Mafia 100-The Witches Return-The Game

FireDancer7905 said:
Why thank you! I can't remember the last game where i wasn't lynched for being too quiet.

With everything truly being based on typed speech, and the trust or distrust therof, i think that we should let bh be turned and lynch hi. If we are being snowed by ricketts, then he's awesomesauce and we should be ok with it, Lol. But, i don't think we are, because had someone else *really* recieved s pm they would br sure to be making a strong push against ricketts right now.

Lg, does the random event require that the player maintain silence?
Click to expand...
Sorry Fire, I can not give the details of the "random event".
 
The random event would not be optional. There might be choices, but it would be mandatory. The post that LG posted was the result of the random event. No one was given a spell that they could or could not use. Silly witches. Nice try. Witches be tripping.
 
[AC] Tree_Hugger;2752908 said:
The random event would not be optional. There might be choices, but it would be mandatory. The post that LG posted was the result of th e random event. No one was given a spell that they could or could not use. Silly witches. Nice try. Witches be tripping.
Click to expand...

So, shouldn't we lynch ricketts instead? If s/he is lying, that's a fairly good indication that they're scum.
 
[AC] Tree_Hugger;2752904 said:
Does anyone else think the dialog between Rickets and Wing looks a little strange.
Click to expand...
Yes

[AC] RICKETS;2752776 said:
You're **** right you're not saying I'm a witch. If you deliberately lie to the town, the game ends in disqualification because of it.

You know that as well as I do.
Click to expand...
Since when? This game is full of people lying and is based on sifting through lies to find the truth. HH deliberately lied to the town, but it was for the good of the town. Should the game have ended in disqualification?

[AC] wing nut;2752782 said:
Okay after careful consideration and being told by Lady I should be helping the town in the "spirit" of the game.

Turn Bad Haggis


But that is the only name I am giving freely. Votes will be based on not knowing who is who and following Trees lead as you guys are.
Click to expand...
I cannot see LG stepping in and telling you you HAD to play for the town. Mods are here to moderate, they don't tell people how to play. There is nothing in the rules that says you have to play for the town once turned.
 
[AC] Star-Crossed;2752920 said:
Yes


Since when? This game is full of people lying and is based on sifting through lies to find the truth. HH deliberately lied to the town, but it was for the good of the town. Should the game have ended in disqualification?


I cannot see LG stepping in and telling you you HAD to play for the town. Mods are here to moderate, they don't tell people how to play. There is nothing in the rules that says you have to play for the town once turned.
Click to expand...

I will step in here and say (although I can not confirm/deny if they were turned) if a player was evil/innocent turned innocent/evil...they play for the opposite team and in the spirit of the game, need to take out their former team mates. It is unfair to the team you switched to NOT to do the best of your ability. That does not mean they HAVE to name each and everyone of their team old mates off the bat...although, lying to your now team mates for benefit of the the opposite team is not very sportsman like .
 
Lady G said:
I will step in here and say (although I can not confirm/deny if they were turned) if a player was evil/innocent turned innocent/evil...they play for the opposite team and in the spirit of the game, need to take out their former team mates. It is unfair to the team you switched to NOT to do the best of your ability. That does not mean they HAVE to name each and everyone of their team old mates off the bat...although, lying to your now team mates for benefit of the the opposite team is not very sportsman like .
Click to expand...

OK this to me means, whether or not Rickets is playing a scum trick or not, Wing has, very fairly, identified BH as scum.

The question then becomes, do we believe Rickets when they say they hold a turn spell ?

I said earlier that I thought the dialogue had the ring of truth to it.

However, now I am very unsure that we should trust it. Rickets was right up there in my suspects and I have to ask myself why should this change that, in other words, why do I suddenly trust someone who I have viewed with suspicion until now ?

I have no reason to trust Rickets at all. I have in front of my a confirmed witch. I therefore vote to burn Bad Haggis.

As regards Rickets the possibilities are :-

1. They are pro-town and have the spell they describe. On the basis that BH is being lynched and they have no better suspect, they don't cast the spell. Town does not suffer.
2. They do not have the spell they describe. That would make them scum. BH being lynched remains of benefit to the town. We will have to look very carefully at Rickets posting to see if it amounts to an effort to mislead/lie to the town.

My final thought is that there apparently is in fact a random event. I'm a little slow to accept that the random event is another turn spell, like exactly the one the warlock was given. I think there would be some more creativity. I'd be inclined to go with burning the known witch, BH, tonight and see if something turns up during the rest of today or tomorrow that gives more insight to the random event. I mean, if the random event is clearly something other than Ricket's spell-claim, we burn them immediately.

I won't be around for nightfall. Happy with my vote.
 
Vote Count:

Chupa-(0)-Star, Tree, Wing, Doom, Rickets, Bad Haggis, scoop

Bad Haggis-(3)-Star, Rickets, Tree

Rickets-(0)-Tree, Star

IQ-(1)-Bad Haggis

Votes on Chupa will not count.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
AquariaCentral.com
Top Bottom