water changer that does 30% daily water changes.
One feller added NH4, about 0.5ppm per day but also did 80% water changes daily.
It can be done, but the trade offs might not be acceptable.
Therein lies the utility in trying many methods once you have mastered one method.
You know what each has to offer, why it works and the limitations.
Regards,
Tom Barr