Ok, this is going to be a long one.
How exactly was I not thinking? Is it because I didn't think Chill was evil and it turns out I was correct? Sorry I didn't help lynch an innocent townie but take a look at your vote...you didn't vote Chill either. Doesn't sound like a great argument.
I tried to post a response to this last night before going to bed, but I ran into site maintenance. So, you didn't think Chill was evil? You had a good enough read on day 1 to be convinced he was innocent? Wow, bravo! I wasn't sure. I did vote Chill before a response from LG got me looking her way.
Oh...I forgot to ask...HN, how does Chill being innocent make LG innocent?
It doesn't. I've reviewed some stuff and seen something that makes me pause in going after LG. It could be smoke, so she's still a suspect but I want to look elsewhere too and not get so tunnel visioned.
A couple of things I noticed yesterday, said by Hooked Newbie, that seemed a little inconsistent...
Here HN tosses out the idea of trying to figure out who the aliases are. Says that it doesn't really matter, sounds like maybe just a fun way to pass the time early on.
Ice questions why it matters who the aliases are.
HN replies that it doesn't matter, but goes onto explain that the fact that players chose an alias does. Kind of sounds like he's taking the stance that aliases do actually matter. This seems a little inconsistent with his original statement that it really didn't matter. Not a major inconsistency, but of interest, as it looks like he's changing positions slightly, when confronted.
-----------------------------------------------------------
The next inconsitency is with regard to Chill.
Here HN throws out a list of suspects that includes Chill.
HN actually goes on to vote for Chill... he later retracts and goes back to vote LG.
After returning to vote for LG, he still points out that he finds Chill scummy.
Here, later in the day, he's naming possible suspects. The biggest point of interest is that he says 'CatHaggis looks suspicious as will Ice and DD if Chill is innocent.'
What's this? HN voted for Chill at one point, and even after returning to LG says that he would still support a Chill lynch. Now if Chill ends up innocent he'd be suspicious of Ice and DD. Why?
These inconsistencies, coupled with his very extreme position on the suicide pact he was pushing with LG has me watching HN EXTREMELY closely.
First, I do believe it matters who chose them. Not necessarily who they are. Something yoou even referred to as "the fact". By choosing the alias, we automatically start off with less info about them. Not past gaes to look back on, post styles to watch, etc.
----------------------------------
Second, Have your suspects not changed at all over the course of a long day 1? I'd be shocked if they stayed constant from anyone. I do think BadHaggis is probably most suspect to me right now and Ice and DD need to be looked at. Why wouldn't they? This "Ice is just Ice" is BS and if he is a terrorist, only allows them to keep a strong player longer. Please watch me closely, I'll be doing likewise. It's always kind of suspicious for someone to lay back until a night 1 innocent dies and then start making long "cases" on them.
ok so i just got caught up
hahaha no you are not the only one..i thought it was VERY odd that someone would put that then i read it again and saw what it actually said...
yes i have said that there is something about you....i also mentioned it was that you were both very defensive and offensive....but like i said it was just a feeling...and that chill was the one that made sence and had some reasoning behind it...i dont even remember who pointed out the number slip up....but that is all that mattered to me....so i wouldnt exactly say i FOLLOWED you on your vote...something was brought to EVERYONES attention and i saw the slip and made my decision...i dont see how that makes me a suspect...
after reading the posts since i got home...i dont get the LadyG and NeonJulie thing....
as far as suspects for me i would say....
Hooked for now
So, you really have only one suspect?
[AC] RICKETS;1471982 said:
I'm really looking at Lady, Hooked for a vote myself. I find it hard not to look on a threat/suggestion to vote for yourself as a stunt. The question is what was the purpose of the stunt.
NJ is not helping herself in my eyes. My other eye is on jpappy.
It wasn't a stunt. I've explained this. I was 100% convinced I was on the right track and willing to die for it. I'm less so now based on some recent stuff I've seen from others. Once most people stated that it was distracting and did not buy into the plan, I backed off of it. You, I don't believe, chose to say anything about it until now.
Well, this may be a huge thread , ..like back in the early games... glad I have time to keep read up anyway!
RB, ..I know you say your busy, but you last post, number 664, ..was the weirdest **** thing, i have ever read from you!! was that you trying to be helpful? you look guilty as sin to me right now.
HN...I have never seen you back track, yet, ..you have almost with LG..you came out guns a blazin, ..and are still telling everyone to lynch you..so, one of two things, ..your mafia, ..and its fun, or, ..you realized you don't have time to play?..whats the deal?..
haha well on my part im just retarded and still trying to figure everything out...so yeah i dunno im trying here...give me a break....jk
If you want to call my suspects evolving after night one back tracking, then I guess you have seen it. I have time to play. See above and previous posts to find out what the "deal" is.
the whole hooked thing...i dunno...just seems like he was all about the lady thing...then backed off (and i know he said people were saying they didnt like it and that is prolly why he backed off...) but yeah im still not sure who i am voting for...cause i just dont know!
![[AC] RICKETS](/forums/data/avatars/s/83/83432.jpg?1431345517){kind=avatar}
