Mafia 34-Time Crisis(the Play)

[IceH2O]

Quick morning skim to answer anything thrown my way. I didn't work Friday so they borrowed my van and I don't know who/when/how they plan on getting it back to me or having me picked up.

If I have time I'll read through and comment but most likely won't be till tonight.

Wish I could. I really wasn't asking you to explain something I can't. My point was, for your theory (that I slipped up and subtracted the terrorists) to work there must only be 3 terrorists. By your own admission 3 terrorists doesn't make a lot of sense, so maybe your theory is wrong. Sometimes a mistake is just a mistake.

I'm saying you could start with 3 because you are adding 1 and have a sniper which really puts it at 5.

I don't see anyone easily mistaking 17 for 20 thats a far stretch to me...



Pappy seems to be defending Chill quite a bit it bothers me.

I'll go ahead and post my list of suspected
Chill (the number slip from what i have seen from chill he is better than that although i would hate to see chill go i really enjoy the role playing)
Jpappy ( seems to defensive of chill like he is trying to protect him)
Ice ( i'm think in you are just voting to vote someone like you don't really need a reason to lynch some one you just want blood)

I vote to lynch Chill

This is hilarious. I'm voting Chill because I want blood but you're voting him for the reason I brought my lynch vote to Chill.Does that mean you are just looking for blood?

 

[IceH2O]

I wanted to comment on HNs suicide pact.

I think its way to early for something like that. What if they are both innocent then we lose 2 off the bat plus the 2 night hits for a total of 4 players on a hunch? I'd rather we had something more concrete then that.

 

[IceH2O]

A quick skim through,man you guys posted a lot last night, and I'm sticking to my vote unless someone thats available can pressure Cap some more. His post of his list and then following me with his vote contradict. If someone can keep the pressure on him so I can read his responses before tonights vote I would appreciate it. If I feel him to be a terrorist then I'll jump off Chill onto Cap.

His post/vote just made me feel like I might be voting wrong.

 

[OgreMkV]

I was at a wedding too, man catholics know how to throw a reception! You weren't in Ferriday were you, because that would creep me out.

Nope, Jennings... sigh

I wanted to comment on HNs suicide pact.

I think its way to early for something like that. What if they are both innocent then we lose 2 off the bat plus the 2 night hits for a total of 4 players on a hunch? I'd rather we had something more concrete then that.

I'd like to comment on HN suicide pact. Has anyone considered the point that Hooked might, suddenly be all over this thing because he's trying to protect the Boss from being lynched?!?!?!

Chill gets a few votes, then he's out of the gate trying to kill himself and LadyG. That's TWO days of lynches out the window if this happens.

Since BKW missed it earlier I retract my vote on Zsand and vote to lynch DD.

Pretty sure I'll change to chill soon.

 

[ZSandmann]

Mad's either ignoring me completely or gathering some killer post with which to squash me with. I'll give him some more time.

Veterans will likely note that one day one posts I tend to vote against someone who's not likely to die, as a result of my one vote. I'm not looking to take out anyone on the first night when I don't have any real info, so that's why I usually do. And Mad's looking good for my token vote. Since the bandwagon is elsewhere, even were I to vote him, he'd likely be safe for another day.

Which, though is not meant to say that I don't have reason to suspect him. The way both he and Lady G came out of the gate looking for someone to lynch, and then the interesting dual defending/attacking situation, are my reasons for surely wondering. That and especially why he isn't saying much (yet.) It might be coming though. But I do have reasons to vote that way, were I to vote that way.

Holy carp, I think I understood about half of that, and it seems to make the most sense so far! Darn you all... I think I'm sticking with my token vote! I don't want any day one blood on my hands...

Well nothing new really to report. I can't pick a side at the moment because the last statement, I thought cleared Lady G, but HN's rebuttal was also very altruistic and convincing. I suppose it's possible you are actually both innocent and stuck to your guns about your gut instincts, and zealous in the hopes of trying to save the town. Or I'm being played like a record here.

Anyway, with no defense and little likelihood of a kill vote, I cast my vote for the ever suspicious, crafty minded, superior playing Madcrawdad. He eats strategies for breakfast, and sooner rather than later, I'd like to get some concrete feelings/facts on him. And I'm sure he's in hardly a position of threat tonight. I am more interested in finding out what tomorrow's kill vote reveals... lots of votes on Chill for sure. :/ Kind of happened fast, and out of nowhere. I'm definitely not happy with it, or 100% behind it, therefore I don't feel I can vote for it. But I'll be interested in the outcome. Good night all.

Oh I don't think I did that right. I vote to lynch Madcrawdad.

Geez, you took long enough. *lol*

I hate having to respond to what, 10 responses at once, and I can't spend too much more time on it since you weren't able to reply until I conveniently moved to vote for you. (By the way, it's one vote buddy, I doubt if you should lose any sleep over it. Were I in for the kill, it'd be much easier to move for Chill.)

1) 100 post thing... never heard of it...? But I suppose it's good to know.

2) My post was a reference to being unexpectly thrown in to the game, so I don't see why it should raise any suspicion. Maybe it looked different to you, but that's POV and I don't see why it would read any differently.

3) Sure, I consider a preliminary vote where one at first votes for someone, and after more revealing information, changes the vote where more guilt lies. Or has this too changed since I'm so out of touch?

