Mafia 34-Time Crisis(the Play)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've got Jury Duty in the morning, a new job (for the summer) starting after jury duty and X-boy is sick.

For now, I think I would like to vote for DD. I vote to lynch DD.

Her response to jpappy seemed to me to be an odd backpedal from the post that was questioned. I can't point to one thing and say, this is wrong, but it's just the whole tone and volume of her response screams 'Uh Oh, better cover my rear' to me.

Like hooked, I'll throw out my list for now:

DD
Jpappy
Ice
Chill
Dawg

I don't know what this list is... except for most of the people actually playing at this point ;)
 
Dangerdoll said:
absolutely not.... I was asking Dawg why he had both Chill and Ice on his radar. I took him having chill on his radar for having his numbers screwed up and that he was busted with it by Ice.... but I was and still am unsure why he had ice on his radar.... or was it because Ice picked up on the numbers in the first place (I think that's what the explanation was).... which makes more sense to me? Chill slipping does.... I do find it odd that he would find Ice on his radar for knowing the numbers but do I believe it makes Ice in the clear, not on your life. I know Ice is a better player than that...
Click to expand...

I think I see what you may be getting at here DD. Do I think Ice and Chill are both guilty of being evil...I doubt it. Due to the fact they are calling each other out I doubt they are on the same team. Do I think Ice and Chill are both acting suspicious...absolutely.
 
Dangerdoll said:
I asked Dawg because he didn't give explnations and I am trying to see if peoples reasonings are making sense to me. Dawg mentioned Chills being on his radar but not Ice's at that post.

Ogre commented on it pappy, because you provoked him to.
Click to expand...

Dawg was questioning Ices ability to come up with the numbers at the time.

And from what I can see, actually its just right there, I directly asked YOU in that post by quoting you. Ogre jumped in on his own and answered.
 
Chill said:
My first concern with RB's post was not the number of players. It was the idea that if we didn't vote anyone we would in effect extend Day 1 and learn nothing. I'm not big on lynching innocents to gain information. The number of players was secondary because to even entertain the thought, or more likely to argue against it, I would like to know the odds. To do that I was trying to figure out how many bad guys there are. If you review last game I also posted questions about odds and objections to lynching innocents. If you want to lynch me for this I can't stop you but you should keep an open mind to other possibilities that might arise between now and nightfall.
Click to expand...

So you need the same questions answered again? In the last game, the number of evils was pretty apparent. I could see you asking questions about this earlier in the day, but the part that bugs me is that you spent a day and a half with meaningless roleplay and only posted a real post after called out on it. Then you posted a "I'm confused" type post.
 
IceH2O said:
Its a 3 team terrorist with the possibility of becoming 5 with the turn and if they find the sniper to communicate with. I don't see it as being 3 total, just not enough IMO.

Sorry I just can't see where you pulled 17 players out of the air the way you did.You can't even tell us why you chose 17 players lol how am I supposed to figure out how you came to that number?



Its the Terrorist team/Sniper vs the Swat team/DR and the rest are innocents.
Click to expand...

Wish I could. I really wasn't asking you to explain something I can't. My point was, for your theory (that I slipped up and subtracted the terrorists) to work there must only be 3 terrorists. By your own admission 3 terrorists doesn't make a lot of sense, so maybe your theory is wrong. Sometimes a mistake is just a mistake.
 
WTH.... going with my gut.

I vote to lynch Chill.
 
Wow... I heard something pop, and just confirmed. It was my brain.

:O
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
AquariaCentral.com
Top Bottom