Mafia #47 "Ghost Hunters"

Vote count so far...

Doll-(1)-John

Tib-(0)-Ice

Pap-(1)-Ice
 
Wow, I really want to just do a big "reply all" saying you guys are really starting to bark up the wrong tree and are reading WAY too much into my questions and responses. Without all the messiness of a multi-quote...

1) I have been asking for clarifications for rules, NOT trying to limit anyones powers or try to appear innocent. I think it's understandable to ask for a clarification between ONE GH hit and a possible FOUR during one nightfall as I already explained. I also think everyone should know which one occurs, which is why I asked. I'd rather not PM just out of personal preference, also everyone gets to see the response. I know the mod can decide to post the answers...yadda, yadda, but honestly asking for rule clarification isn't new to the game. Just so happens I asked two so far nothing more than that.

2) I honestly don't see any defensiveness. Only questions and responses, the name of the game. If someone asks for further explanation about another persons hunch, how does that automatically become defensive? Not sure.

3) To DD's last post: the response to JL twisting my words was legitimate. He said I was somehow trying to limit the GH's power. For further explanation read #1. Second, I wasn't the only one to question your logic about Charlie and the alias. I just went a question further and asked "why" you were thinking that. What is the harm in that? Lastly, the thing about Opi/Lucky was a complete joke.

4) I'm concerned that suddenly people have been "noticing" things about me. First DD, then Ice, Ogre, Noods and JL is the order as far as I can tell. It's strange to see people follow each others though process this early in the game. I'm sure someone will say this is more defensiveness but I see it as just plain out of the ordinary...
 
Lady G,

Rule 2 says:

2. Whoever has the most votes will be lynched, in the event of a "winner" will be randomly chosen.

Can you explain this rule?

j/k I am pretty sure you meant to say:

2. Whoever has the most votes will be lynched, in the event of a tie the "winner" will be randomly chosen.

I thought jpapy would want to know.

:lipssealedsmilie:
 
Whoa, jpap, take it easy man.

... are reading WAY too much into my questions and responses...

I am pretty sure the above is "the name of the game" on day one. People have absolutely nothing to go on...so clearly shredding one person's posting is better than nothing. I wouldn't read much into it, everyone has to be the victim of poor evidence at some point.

Apparently, people are more comfortable with accusing you than the "panda hypothesis". :)

Me? I'm still all for the panda theory...which I believe makes Lucky & I innocent and everyone else evil (in my mind, anyway)...lol.
 
Well I just got finished reading 7 pages about panda's.

Not to make excuses, but I've had the flu, so most of the info in my head is alfully foggy.

No real comments on anyone. Surpirsed that there were actually votes today..........

Hopefully tommorrow will bring more promising information.
 
3) To DD's last post: the response to JL twisting my words was legitimate. He said I was somehow trying to limit the GH's power. For further explanation read #1. Second, I wasn't the only one to question your logic about Charlie and the alias. I just went a question further and asked "why" you were thinking that. What is the harm in that? Lastly, the thing about Opi/Lucky was a complete joke.
I've learned the hard way, that there can be no jokes on day one. I said some stuff last game, that I was immediately apprehended for. I feel that you should know this J, seeings how your a veteran.

Although it was a joke it was an odd thing to do.......
 
Lady G,

Rule 2 says:



Can you explain this rule?

j/k I am pretty sure you meant to say:

2. Whoever has the most votes will be lynched, in the event of a tie the "winner" will be randomly chosen.

I thought jpapy would want to know.

:lipssealedsmilie:

HAHA!!! Yes, that is what I meant :perv:
 
Whoa, jpap, take it easy man.



I am pretty sure the above is "the name of the game" on day one. People have absolutely nothing to go on...so clearly shredding one person's posting is better than nothing. I wouldn't read much into it, everyone has to be the victim of poor evidence at some point.

Apparently, people are more comfortable with accusing you than the "panda hypothesis". :)

Me? I'm still all for the panda theory...which I believe makes Lucky & I innocent and everyone else evil (in my mind, anyway)...lol.

LOL I understand that, I'm just a little frustrated that people are suddenly squaring in on me when I honestly don't where it's coming from. Oh well, I've tried my best to get answers out there. Right now I think I'm going to be going with my latest observations on the following (if anyone cares) so that's where I'm at right now...

Well I just got finished reading 7 pages about panda's.

Not to make excuses, but I've had the flu, so most of the info in my head is alfully foggy.

No real comments on anyone. Surpirsed that there were actually votes today..........

Hopefully tommorrow will bring more promising information.

game off///get better soon///game on
 
3) To DD's last post: the response to JL twisting my words was legitimate. He said I was somehow trying to limit the GH's power. For further explanation read #1. Second, I wasn't the only one to question your logic about Charlie and the alias. I just went a question further and asked "why" you were thinking that. What is the harm in that? Lastly, the thing about Opi/Lucky was a complete joke.
I've learned the hard way, that there can be no jokes on day one. I said some stuff last game, that I was immediately apprehended for. I feel that you should know this J, seeings how your a veteran.

Although it was a joke it was an odd thing to do.......

What I know is that day 1, especially long ones, pretty much always start out as meaningless banter. I understand that sarcasm is lost online but for anyone to group a team together based on the feelings toward an avatar is so ridiculous in of itself that I thought the point would be made regardless. Maybe I was wrong.
 
AquariaCentral.com