You seem to really be bothered by this list; why so defensive?? I have no problem with someone posting a list. It helps the town to know what/how others are thinking, so how could it be a bad thing? (even tho I scored pretty badly!)
Mafia #44 Christmas At ACville
- Thread starter Rbishop
- Start date
You seem to really be bothered by this list; why so defensive?? I have no problem with someone posting a list. It helps the town to know what/how others are thinking, so how could it be a bad thing? (even tho I scored pretty badly!)
johnlarson66
These Pandas Rock
I am suprised to see noods vote for me. I expected DD to vote my way and maybe V2K. My vote staying on jpap has nothing to do with the evil smile. I think I posted why my vote was on him and I have showed a willingness to change it.
I think I have fallen victim to being too vocal on day one and can blame that on my demise. I hope that me having three votes does not put all of the attention on me and players stop posting their thoughts. I am curious of who else votes on me and those that don't who they vote for and why.
I will not change my play just because I have a few votes.
I think I have fallen victim to being too vocal on day one and can blame that on my demise. I hope that me having three votes does not put all of the attention on me and players stop posting their thoughts. I am curious of who else votes on me and those that don't who they vote for and why.
I will not change my play just because I have a few votes.
In post 285 (does not "quote" well) JL, you go on about Jpap questioning whether I played an evil or not yet you were happy to jump on board and "stir things up". I do not agree that Jpaps questioning and reasoning makes him an evil as I (obviously) post things and later come back with a correction, so I can totally understand it. I can see how looking back at older games where others were evil and check the playing style for changes or clues is a valid thought process.....
So you're saying that if she had posted the same list but voted, it would be fine?
I agree with some of it, disagree with other points...but so what, its her list, gives people something to think about whether they agree or not. The thing that caught me more was that in the same breath you are attacking people for not posting thoughts and hunches, and then attacking fire for posting a list and saying its an instrument of confusion. Its just a list of her thoughts, I don't see anyone asking you to buy into it. If nothing else, it will be something to look back on in a few days when we have some more information.
At this point, just about any statement made about players doesn't have a whole lot of backup, whether it be judgment based on past gameplay or the current one - we know absolutely nothing for sure, so any statement is nothing more than a hunch or gut feeling at this point.
johnlarson66
These Pandas Rock
I am bothered by the scaled list because I almost 100% disagree with what it states.
I am bothered by a scaled list on day one because there is no voting history to base anything on.
I am bothered by the scaled list on day one because I have never seen Fire do a day one scaled list and she has not posted much to that point.
I am bothered by the scaled list because after everything is said and done, she does not place a vote.
I am not defensive at all. I am not even bothered I am a 7. The reason I am a 7 is a joke. I think someone that is a 5 agreed with my statement about rb tweaking roles. I think others agreed. I have not stated "I think rb would make so-and-so the grinch". I stated that the roles could be tweaked. I will pull the post. I can think of much better reasons to be a 7. I could have been a 3 on the list, I would still be bothered by the list.
johnlarson66
These Pandas Rock
Can you see after he says it does not matter, but then goes and researches it, after you gave an answer. That is why I posted the long quotes. If it did not matter, why did he take the time to reasearch it and call you a liar. If it had no importance, then why look into it?
I agree with you and think that past roles gives an indication of how people might be playing this game. Not if they have been given a role this game because of their past roles (or lack of).
ok,maybe playing the "hunch"card wasn't the best idea for a newb,but if you look at noodles list,she list's Plant as a 6 "for no good reason",Me as a 6"because of a bad feeling",also voted to lynch Jl on just a hunch.Jl jumped me for saying the dreaded "hunch" word and im a newb,why did he attack me sooo hard when noodles has played the very same card.I keep my vote the same!I vote to lynch Jl
johnlarson66
These Pandas Rock
Yes, Noodles...that was the plan
--------------------------
JPap, in your quote below, you mention that who played what role previously doesn't determine anything in this game. I agree wholeheartedly.
Here you admit to looking through past games to see what roles Noodles has played.
Then here you admit to doing some MAJOR digging through past games to determine what roles Noodles has played. The question I have, is 'Why'? You said in the quote above that past roles are irrelevant, so it's more than interesting that you'd go through old game so thoroughly (or maybe not so thoroughly, as you incorrectly reported her as having never played scum).
--------------------
Another oddity is V2K's early vote for Dangerdoll. Here he throws an early vote for seemingly no reason.
When questioned on his vote, he claims to have voted for DD for the way she acts in posts. Okay.
Now keep in mind that this was DD's only post in the game before V2K's vote. This is how she acts in posts that drew his vote at this point?
I 100% agree with everything mad has posted in this post. Read the whole post to see what he is talking about.
