how funny is this that I was thinking you were one of the quieter ones in games past... tell me, how many times have you been the bad guy?
Your vote confuses me and it may be because you are new... but to vote on someone you started but did not end your thought with? While I agree with both of your thoughts here, I would think Jbrad was the more guiltier one because of the seeming experience he has as a newbie... but then you're a newbie too so just trying to follow your thought here.
Sorry I can't reply really to what I can't read... ?
The one question I read ok is how many times have I been mafia. Um, Game no. 4, Game 33 I think, I started innocent, was turned Mafia. That's it, most of the games I ended up Medic, or Detective, or Swat Team - or innocent.
The train comment is pretty weightless - I never said there wasn't a train - I just said I wasn't part of an LG train.
sorry, I think my post got screwed up for the quotes... not sure why it happened... system burps I suppose.
ok, so you've been mafia in 2 games to how many have you played? I think my point was the amount anyone posts to how guilty they are. You mean to tell me, in those 2 games where you were evil, you were more or less chatty than usual? I don't think it's the amount of posts that count but the slip ups in them. Yes, there is more of a chance with more posting... but then you never were such a high poster anyway... point taken... rambled thoughts.
The train comment is even more weightless now because there never was a train on G in the first place so why in the world did you bother mentioning it?
What if? What if that, and what if this, and what if you're actually guilty yourself? Anyway, LG was never in danger of a shank, and still isn't, so What Ifs are pretty useless at this point.
I am still very careful with my vote. I'm not switching it, or going along with the crowd over number Seventeen. I feel guilt, it's enough for my conscience to vote for, and it's night one, and I understand there are some risks.
It sure beats the past 6 mafia night one shank reasons though, IMO.
But weren't you talking about starting a train or G or trying to deny starting one? It seems to me that by mentioning it as much, it's the very thing you are trying to do.
one more thing... all mafia's have not had innocents voted out on the first night. There have been those that have gotten the mafia on occasion.... although very little, it still is possible.
Well.. *lol* I've had a lot more to say, than you. I have to repeat myself because people miss so much these days.
Why would you be suspicious if I feel a little protective of our newbies??
I never denied having too much or too little to say. Fact is I don't have time during the day to post as much as I would like to but that is neither here nor there. I nnever claimed to be the highest or lowest poster, personally.
Because it's been the experience of the games that the newbies, although being new to the game, have been given the role of mafia. They should be judged no less than the vets in the game. The only thing is, we don't lknow their game style to judge from... that, to me is enough to be more suspicious of them. Not more suspicious than anyone else, just more suspicious than counting them more innocent... if that makes sense.
Noodles, noodles, noodles.... yes, you were not seen so in the spotlight until you keep on mentioning the non-posters... what is up with that, girl... yes, they are not posting but as far as I am concerned, if they are not posting, we have nothing to go on.... so then we cannot waste our time thinking about them. Yes, they may be snitch's but my thinking is if they are not posting, most likely, the interest is very little because they have no role.... so there isn't a reason to post. Voting for a non poster is probably as good as voting no one. Yes, you might say well, low posters might be hiding, trying not to post so much to hide their possible slip ups but there is a difference between a low-poster and a no-poster if you ask me....
