Wow, I'm still trying to make sense of things. Please feel free to correct any mistakes, but this is the scenario I got:
Votes were at 3 Jens, 2 RB, 4 Chill, 3 G, 1 JM, 1 Dawg
RB switches from Chill to JM making a 3 way tie between Jensons, Chill, G. (sets tie)
G votes RB but doesn't retract.
Hooked switches from Chill to G making it 2 Jens, 3 Chill, 4 G. (breaks tie)
Dawg switches from G to RB making it 2 Jens, 3 RB, 3 Chill, 3 G. (sets tie)
Hooked switches from G to Jensons making it 3 Jens, 3 RB, 3 Chill, 2 G. (keeps tie)
G switches from Jens to RB making it 2 Jens, 4 RB, 3 Chill, 2 G. (breaks tie)
And lastly G switches from RB back to Jens making it 3 Jens, 3 RB, 3 Chill, 2 G. (sets tie)
I'm still trying to decide if RB set the tie because he just plain likes ties as has been seen the previous night and past games even when innocent and a pr. If he was innocent (could have been turned) then maybe he wanted to see who would move their vote around. Or maybe he believed nobody up for votes was EA. OR he is EA and wanted to appear to be saving Chill and/or cause chaos. But I can't understand why he'd risk himself appearing Scummy when he could have just laid back and let Chill be lynched especially if he wanted to turn JM who was in no danger of being lynched.
And Hooked seemed to be doing the right thing by breaking the tie and giving the Town a chance though small of getting rid of an evil. But it could also be that if he was the EA he wanted an Innocent to be lynched as this is a scorched earth format. But would he take the chance to be the nail in the coffin of an innocent?
Both Dawg and Lady G have me confused on their voting. Both tied up the votes at some point. However Dawg seemed genuinely surprised that others had switched their votes. G on the other hand seemed to jump haphazardly around. She actually broke the tie then followed HN back onto Jensons. Almost seemed like she didn't wanna be the kill vote on anyone.
So my suspicions are still on G and to a lesser extent RB and HN.