Mafia #33 - Bruce Campbell Vs. Army of Darkness

[dirtydawg10]

Don't let Ms. Babble/Ramble sway you..

Why are you giving your main suspect in this game advice?

 

[Rbishop]

Here is something strange from RB also. Hooked is not one of his suspects, but during nightfall he puts Hooked and Lady as EA.

I still see no reason for his vote off of Chill. He created havoc and is to blame for there being no hit.

There is no valid reason that RB changed his vote to judge. I think he is EA and turned judge.

I vote to lynch rbishop

I wouldn't need a reason to change my vote to judge. I had a reason to remove it from chill.

 

[Rbishop]

You know, I didn't catch the Jmax thing..but that makes since to me (what you said) not what Rb did. Very good point there JL...by moving his vote to Jmax, he was "covering" his turn victim!

Yep, makes since to me...so yeah my tops would have to be RB and Jmax:grinyes:

Nope...wrong...AGAIN.

 

[Rbishop]

Ok i don't see rb as being so dumb as to cover his turn it was a three way tie right? so lets say rb turned some one that wasn't even up to a lynching. then he changes his vote to tie things up to misguide us making us think that he is protecting a certian someone but in reality we should just lynch Rb then no one else can be turned if he is EA... RIGHT?????? then all we would have to do is figure out who RB would turn.....

Should I tell everyone it was you?

 

[Chill]

....


Chill, I have to say that you just made one of the blandest posts ever. That may not be a bad thing, but you made three statements that are so vanilla it almost makes me think you want to hide in plain sight.

Sorry if I bored you but since everyone else was going full tilt covering RB in hot sauce - some vanilla might not be a bad thing.

 

[dirtydawg10]

Sorry if I bored you but since everyone else was going full tilt covering RB in hot sauce - some vanilla might not be a bad thing.

It's funny you should say that, Chill...I'm pretty sure RB grabbed the jug of hot sauce and poured it squarely over his own head. Now he seems to be happily rolling around in it and you of all people decided to get down and roll with him.

Things that make you go...Hmmmmm.

 

[judgemax]

OMG! That was a horrible mess to read! Nothing like watching a train wreck unfold!!!
I am very glad that I was not able to watch that! I would have screamed at my computer,( and its feelings would have been hurt, ..I would have had to say sorry, ..and i hate to say sorry!)

OK, well, I think, at this point, my top suspects are the same as most others.

RB, HN, LG.

First of all, I am wondering if HN is not the EA, ..he played out of charachter IMHO, by switching votes as he did. The only time he does that, is when is guilty. I have been in the " war room" with him, as he planned, and laughed while doing so. I also think, RB could be the change...LG, well, I think she might have hurt herself trying to think that out...I think, she still is in a little pain, ..trying to figure out how she got in the 6 foot hole she is standing in.,..

So, without further ado...I vote to lynch RB he has got to be evil. I can hear Him laughing about the mess he created!

HN: I know you answered this, but I want to read it again, ..why the vote switching?..

 

[Hooked Newbie]

HN: I know you answered this, but I want to read it again, ..why the vote switching?..

At the time (and still now pending Rb posting), Jensons was my number one choice. I thought it was 4-3 at the end until I read back over and by then Z had posted night. At the end of the night, LG was my #2 suspect which is why I initially switched to her. I thought the lack of a retraction may have been intentional (she's played enough games to know better), but she then followed up on the change so I went back to Jensons. I voted Rb immediately after nightfall because I want some sort of explanation. I'll help to lynch him happily now even if he is innocent because that was a completely anti-town move. If you all want to vote all the late changers starting with Rb as JL suggested, I'm good with being included in that. The confusing part is that part of me thinks strongly that the sole evil would have either sat back with their vote locked in or changed to push a lynch. Someone (I forget who) posted about the EA's vote already being on one of the 3 in contention and I find that to make alot of sense (and fits with Jensons vote on Chill).

There ya go.

 

[Rbishop]

I have to say...at this point, I just do not know what I think. I still feel something with Jensons, but if she is EA then RB can't be. RB throwing so much confusion out I just don't get it. Then who he voted on made no sense at all, because he had earlier stated he pretty much had her as innocent. So, why of ALL people playing pick one of the 2 ppl you have already put down as innocent in your mind.

The confusion was all yours, my dear...:grinyes:

 

[Rbishop]

I would like to atleast see what rb has to say about all of this. Until he states what he was thinking and why in the world he voted for JM and not any of the leading vote getters, my vote stays. I can't think of a reason for any of this and there also seems to be a slight push to excuse it, because rb just likes to tie things up. In this game ties mean no lynch. Might as well voted no one rb.

There is no excuse for this, rb knew what a tie would mean.

I am okay with lynching any (and all) of the late minute vote changers, starting with rb.

Yep, it meant conversation by some, and vote changes by others and some vote changes not done accurately.