Just because I didn't come out and throw a vote immediately after nightfall, does not in any way mean I don't see him as evil still.
Mafia 34-Time Crisis(the Play)
- Thread starter bkw1982
- Start date
- Status
Just because I didn't come out and throw a vote immediately after nightfall, does not in any way mean I don't see him as evil still.
johnlarson66
These Pandas Rock
How about the votes with 3 people on them? It was not just the Chill train and then some single votes.
While I am sure at least on mafia was on Chill, am also sure that not one of them voted along with another.
I'm not dancing. It had to do with you and Mad, and how Mad at one point made a point at you about your postcount or something. Then all of the sudden you were supporting him, (though that might have been because he was suspicous of me, and of Hooked Newbie) and it looked like two moves mafia do: distancing, then joining up when someone else seems likely to go down instead. But honestly, that's how I remember it - how do you remember it? Do you remember it? You seem to remember nothing except I said you crossed the post, and responded to my question, after I had asked it. Or something like that. Whew, let's get a jury in here, I'm sure it's exciting and important reading, and will definitely give us some answers. 
You're kind of a one-trick pony though. Or a really bad record player. Next time you bring it up, bring the evidence or be prepared to be completely ignored - I've humored your request enough.
I'm lazy though. And I can't remember what you keep going on about.
I produced my statement on the page and the number, which is more than you seem able to do? I don't see anything even remotely guilty about it. If you're so concerned, YOU go back and reread it.
You're kind of a one-trick pony though. Or a really bad record player. Next time you bring it up, bring the evidence or be prepared to be completely ignored - I've humored your request enough.I'm lazy though. And I can't remember what you keep going on about.
I produced my statement on the page and the number, which is more than you seem able to do? I don't see anything even remotely guilty about it. If you're so concerned, YOU go back and reread it.
Hmmm, must of missed this post...
so are you just going to follow ice or is there an actual reason why you would consider me or dd terrorists?
[AC] BadHaggis;1471562 said:
so are you just going to follow ice or is there an actual reason why you would consider me or dd terrorists?
I haven't forgotten anything, but I'm trying to look beyond yesterday since we have more info. If you think I look scummy vote for me. LG's still on my list, but there are others that have my immediate attention.
I retract my previous comment on HN and LG until I see if they both vote for each other again...:silly:
I vote to lynch Dawg. Purely on principal.I probably will change, but might not. :silly:
I never supported Mad, you asked if a post he made looked like bandwagoning I said no, I'm not the only one to answer you on it either, although I was the one "supporting" him.I'm not dancing. It had to do with you and Mad, and how Mad at one point made a point at you about your postcount or something. Then all of the sudden you were supporting him, (though that might have been because he was suspicous of me, and of Hooked Newbie) and it looked like two moves mafia do: distancing, then joining up when someone else seems likely to go down instead. But honestly, that's how I remember it - how do you remember it? Do you remember it? You seem to remember nothing except I said you crossed the post, and responded to my question, after I had asked it. Or something like that. Whew, let's get a jury in here, I'm sure it's exciting and important reading, and will definitely give us some answers.
I'm lazy though. And I can't remember what you keep going on about.
I produced my statement on the page and the number, which is more than you seem able to do? I don't see anything even remotely guilty about it. If you're so concerned, YOU go back and reread it.
I've already brought the transaction out in QUOTES dear, so maybe you should rethink, relook or remember things.
I'm supposed to put up a list in the middle of all this, and the chaos that is the "morning" of two victims - one I definitely was not supportive, judged the case and correctly felt he was innocent, I might add.
Despite your pointless attacks Lady G, I can't really add you to this list because you seem so confused and because you're under the gun, and several hours in the intense interrogation room that is the Town Square will make anyone... turn their logic upside down and make all attempts to cast someone else in their place. So I don't really blame you.
Hooked Newbie was Judge's choice for Mafia. I usually side with her Clarvoyance. Would that be a weak reason to vote to lynch someone? Probably, but she was right before though I never found out how, and I can't figure out who to side with (except that I'm inclined to be swept along by HN's emotional self-sacrifice.)
Before I decide, I need to get just TWO minutes or so, that would be nice, to go back and see exactly how Chill went down. It's in their best interests to encourage the town to lynch an innocent. No matter how complex things get, that simple truth can't be tossed out.
Despite your pointless attacks Lady G, I can't really add you to this list because you seem so confused and because you're under the gun, and several hours in the intense interrogation room that is the Town Square will make anyone... turn their logic upside down and make all attempts to cast someone else in their place. So I don't really blame you.
Hooked Newbie was Judge's choice for Mafia. I usually side with her Clarvoyance. Would that be a weak reason to vote to lynch someone? Probably, but she was right before though I never found out how, and I can't figure out who to side with (except that I'm inclined to be swept along by HN's emotional self-sacrifice.)
Before I decide, I need to get just TWO minutes or so, that would be nice, to go back and see exactly how Chill went down. It's in their best interests to encourage the town to lynch an innocent. No matter how complex things get, that simple truth can't be tossed out.
I just find it strange that when someone is so adamant about someone being evil that they are willing to get voted out for it...then the next day that person drops of their "immediate" suspect list...I start to think.
So what was this new information that has your immediate attention?
Thanks for making my vote easier this time around...
I vote to lynch Hooked Newbie
- Status