4) Because I am not sure, I am not out for blood, and I wanted to give you time to change my mind.

I don't agree that my efforts are transparent though - I am trying my best here not to lynch an innocent.

I read through these posts all the time thinking to myself... if I ever said something like this I would be tied to a rail lynched so fast my head would spin. However, in your case I am not sure how to interpret it. The point of the game is to lynch the bad guys. Throw away votes do not help the town achieve this. I understand it is early in the game and there is not a lot to go on, but you should still vote for the person you most suspect. We have all lynched an Innocent or two, or twenty. It happens, but we get information based on who votes for who and why. Your vote is quite clearly there just to dodge having to make a choice. But BKW said there was not to be any UDs Tonight, so why vote at all? In my opinion if you are not willing to vote for someone that has a chance to be lynched, that is the same as voting No One Tonight.

 

[ZSandmann]

There are a few head to head battles going on currently.

Lady G vs. HN : Of the two I would rate LG a higher chance of being a Terrorist. But I don't honestly see a lot to go on here and I am not willing to join HN's pact as it risks losing two Innocents and taking away two Night's lynchings from looking for real Terrorists.

Chill vs. Ice : A much more grounded battle IMO, I have not seen anything I would consider a reasonable excuse from Chill regarding 17-Gate. It looks like a slip, an old school evil tell. The down side to this heads up though is that if Chill is a Terrorist that does not automatically clear Ice in my mind. As this seems to be a big slip and a smart Terrorist would jump on it for distancing reasons.

 

[Chill]

I don't have a reasonable excuse I don't even have an unreasonable one I'm not sure where I got the number. I also haven't seen a reasonable explanation for slipping on this number. Ice's idea that I'm subtracting the terrorist doesn't make sense to me. Three terrorist would just be too small a group even with an oppurtunity for one later turn.

I agree Z a smart Terrorist would jump on it for distancing reasons, however, a smart terrorist could also jump on it as a way to get an innocent lynched. I have no real problem with being lynched tonight just as long as the town learns something from it.

 

[Hooked Newbie]

I'd like to comment on HN suicide pact. Has anyone considered the point that Hooked might, suddenly be all over this thing because he's trying to protect the Boss from being lynched?!?!?!

Chill gets a few votes, then he's out of the gate trying to kill himself and LadyG. That's TWO days of lynches out the window if this happens.

Since BKW missed it earlier I retract my vote on Zsand and vote to lynch DD.

Pretty sure I'll change to chill soon.

I have no problem with Chill being lynched (sorry Chill), but I have stronger convictions about LG.

I guess going by your theory, you could be trying to protect Lady huh?

 

[dirtydawg10]

I'm not so sure about Chill at this point and my vote may very well change to him at nightfall if I see something more. My biggest problem with Chill's slip up is that there is no excuse. As has been pointed out 17 & 20 are not even remotely close to each other and he quoted RB's count of 20 in his post. Chill's defense of himself is "I have no defense". I don't like it.

The other thing I keep seeing is people calling HN...HK, HB, etc...when B & K are not even close to N. Are all of these people guilty too? The fact that Chill's may be a similar simple mistake is why I can't vote for him on it yet.

I will take HN up on his offer because it is the best thing I have right now and just in case I don't get to a computer before nightfall.

I vote to lynch Hooked Newbie

 

[judgemax]

Jeez, ..I am just kinda flabbergasted...what the hell do you guys think you are doing?..you are all playing like its night three and the game is hanging in the balance?..




Rb: I am concerned here "Big Daddy" where are you and your quips?..you are playing most differently!!

HN: Wow, ..HN, HK, HB, whatever your name is this week...what is going on, a spar with LG?..come on, ..and a suicide pact already?..what are you jumping out of the gate for so early?..If you were innocent, You wouldn't be lynching yourself, ..you would want to stick around and play...cause we all know HN would want to catch the bad guy, so, ..can't catch yourself, but you can
sure get yourself lynched huh? I know your personality well enough, that your laughing about this in a chat somewhere..."watch how far i take it, and they won't lynch me..."

Ice: LMAO, well, consistent you are, that is for sure

dd: I am not seeing anything out of the ordinary with her right now

mad:wow, ..i don't know who's worse, ..you or ice?..

lg: poor poor misguided G, ..your just as jumpy as HN, ..why so zealous?..

chill: chill, ..lmao, you did good your first game, ..now you seem lost, ..were you told to use your newbie card?..cause seriously, its only valid through game one?..

jenson: she is having an identity crisis, ..lmfao...

Zsand:seemed to have jumped right in feet first, ..lol, are you next to argue?..

dirtydwag:your feeling zealous to, ...

Johnlarson: I don't like playing with you, ..i can never figure you out

Cap: not much really...

ogre: lmao,..see what you started, ..noble ogre, ..hahahaahah

cam:?

jpappy:missed it that much eh?..

NJ: ( welcome back) I think you will find the game has evolved so much, that undercurrents are the norm now...its crazy how things have changed from original games, ..and how posting, not posting, and one simple line, can automatically make you guilty or innocent in the other players eyes...

Nickels:?

[AC] Rickets:????

[AC] BadHaggis: you just give your self away don't you?...