Mafia 34-Time Crisis(the Play)

Status
Not open for further replies.
THIS.

I asked a question... you answered it... while I was still asking about it. I acknowledged a couple posts later that you had INDEED answered my quesiton - but I hadn't SEEN it becuase I was posting at the same time. Seriously. If you want to lynch me, please DO so, or MOVE ON please.

OMG, you KNEW I answered that question if you look up above you said asked why I was sticking up for him.
LMAO!! It's quoted right above in my past post what was said, you knew I answered the question which brought on the whole I was sticking up for him and you thought we were on a team...WOW, again WOW!
 
This is too crazy even for me, so I'll present a few things which lead me to my vote:

I vote to lynch BadHaggis.

With any luck tomorrow, I'll barely be around, like some other people manage to be doing just fine (RB, etc.)

[AC] BadHaggis;1470082 said:
wow, lots of fandamily parties this weekend... just finishd mine.

i think that lots of the early fights havnt shown much, yet. chill does look scummish, could just be hard water spots...

pappy, i question why you're so focused, receiving or giving instructions?

i duno hooked, rb is scummy when good, and scummy when bad, i also think hooked was better voting for chill than lg.

this isnt final. but i vote to lynch chill.


[AC] BadHaggis;1470167 said:
i agree that ogre helped. my feeling was its to early to turn day1 jokes into something drastic.

i am happy to lynch lg :grinyes: but the new playas need to not get distracted by hooked and lg flirting:lipssealedsmilie:



you say you cant be 100% behind the reasons for Chill but yet the person you are voting for you would like to get some concrete facts on him...meaning you have none....Chill is the only one who put something out there...being it a mistake (which i dont get how it could have been) or if there is something behind it....its a reason
 
Well, I'm sure this is no surprise but I vote to lynch NeonJulie If you are going to post something please know what you are referring to, when answering someone...make sure the answer hasn't already been posted above and change your story when it is right there, that, that is NOT what you meant. If you are innocent, I will be very surprised.
 
Now, I have to go get my girls...bbl.
 
OMG, you KNEW I answered that question if you look up above you said asked why I was sticking up for him.
LMAO!! It's quoted right above in my past post what was said, you knew I answered the question which brought on the whole I was sticking up for him and you thought we were on a team...WOW, again WOW!

No. If you see it that way, you're just baiting me at this point. I told you exactly what happened. That I even GAVE You the benefit of the doubt by admitting I might have been wrong about you and not giving you enough time to respond... and look what it did me. Maybe people are right, and you don't deservce that benefit of the doubt.

Aren't you even the slightest bit interested in absolutely anything that led to something? The lynching of an innocent, etc.?

Buenes noche.
 
Tell me why page 2 posts like this wouldn't warrant at least a preliminary vote?

I would have to say because it seems more like a joke then anything???

What...you want everyone to vote you, but you wont vote yourself??

NO, I do not see it as a bandwagon approach NJ.

I do wonder why you stick up for someone who sort of gunned for you earlier...

Your funny, you asked a question and I answered it...how is that "sticking" up for Mad??
It's right here, there was no cross posting here. I am "baiting" nothing, you have posted so many questionable things...and you don't even know what you mean after you posted it.

I am done with this, I see evil here...as far as the lynch of an innocent...wasn't it you who didn't want "blood" on their hands, you see...I'm pretty sure you KNEW he was innocent, plus I know what happened, he posted a number that was wrong everyone jumped on it.
 
I am a little puzzled over this whole LG/NJ argument...for one I can't even see what started this whole mess and two, I don't even understand what they are saying within posts because they get so caught up in snide comments and arguing for argument's sake. What is interesting is that after all that NJ puts a vote out on BadHaggis and just quotes a couple of his/her posts and one of nickels w/o any analysis....NJ seems scummy to me as of recent.
 
A couple of things I noticed yesterday, said by Hooked Newbie, that seemed a little inconsistent...


Not that it really matters, but who do y'all think the alias players are?
Here HN tosses out the idea of trying to figure out who the aliases are. Says that it doesn't really matter, sounds like maybe just a fun way to pass the time early on.
I don't really see where it matters who they are. Why so worried about it guys?
Ice questions why it matters who the aliases are.


