Mafia 101 - Blarney Castle: Return of the Leprechauns - Game Thread

First off, I apologize if this doesn't make any sense. I'm very tired, slightly medicated, and in pain so my mind isn't completely on this task right now.

Towards the end of last night I got the impression that LG was attempting to peel votes off of O3T. She says she wanted to see if something would happen, like a play from the scum team to try and save him. That's plausible, but when the vote count is everybody to one I think it's a low percentage play.

As far as the exchange between LG and kash. What strikes me is that LG's replies seem to be ad hominem attacks rather than responses to the point made. Sure, Kash is very good at appearing to be pro-town no matter which side she's on. JB found some things from Kash's posts to poke at, but LG seems instead to have responded to Kash's reputation instead.

As Jb pointed out, Kash's clearing of Me, Fozzy, and aaf does bug me. I know that I'm a townie, but to clear someone by day 3 is a bit off to me. Her explanation is good but I'd say it's at minimum a little early to start clearing people.
 
This post by Driver bugs the heck out of me. So I wanted to bring it up.

[AC] Driver8;2762628 said:
Slow day I see. Not a lot to read through or catch a slip or real importance...kind of puts folks in the position to ride the "wave" on O3T (can't see it as a train right now), throw another random out there since there wouldn't be any quotable justification for it. I think AAF's vote on HI Q is really their version of an OMGUS vote over the previous banter. I'll take the wave for now...subject to change...not that I see enough new input happening to do so...

I vote to lynch O3T...


Yes, it was a slow day. there were still 200 posts to find something in though, and Dawg had in fact done just that. You seem to be saying that everyone is just coasting along and voting O3T because everyone was voting him/her. Then you hop on the bandwagon because that's what everyone does. It's like you're condemning everyone for jumping on the bandwagon, but then you do it yourself. It's a useless post full of contradiction and angst.

The rest of what you bring to the thread isn't much better.

Makes me think you're just frustrated scum, can you confirm or deny?
 
k... My brain is fried and the no search thing is making this really difficult atm, so I'm going to try to sum up:

Wiz: Something seems off there. I really need to go back through and look at his posts more. The way it sits in my memory, Wiz is following a bit which is not like him at all. I could be totally off though.

Driver: I think Driver is smoking crack. The whole thing about the person saved from the midget scum hit might be evil is just absurd. I don't get that at all. I can see if he said that docs had accidentally put the protection on scum in the past. Hell, I've done that as doc. But to imply that there might actually be something to protect them from is just... absurd. Driver, please seek help. There are a lot of ways to get sober when you're ready to change. Personally, I think that statement would be "rock bottom" for most people.

Zaffy: a) I hope you're feeling better, dude. seriously. b) I don't have any real reason to suspect you because you haven't posted much, but as I said before, I've seen you coast as scum once too often to not keep shining a light on you. I'm still interested to hear where you're at with all this.



Anyway, I'm going to hang it up for the night and let my brain rest. I'll get to looking into the people mentioned above and post my thoughts there, along with a vote before I go to work tomorrow since I don't know if I'll get home in time for nightfall.

Thanks JB, please ask away anything I should answer to.
 
Just got home. Met my son at the Cheesecake Factory for dinner but, didn't see Penny or Bernadette. :confused:
 
I am too tired to go back and pull stuff but I need to make a couple of comments.

JB, quit reading the game on your phone. (or get better glasses) I did respond to you questions to me about Fozzy. I had mentioned that I didn't like how he hadn't answered to a direct question to him and thought if it continued it would be worth possibly voting or something like that.
 
Question for JB, how does it seem I am following? If memory serves, and there could be a flaw there, I have been drinking and am tired to boot, I started out on G and IQ, I continued on them, and was the first vote on G. Maybe you need a better dictionary because I think we have different definitions of "following".
 
I did not come out and say I thought he was innocent, if I had the evils would know for sure I thought he was innocent by not saying for sure one way or the other, it leave a possibility they may try to play on what I had said and it would show who they were in the end. That may not make a lot of sense the way I said it, but it is the only way I can explain it, you see if they think there is some doubt they will play on that and you can pick up on it.

I call BS. You were trying to get everyone to look at Dawg and Kashta. You did not "lower" him on your list. You didn't vote Dawg because you knew you couldn't get him lynched. You put the hit on him and voted Kashta.

G, regardless of what you say, you have been grasping at straws and posting in desperation in an attempt to look like you are trying to help the town. The problem is you are trying too hard. That reads to me like scum that is found out and trying to prove they are innocent by trying to show how they are "helping the town".

As for the shamrocks, to be honest, I forgot about them. I tend to worry about things I can do something about and not worry about things I can't. I can do something about the scum and am doing so by rooting you out. I can do nothing about the shamrocks.

It is funny how you and IQ say that you are just looking for scum and questioning people, because that is how the game is played, yet, when someone questions you or looks at you, they are scum.
 
from past games ive played with kash those long wordy posts meant her trying to "help" the town by seeming to be a townie. now i haven't played as much as most and i could be totally wrong but it is something to look at. im very confident on my vote on Hi Iq.

All of that being said, if I had to vote right now and could only choose between LG and Kash, it would be LG. Thankfully that's not the case. I still can't get the little voice to stfu that says they're two townies going at it.

Good thing I have a couple other suspects to look into...

I call BS. You were trying to get everyone to look at Dawg and Kashta. You did not "lower" him on your list. You didn't vote Dawg because you knew you couldn't get him lynched. You put the hit on him and voted Kashta.

G, regardless of what you say, you have been grasping at straws and posting in desperation in an attempt to look like you are trying to help the town. The problem is you are trying too hard. That reads to me like scum that is found out and trying to prove they are innocent by trying to show how they are "helping the town".

As for the shamrocks, to be honest, I forgot about them. I tend to worry about things I can do something about and not worry about things I can't. I can do something about the scum and am doing so by rooting you out. I can do nothing about the shamrocks.

It is funny how you and IQ say that you are just looking for scum and questioning people, because that is how the game is played, yet, when someone questions you or looks at you, they are scum.
Have a said I think you are scum?
 
Have a said I think you are scum?

Now that you mention it, I stand corrected. I still have to vote my best suspect, and your posting has been the scummiest thing I see so far. I don't think I will get home by night fall so my vote will need to stay where it is.
 
I vote to lynch Lady G

I just don't think she's sincere this game. Her arguments are based on logical fallacies.
 
AquariaCentral.com