Mafia 104 - Dawg the Bounty Hunter - The Play

[Fishfriend1]

Dun, nevermind, I mistook an above post, my b

Fish friend you can be confident that I'm more focused on helping the town rather than deflecting suspicion. Pap's comment about maybe wanting to hide something wasn't enough to make me defend or deflect anything. It was probably just an observation like yours and it's not enough to make me worried about others being suspicious.

BUT
What is suspicious to me is you and pap have now said something about me possibly having ulterior motives. Could be coincidence but it's really making me wonder.

Stating that others have ulterior motives is what this game is about, every time you accuse someone of something you're saying they have ulterior motives... you even did so in your post

Nice job FF, I am impressed you came up with that. happens I did misspeak or type I guess but it could be read they way you pointed it out.

Vote - Post... *checks keyboard* V and P are no where near each other.... the O is fine (lol), but unless you have a strange keyboard the T and S shouldn't be near each other, and there should be an R in between the E and T. I find it difficult to believe that a mere mistype turned the word 'Post' into the word 'Vote'.

 

[Chill]

the pir/kash thing seemed like it was more on a personal level then a game thing to me. not sure how to take it and it's already done and over with. wish there was more to go on with that.

the whole "thank you" situation made me want to think there was a scum alliance or PR involvement, but with pir gone that seems less likely since he turned up innocent. although i might want to keep an eye on jp and chill. not sure yet.

as for the whole random thing with rich... i can see wanting to out rich early if he is indeed scum. he has a tendency of sticking around till the end and almost coming out of the woodwork to be a power player in the final stages. as for seeing a D1 vote as anything but random... idk about that one.

but to clear things up about how random things can be... i vote to lynch the whomever posts the very next post after this one.

The only reason I can possibly think of where you wouldn't be sure you want to keep an eye on Jp and Chill is if you all ready know who the scum are. Do you know who the scum are Dun?

 

[rich311k]

Dun, nevermind, I mistook an above post, my b



Stating that others have ulterior motives is what this game is about, every time you accuse someone of something you're saying they have ulterior motives... you even did so in your post



Vote - Post... *checks keyboard* V and P are no where near each other.... the O is fine (lol), but unless you have a strange keyboard the T and S shouldn't be near each other, and there should be an R in between the E and T. I find it difficult to believe that a mere mistype turned the word 'Post' into the word 'Vote'.

More of a miss think. I had just typed vote made sure it was in bold so I typed the wrong word.

 

[Chill]

Chill, with the way the "random" votes fell, can you help me undertand why you questioned Zaffy's reason over anyone elses?

I thought that was clear. Everyone was voting randomly and Zaf made a big deal out of Rich voting randomly. Claiming it wasn't random at all. Zaffy's vote wasn't random it was for a reason. I got the feeling that Zaffy's reason was an attempt to make something out of nothing. Zaffy being Zaffy though it's hard to tell. I might have been wrong (of course we won't know that till we know Zaffy's alignment). At this point if I have to place a placeholder vote it will still be Zaffy till something better comes along.

 

[dundadundun]

The only reason I can possibly think of where you wouldn't be sure you want to keep an eye on Jp and Chill is if you all ready know who the scum are. Do you know who the scum are Dun?

i wish. it would make the game so much easier.

do you know who they are?

 

[Chill]

I could probably more easily list the people I would NOT turn...naming suspects that way is both lazy and scummy IMHO.

While I agree that the list of who I would not turn would be much shorter than who I would turn. For me exclusion with this list of players would be based soley on a player's propensity to UD. Voting a player based on this would be scummy and lazy. Naming suspects this way though I don't have a problem with. I'll comment more after I quote Kash.

 

[Chill]

i wish. it would make the game so much easier.

do you know who they are?

Wish I did, but sadly no I don't. See where I clearly said no I don't. I notice you didn't say that.

 

[Fishfriend1]

Well, for now, I'm going to place a placeholder vote on Rich, because I still don't really understand how Post can become Vote when using the standard keyboard like the one my dell laptop has.

I vote to lynch Rich

Vote subject to change (as always).

As of right now I honestly don't know what to think about Neph (which you can take in any way you like). Kashta I find interesting because she did seem to have a bit of a focus on Pir, regardless of reason, and that seems a little... off for Kashta.

 

[Chill]

To Neph, Lab Rat, JB, Rich, and Zaffy:

For crying out loud, folks. Do you really think we ought to give the addicts pointers and the benefit of our analysis about who they should turn next vs. whomever else they might target?

:hypnotized:



No kidding! Thank you for that, Pappy.

I know you don't like speculation Kash. I also know it's a fundmentall differnce between us that causes me to suspect you at times. This is the worse kind of speculation in that almost everybody's list would be slightly differnt.

I don't believe you really think this list of players need pointers or would even take pointers from the town. I also don't like that you shut it down as those lists could have been useful when one of the list makers rolled scum.

 

[dundadundun]

Wish I did, but sadly no I don't. See where I clearly said no I don't. I notice you didn't say that.

yes i see what you said.
but i implied such as well.
clearly i have no idea who scum is otherwise said information couldn't possibly make anything easier.