Mafia 46: In the Dark

I understand your reasoning on out of game information mael, but what you have to understand is that I had completely different reasons for voting for compared to gunslinger.

Not saying I did this, but what if I didn't have the nads to vote for you, and waited for someone else, why would that bring more attention to me? If that were the case, perhaps anyone who does that is just affraid of being called out and having a bunch of mafia men voting them out.

See my reasoning?
 
I guess here is what I am thinking.

IceH2O said:
Noodles I got nothing on noodles don't think they have done much either way
Ogre I got nothing on Ogre I hate that feeling :D
Mostlycichlids Quiet non contributing
Rich Quiet non contributing
Dawg Vocal early quiet now I have him as a suspect but its almost a bit obvious
DD I got nothing on Dangerdoll but she is not putting much into the pot either.
Jbradt I got nothing etc
Opi Ditto
Lucky Kind of like Dawg in that I have a suspiscion of Lucky for reasons already given
Cj No contribution
JL I have already talked about JohnL mild suspiscion
Jarred Contributing nothing.
LG Contributing nothing
[AC] C-note I have no read on their posts
[AC] Gunslinger If they wern't an alias which tends to mean someone who played a bit before I'd say leaning innocent. I am still saying leaning innocent though.
Click to expand...

While I'm at it I retract my vote to lynch Dangerdoll.

Discuss whatever lol.
 
Wow, lots of activity today. I've only been able to skim since I've been in and out of meetings and am now on my way to work. I've got to go back through and read carefully when more clear-headed.

For now though, a question for lucky: you were one of the ones berating Maelstrom for not explaining his vote... then you explain your vote on him with "I had a couple of thoughts". Care to elaborate?
 
luckydud13 said:
I understand your reasoning on out of game information mael, but what you have to understand is that I had completely different reasons for voting for compared to gunslinger.

Not saying I did this, but what if I didn't have the nads to vote for you, and waited for someone else, why would that bring more attention to me? If that were the case, perhaps anyone who does that is just affraid of being called out and having a bunch of mafia men voting them out.

See my reasoning?
Click to expand...

1) Meh.

2) Choo choo.

3) Your ingame reasoning which you have now posted is however more convincing than your out of game justification which you posted as an immediate reaction.

Its no biggy you are just a suspect to me.
 
[AC] Gunslinger;1812696 said:
DD, I just don't understand why mael has avoided flat out saying if the vote was random or not. Which is why I keep asking. Every post is a little bit more but he/she has yet to say exactly why...I'm done with it now as they've admitted that they aren't going to give anyone an answer (which is a very anti-town thing to do IMO).


Um, the communicating mafia and innocent teams perhaps?



I never put words into your mouth Ogre. If you can see, I worded what you bolded in the form of a question, as in I was asking YOU what you thought...I suppose "GunslingerZ" means that you think I am Zsand...comical.
Click to expand...
but when it was clear, what was the issue... I think the answer was given... you don't?

communicating mafia or innocent teams regardless, I dont think they should be in the AC Chat area discussing the game.... Communicators can discuss in an chat room outside of AC or in email, PM whatever they have.... why use AC chat.... silly move.
 
When I say convincing in my last post I mean less scummy as opposed to that it makes actual sense by the way.
 
Sure jbradt: As I said in my voting post, I found it odd that mael said that he didn't wish to present a case against DD. That means that he either doesn't want people to see his reasoning, or he has no reasoning but isn't brave enough to admit it. Either way, he is holding back something from ACville, and therefore does not have the intentions of tying to help the innocents which means that he has to be mafia.

And when you retract a vote, don't you need to say who your new vote is for?
 
luckydud13 said:
Sure jbradt: As I said in my voting post, I found it odd that mael said that he didn't wish to present a case against DD. That means that he either doesn't want people to see his reasoning, or he has no reasoning but isn't brave enough to admit it. Either way, he is holding back something from ACville, and therefore does not have the intentions of tying to help the innocents which means that he has to be mafia.
Click to expand...

This is a very very definite statement. Anyway hands up everyone who thinks I have not helped the innocents.

luckydud13 said:
And when you retract a vote, don't you need to say who your new vote is for?
Click to expand...

No.
 
Maybe I should say hands up who thinks I have not tried to help the innocents. By the way and mine is up already some lists would be nice. From those who are trying to help.
 
I dont think you have helped the innocents.

And as stated in the rules

b. If you decide to switch your vote, state in bold you are doing so and the new vote. (I retract my vote on XXXX, and vote to banish XXX)

I bolded underlined and italicized.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
AquariaCentral.com
Top Bottom