Dangerdoll
Global Moderator
for the record, jm.. could you explain this bolded statement. I just want to make sure I understand what you are getting at here. I never mentioned jbradt's vote nor anyone else's... I won't even consider right now that jbradt's vote isn't the only vote to shank at this point... until I hear this explained that is...117
yes, i have been reading through them all.
jbrat's vote for rbishop has been posted numerous times
thanks, G, I used the word "freaking" myselfUmmmm, what?:huh:
Ok, I guess I see your point there...didn't really mean it hostile, and for the record my F's stand for "flippin" it's just a goofy thing for me really.

Maybe as the game progresses and we start to see things unravel, I can agree with that but for now... I think things are too up in the air and we can't be sure who to trust in the first place. With not knowing who to trust... how can we even begin to come together...I'm going back and forth with this whole say who we are investagating thing. First I thought, yes..it would be a good idea then we could see what direction everyone is going and maybe we could come together and get them...then that same thought is what makes me think maybe not. If the snitches know who we are investigating it could help them more then us at this point. I do think as the game progresses it would be the best way to come together, but at this point I'm not sure it wouldn't be more help to them then us. Does that make since to anyone? Now, definately if you use your invest and find a snitch it should be known IMO.
and yes, your post makes heaps of sense to me...
nice point on jbradt, jm... now you're working.you keep mentioning trust, but clearly in this game there really is noone you can fully trust, almost like you are trying to get the trust of others.