Mafia #33 - Bruce Campbell Vs. Army of Darkness

I don't know what RB is this round but when he played the vigilante role and communicated with me, forcing a tie and watching how votes changed was one way we got information. And it did get some pple to move around but I am unconvinced that any of the movers are evil. And they moved around until the last minute, DD, so when did you think RB should have switched?
As already mentioned by HN....but the tie would end with a coin flip in that game, see I remember RB saying something about a coin flip during the late posting...I can't remember his exact words at the time, but I do remember asking him about it, and saying how there is no coin flip this round. In fact I think that statement made others think I thought there was no tie or something..I'll have to go and look. He should of switched when he realized how much turmoil he had caused, or at least said something not "sat back and watched the show" or however he worded it.

I believe the EA is probably among the low posters. Cat posted too much and tripped himself up. Since the EA started off alone, they didn't want to make any waves. I think RB is making too many waves to be the EA. He could have been turned, but really ask yourself if you were the EA, would you pick him, seeing as others are so suspicious of him?
You see Plant now you have me concerned about you more...you sure seem to be sticking up for RB an awful lot, you are a great player so I find it hard to believe that if RB is the E.Ash and you were his turn you would be so openly "protective" of him. Although I have to admit that was my first thought. As far as would I pick RB...really I'm not sure. Could he be the EA and soooo out there...heck yeah he could.
 
I have no doubt RB knew exactly what he was doing...and if this is to "help" the town, can you show me where or HOW he helped by his actions?

RB...is that just to tie things up, your vote switch?? You realize there is no COIN FLIP this round right??
So, here I asked him if he realized there was no coin flip..

His only posts after this while all was happening were, these two...
Gosh...I love this game!

Having fun, Z?

Then DURING NIGHT he posts these....
It is Hooked or Lady as EA II....?

Did they want their chosen turn to not die?

After night
G'night folks! :grinyes:


Now, if he was just "trying to start conversations" (with only 27min left btw)...where was HIS part of the conversation? Why did he during the nightfall make the comment "It is Hooked or Lady as EA II...then add the comment "Did they want their chosen turn to not die" then when he DOES start to answer questions he states that "what he learned from it all" was that myself and hooked seem more innocent???

How, when, and where was he anything but causing chaos and confusion???
 
First, let me say that I have not read all the posts. I'm up to about 1040.

With that being said, I disagree with rb's tactics and conclusions. I believe he selling us a load of bull cookies.

I think rb is the EA and LadyG or hooked is the turn

The only other conclusion that makes sense is that rb is the det analog this round and got something useful during the night.

Sorry but what's a det analog?
 
So, I went back to see where the whole coin flip thing was...wasn't quite what I was thinking but still a little odd....

Good point, and to a certain extent, I feel LadyG and Jensons posting has changed a bit.

About the only one I don't suspect right now is Hooked.

I think every one should review who is hitting on who since last night, and watch the subtle changes that will occur in the next day, in case an evil gets created tonight.

By the way, screw the random coin flip theory too. It is easy to state the results of the flip.

DADDY O!!!! Now, why would you say I have changed?? I do agree we need to watch for changes. What are you talking about with the coin flip thing???

To keep a game going and adjust the dynamics...the coin flip could be just my whim....nothing else needed.


You seem to be a bit pushy, out of the blue; kind of like jensons. Weird.

This also shows how he kept trying to say that Jensons and myself were playing the same:confused:
 
...
Every night we end in a tie we effectively lose one and apparently nobody remembers that the PRs retain their powers if turned. Last night could have cost us the game if the wrong (right for the EA) person was chosen.

Yes but every night we lynch an innocent we lose two. Worse again if we lynch the innocent with the Necronomicon it goes to the Deadites and they can use it to turn another innocent and we lose 3. Lynching the wrong innocent last night could have cost us the game as well.
 
Sorry but what's a det analog?

It's a det that has to upgrade soon or lose signal?

Yes but every night we lynch an innocent we lose two. Worse again if we lynch the innocent with the Necronomicon it goes to the Deadites and they can use it to turn another innocent and we lose 3. Lynching the wrong innocent last night could have cost us the game as well.

You are absolutely correct and I thank you for thinking into things. It seems to me that not many are right now. If the innocent with the Necronomicon was turned, they already have it and we're screwed.
 
HN,

The lynch does not stop a turn (which has a 25% chance of being a hit). The fact that the town's abilty to lynch was stopped hurts the town. No one discussed lynching no one. We, as a town, have the right to vote no one, but everyone thought it was in the town's best interest to lynch someone. While the odds are against us (which they always will be), everyone voted to lynch someone. If RB thought that we should not vote for someone, then why no discuss it, instead he put the town in a situation where none of our votes counted.

Somehow you are okay with this. Is RB hinting to be a power role? Is that his reason? I don't see it. I think he is EAII and his game play day one versus day two is very clear. Now day three he gives this long post. When does rb post long posts? His explaination is stranger than his actions. I quoted a strange part from the end of his speech, maybe it was missed.

Who if not RB is a good suspect?

My list (in order I want to see them lynched):
RB
HN
LG
 
Perhaps I'm being fooled big time by Daddy-O, but I just don't see him acting the way he did if he was EA. While his actions are questionable, I would rather go for someone who I think could be the EA. If I were the EA I would sit back and post just enough to get by. How would everyone else play?
 
Sorry but what's a det analog?

Chill, the word analog as a few meanings. RB used analog in place of version or copy. The 'det' is an abriviation of detective.
 
AquariaCentral.com