Mafia 34-Time Crisis(the Play)

[cap1384]

There is always the "distancing" tactic, and that could be going on between the two of you.

LOL

YAY! Lady G caught us, even after we already admitted it! Game MVP right here!!! WOOOT!!!

And the winner is _____________!!!!

or a better plan. if he really cared about his team he wouldn't have left or suggested to his teammates that they should leave. wow, its like totally less complicated! erv:

This is very true but thats now waht he did for whatever reason

Well it has been fun pap

 

[Hooked Newbie]

I don't believe I have ever read so many back to back to back meaningless posts than that! You people need to go to bed earlier or remember your meds.

I'm going to review and place my final vote. I won't be here for nightfall, I'll be heading to the aquarium around 2 and won't be back until around 9.

 

[Madcrawdad]

If you read the bottom of that quote you'll see I said until something real comes to light. It was the 1st vote of the game. Look at my later reasons for voting them like late day 1 and early Day cycle 2, after they both said I looked scummy then used my reasoning for voting Chill.

Yes...and if you read the top (below), it says that there was a chance you wouldn't be home before night, which means you were content to ride that vote.

Well I should be home for nightfall since its 8 PM EST but its never a done deal.

I don't want to not vote as I'm against that.

For the time being and only because I don't trust 2 people that live in the same house to play fairly

I vote to lynch Cap


Vote stands as is until anything real comes to light.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Not going to say that, but the case Mad made about you plus the case I made of you defended Chill so heavily is why I'm voting you. I'm not saying Mad isn't a terrorist, as the case by him is weak and could be a distancing tactic.

You're wrong, Ice. The case I made against JPap isn't weak at all... there's the possility that it may not be correct, but the case isn't weak...big difference.

On Day 1, Jpap brought up, and considered the use of a 'no lynch' vote. Normally I'm against a 'no lynch', but in this game (with the bomb transfer aspect) it could make sense. JPap saying so on Day 1, kind of had me leaning him slightly innocent at that point, as it sounded like good townie talk, and something that the terrorists wouldn't be urging, as it did have the potential to hurt their game.

On Night 3 (or 4?) when he came out against not lynching, it made me wonder what had changed. The fact that somebody was turned on Night 1 could explain his revised thoughts on the issue.

 

[nickel652]

I don't believe I have ever read so many back to back to back meaningless posts than that! You people need to go to bed earlier or remember your meds.

I'm going to review and place my final vote. I won't be here for nightfall, I'll be heading to the aquarium around 2 and won't be back until around 9.

hahaha have you not read half of the conversations between LG and NJ!!! hahaha

 

[Hooked Newbie]

Well, since NJ isn't going to be around and I doubt I'm going to get any response from her... I retract my vote to lynch NJ and vote to lynch Ice. I honestly don't see evil from pappy, but with the way this game has gone he could be and I just don't see it. I believe that there's at least one vet on the terrorist team. I say that, because they have capitalized very well on the chaos and blended extremely well. I am voting for Ice because looking back at yesterday, he jumped onto JL real quick after my post by just qouting one other of JL's posts and then mine and saying "you stole my thunder... lol". Not a great case, but it's all I've got.

 

[bkw1982]

Yes because it's worded that the sniper will take them out if they reveal themself the swat can reveal themself safely.....cause the sniper is dead, by the hand of the terrorist :wall:

 

[Madcrawdad]

Yes because it's worded that the sniper will take them out if they reveal themself the swat can reveal themself safely.....cause the sniper is dead, by the hand of the terrorist :wall:

Good news.

SWAT should have had 4 investigations by now, and unless their investigations are of dead people, they should have some info... even if it's innocent reads that can clear some folks.

Also good news in that to have a team, you need to have more than 1...so, there's more than 1 SWAT member still in play.

As mentioned by LG, assuming that SWAT has good info, one of the agents might consider coming forward (if not today, in the near future). If the Doc hasn't been turned, the open SWAT member should be protected, right? If the SWAT member, for some reason, isn't protected by the Doc, we can assume that the Doc has been turned, and that leaves a pretty clear trail to someone...

