Mafia #12

Late votes can be read in a few ways.

1. Can be a safe vote to have a vote out there and not be killed for not voting.

2. Can be 1 with a chance to jump on to a player leading to save said player, be it a mafia saving mafia or an innocent saving someone they deem innocent.

3. Might be someone they feel strongly about and hope others think so also, usually a good case is made with the vote.

Theres still 5 hours left so I wouldn't really consider a vote right now late, in the last hour or 2 yes, but there is still time to rally support for someone you want others to vote for.

I agree for the most part, but it's really close to being late considering we're on a 72 hoour day and there are some who have not voted at all or voted for nonsense. DP voted for himself and then Colonel Mustard and has laid low pretty much since.
 
I agree with you Jpap and am glad DD took off on you like she did. It cleared you IMO with me.

I jumped on with HN onto you because of the post and the time you returned. I think you explained it well enough and I believe you to be truthful.

I've looked at some other days and your post times are consistent with what you said. You'll post mid afternoon and then disappear for an hour and a half or so returning early evening.
 
Well its a real wasp nest in here today. Just finished catching up and since HN asked nicely, sort of :D, here's my list.

Day 1 - 14/17 Votes - Saturday at about 9PM Central Time
No Votes: Dwarf Puffers, Sovran, King (withdrawn)
4-jpappy789: Hooked Newbie (76) IceH2O (78) Charlie_stubbs (124) DangerDoll (131) Hooked Newbie (246) ZSandmann (251)
4-DD: IceH2O (202) johnlarson (209) jpappy789 (244) judgemax (254)
2-Sovran: Swayde (210) Plantling (255)
1-Dwarf Puffers: Dwarf Puffers (23) ewurm (143)
1-No-One: Mee-Mee (161)
1-Lady G: Rbishop (240)
1-IceH2O: Lady G (264)
0-Hooked Newbie: johnlarson66 (12) Swayde (103)
0-ewurm: ZSandmann (72)
0-Charlie Stubss: IceH2O (129)
0-Mee-Mee: Hooked Newbie (156)
0-KOTD: rbishop (163)
 
I agree for the most part, but it's really close to being late considering we're on a 72 hoour day and there are some who have not voted at all or voted for nonsense. DP voted for himself and then Colonel Mustard and has laid low pretty much since.

I think the rule is a vote has to be in at night fall to continue, a vote placed and removed is still considered a no vote. Same with a vote on a non player.

But I do agree that anyone coming in the last couple of hours and voting is suspect for sure.

I was just using LGs vote as a reference because thewre is still a lot of time left.
 
wow pappy, you hate to bring it up again? It appears you are chewing the same old piece of cabbage as Ice. You sure are stretching, and like Ice, continually bringing up the list stuff. Also, you are clearly taking points of my posts and twisting them, or should I say making them out of context. Nice last ditch effort though and nice to suck up to Sov to get her to post her vote to me since she has yet to vote. I only list the truth in what I see out there. But as I have said and will continue to do so, people watch these two after I am gone.

And get so worked up over Sov's post? What is it with you two, I wasn't worked up, I was merely pointing out to Sov that her posts were the kind that people have been accused and lynched for in the past. Nothing more.

Gosh, I sure am glad I kept my vote on you.
 
I think the rule is a vote has to be in at night fall to continue, a vote placed and removed is still considered a no vote. Same with a vote on a non player.

But I do agree that anyone coming in the last couple of hours and voting is suspect for sure.

I was just using LGs vote as a reference because thewre is still a lot of time left.

I hope that is a rule and agreed. I understand changes more five hours out than those who haven't yet voted considering this has been such a long day. I've voted to get reactions as others have. Those not seeking reactions either don't care or already know who to target IMO. LG's vote wasn't extremely late, but it was one of those "this is what I believe so I dont care where the other votes are" votes. I've been guilty of the same thing in the past and I'm afraid it wasn't helpful to the town.
 
I'm saying you are putting to much into things and making what you want out of nothing..trying to confuse ppl a little to much IMO.

You, know I am going to put a vote out there I vote to Lynch Ice
For accusing me of making full blown cases out of nothing and twisting things(which I haven't) then doing exactly what he is accusing me of.

I'll admit I'm over analyzing posts a bit more then usual.Just trying to put a little pressure on the players. Its been almost 72 hours and there are less posts then in a 48 hour day.

Sometimes the mafia player is also confused by the comments and slips up. Pressure becomes slips through covering.
 
And get so worked up over Sov's post? What is it with you two, I wasn't worked up, I was merely pointing out to Sov that her posts were the kind that people have been accused and lynched for in the past. Nothing more.

Gosh, I sure am glad I kept my vote on you.

First you ask Sov if she has read up on any games even though she has played before. Personally I would find that offensive but I won't speak for Sov.

You next say that she is innocent to you but my guess is that you didn't want to seem like you were pushing too much (just my observation, take that anyway you want).

Then you say she should read up before posting and now state that as a reason why you posted...ummm did you actually read her entire post before jumping on her? She said HERSELF that she was going back to read and would post later.

Seems to me like you are the one trying to appear helpful, but I have to admit that you aren't doing a very good job.
 
AquariaCentral.com