It may 'extend D1', but not all of D1 is pointless stuff. Granted, a lot of it is, but as it gets closer to nightfall, more 'real' content occurs. Lynch or not, people will start shifting to real content, and I personally would rather see more of this before making a decision who to remove from the game. With these rules, that is impossible, so I'd like to put a vote on someone who appeared like they will UD, so they will not be contributing to the game.
And yes, we do have better odds, but we still don't have a huge amount of townies, and I'm not content with these blind votes.
Don't get me wrong, I am still happy about last night's events, but the thing is, the town didn't make it a good nightfall. The one we should thank is bigfoot. :grinyes:
The concept of voting UDs has been discussed in the past in great detail. I've never seen a compelling argument for why the town should take that route on any day. The biggest shift to "real content" occurs when there are legitimate votes to be analyzed. Without that it's still D1 no matter how you look at it and blind votes would continue to happen.
First of all, I am happy that Rich is gone. I just didn't like it how Rich voted me, and it then was killed by Bigfoot. It could have been a frame. (i.e. "Rich voted Pir and then Rich got killed by bigfoot, so Pir must be Bigfoot.") Not too likely, but hey, I've seen longer stretches.
So you're trying to imply that bigfoot set you up? That's a rather improbable scenario given how they have no idea if you are on their side or not. In fact, the only way bigfoot can play their role right now is by taking shots in the dark and hoping the odds do work in their favor. To suggest there was any strategic foresight in their hit choice is just incorrect.
But I was the first person to have more than one vote.
Shortly after I had the 2nd vote on me, putting me in the lead, 2 people voted DD, putting her in the lead. Again, could be a total coincidence, and I'm not accusing you of anything, just putting it out there.
Yeah and there were a good 5 votes or so that could have been placed anywhere. And I don't think anyone could argue that what DD posted didn't at least look suspicious, even though some chose not to vote there. In addition, very rarely does anyone, when scum, decide to all pile on the same person (especially so early) just to make another look bad. If you're innocent then why wouldn't they just let you go? It's just a WIFOM scenario that doesn't seem to be anything but a big coincidence.
The fact that you are just "putting it out there" is what concerns me. You have not one, but two scenarios that all revolve around you being framed which is a subtle way of basically saying "I'm innocent."