Also, SWAT members and Doc... if it looks like you're going to be lynched at any point, claim your role. It doesn't do the town any good to find out afterwards that they've lynched one of the PRs. Don't panic at two votes and spill the beans (as to your role). If it looks like your a goner, though, say something...

 

[jpappy789]

LOL



And the winner is _____________!!!!


This is very true but thats now waht he did for whatever reason

Well it has been fun pap

How would you know this? Did you help plan it with him?

Yes...and if you read the top (below), it says that there was a chance you wouldn't be home before night, which means you were content to ride that vote.


------------------------------------------------------------------------



You're wrong, Ice. The case I made against JPap isn't weak at all... there's the possility that it may not be correct, but the case isn't weak...big difference.

On Day 1, Jpap brought up, and considered the use of a 'no lynch' vote. Normally I'm against a 'no lynch', but in this game (with the bomb transfer aspect) it could make sense. JPap saying so on Day 1, kind of had me leaning him slightly innocent at that point, as it sounded like good townie talk, and something that the terrorists wouldn't be urging, as it did have the potential to hurt their game.

On Night 3 (or 4?) when he came out against not lynching, it made me wonder what had changed. The fact that somebody was turned on Night 1 could explain his revised thoughts on the issue.

What had changed? We hadn't got a terrorist yet except for when the UD's happened and obviously we needed to. Sitting around and not lynching anyone would get us anywhere and would give the terrorists a free chance to pick us off. Well look what happened. They found the person with the bomb. Guess I was right after all...

 

[Lady G]

I feel like being creative:

Narrator: Welcome to this week's edition of...Guess what the evils are thinking! Now let's give a warm welcome to your host...Dreeeewwww Caarrey!

Audience applause

Drew: Thank you for joining us today on Guess What the Evils are Thinking. Tonight we have a very special contestant, Lady G. Lets give her a warm welcome!

More audience applause. Lady G enters from offstage.

Drew: Thanks for playing G. Now let's cut to the chase...what do YOU think the evil terrorists are thinking?

LG: Um, well I have this idea that people who voted for BadHaggis early are scumbags because I believe that the UD's were part of an overall plan.

Drew: Wow G, isn't that a pretty risky assumption?

LG: I don't think so. I believe in it 100%.

Drew: Well, let's hope you are right because this could turn out to be disastrous for the town. It seems like thats all the time we have toady folks, but tune in next time to see how this all turns out!

end program

:laugh::laugh:
OMG, Pap...THAT was funny!!!!

Good news.

SWAT should have had 4 investigations by now, and unless their investigations are of dead people, they should have some info... even if it's innocent reads that can clear some folks.

Also good news in that to have a team, you need to have more than 1...so, there's more than 1 SWAT member still in play.

As mentioned by LG, assuming that SWAT has good info, one of the agents might consider coming forward (if not today, in the near future). If the Doc hasn't been turned, the open SWAT member should be protected, right? If the SWAT member, for some reason, isn't protected by the Doc, we can assume that the Doc has been turned, and that leaves a pretty clear trail to someone...

Also, SWAT members and Doc... if it looks like you're going to be lynched at any point, claim your role. It doesn't do the town any good to find out afterwards that they've lynched one of the PRs. Don't panic at two votes and spill the beans (as to your role). If it looks like your a goner, though, say something...

I agree, also...IF it does look as though you are going to be lynched PLZ make sure you really look to be the one going, yes...do NOT come out if there is just a couple votes on you. The other thing....if it looks we are going to lynch someone you have investigated that is innocent let us know. This will only work though I believe if only ONE comes out so the Dr can protect you, if more then one comes out, we WILL loose one of ya.
Yes, it will be obvious if the Dr has been turned if the swat member that comes out is hit, and yes...that would leave a trail to a certain player.

 

[judgemax]

My gram has taken a turn for the worse, and I have functions that i need to attend, ..I have very little free time today, and have skimmed as much as i can. I am choosing to still vote HN, something is/was wrong there...I am simply trying to not UD, ..I hope to have a few hours in the morning to catch up, actually read, and make an informed vote.

i vote to lynch hn