Ice- IMO, who they are doesn't matter, but the fact that they chose to use an alias does. It tells me that they may want to use it to change their posting style and hide behind us not knowing who they are.
HN replies that it doesn't matter, but goes onto explain that the fact that players chose an alias does. Kind of sounds like he's taking the stance that aliases do actually matter. This seems a little inconsistent with his original statement that it really didn't matter. Not a major inconsistency, but of interest, as it looks like he's changing positions slightly, when confronted.

-----------------------------------------------------------
The next inconsitency is with regard to Chill.

Do I see some protection going on? Or is it backtracking by Ice?

This has been an interesting exchange. I'll go ahead and be the first to post a list. I don't care if anyone else does or not.

Lady G
Chill
Ice
Jpappy
Here HN throws out a list of suspects that includes Chill.

WTH.... going with my gut.

I vote to lynch Chill.
HN actually goes on to vote for Chill... he later retracts and goes back to vote LG.
I have no problem with Chill being lynched (sorry Chill), but I have stronger convictions about LG.

I guess going by your theory, you could be trying to protect Lady huh?
After returning to vote for LG, he still points out that he finds Chill scummy.
Well, a whole lotta nothing lately. I would agree that CatHaggis looks suspicious as will Ice and DD if Chill is innocent. NJ looks like she's tiptoeing through a mine field. I'm not sure if it's because of her role this game or the last game she played. Dawg's safe out may be shady too. Granted, I offered it, but the way he eventually got to the vote in that post looks odd. I still believe G is a terrorist and won't be moving my vote. These are just my thoughts. I want to get them out there in case folks take me up on my offer or they decide to hit me.
Here, later in the day, he's naming possible suspects. The biggest point of interest is that he says 'CatHaggis looks suspicious as will Ice and DD if Chill is innocent.'

What's this? HN voted for Chill at one point, and even after returning to LG says that he would still support a Chill lynch. Now if Chill ends up innocent he'd be suspicious of Ice and DD. Why?


These inconsistencies, coupled with his very extreme position on the suicide pact he was pushing with LG has me watching HN EXTREMELY closely.
 
I am a little puzzled over this whole LG/NJ argument...for one I can't even see what started this whole mess and two, I don't even understand what they are saying within posts because they get so caught up in snide comments and arguing for argument's sake. What is interesting is that after all that NJ puts a vote out on BadHaggis and just quotes a couple of his/her posts and one of nickels w/o any analysis....NJ seems scummy to me as of recent.

Sorry to "puzzle" you. I asked a question she danced around saying everything but a answer to the question, it really wasn't that big a deal in the beginning, but the more she refused to answer the more it became. I agree she is scummy. I still also have a strong feeling with HN, and if need be would switch to him.
 
I'm not dancing. It had to do with you and Mad, and how Mad at one point made a point at you about your postcount or something. Then all of the sudden you were supporting him, (though that might have been because he was suspicous of me, and of Hooked Newbie) and it looked like two moves mafia do: distancing, then joining up when someone else seems likely to go down instead. But honestly, that's how I remember it - how do you remember it? Do you remember it? You seem to remember nothing except I said you crossed the post, and responded to my question, after I had asked it. Or something like that. Whew, let's get a jury in here, I'm sure it's exciting and important reading, and will definitely give us some answers. O.o You're kind of a one-trick pony though. Or a really bad record player. Next time you bring it up, bring the evidence or be prepared to be completely ignored - I've humored your request enough.
I'm lazy though. And I can't remember what you keep going on about.

I produced my statement on the page and the number, which is more than you seem able to do? I don't see anything even remotely guilty about it. If you're so concerned, YOU go back and reread it.

NJ, your facts are way off here. To say that LG supported me is absurd. If you disagree please pull the posts when you make these accusations to show WHERE, so everyone can see what you're talking about.

Secondly, to say I showed any suspicion of HN yesterday is equally absurd. While I was slightly suspicious of him yesterday, I chose to bite my tongue and just watch him for awhile. Once again, if you disagree, please pull the posts to show WHERE, so everyone can see what you're talking about.

Thirdly, this 'I don't want any innocent blood on my hands' is extremely scummy, along with your whole nonsensical vote for me (although you didn't want to really see me lynched). One of the ways to identify scum is by looking for blood on people's hands. While no townie likes innocent blood on their hands, scum REALLY dislikes having innocent blood on their hands...

For now, I vote to lynch NeonJulie
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
AquariaCentral.com