2. Whoever has the most votes will be lynched, in the event of a "winner" will be randomly chosen.
... are reading WAY too much into my questions and responses...
3) To DD's last post: the response to JL twisting my words was legitimate. He said I was somehow trying to limit the GH's power. For further explanation read #1. Second, I wasn't the only one to question your logic about Charlie and the alias. I just went a question further and asked "why" you were thinking that. What is the harm in that? Lastly, the thing about Opi/Lucky was a complete joke.
I've learned the hard way, that there can be no jokes on day one. I said some stuff last game, that I was immediately apprehended for. I feel that you should know this J, seeings how your a veteran.
Although it was a joke it was an odd thing to do.......
Lady G,
Rule 2 says:
Can you explain this rule?
j/k I am pretty sure you meant to say:
2. Whoever has the most votes will be lynched, in the event of a tie the "winner" will be randomly chosen.
I thought jpapy would want to know.
:lipssealedsmilie:
Whoa, jpap, take it easy man.
I am pretty sure the above is "the name of the game" on day one. People have absolutely nothing to go on...so clearly shredding one person's posting is better than nothing. I wouldn't read much into it, everyone has to be the victim of poor evidence at some point.
Apparently, people are more comfortable with accusing you than the "panda hypothesis".![]()
Me? I'm still all for the panda theory...which I believe makes Lucky & I innocent and everyone else evil (in my mind, anyway)...lol.
Well I just got finished reading 7 pages about panda's.
Not to make excuses, but I've had the flu, so most of the info in my head is alfully foggy.
No real comments on anyone. Surpirsed that there were actually votes today..........
Hopefully tommorrow will bring more promising information.
3) To DD's last post: the response to JL twisting my words was legitimate. He said I was somehow trying to limit the GH's power. For further explanation read #1. Second, I wasn't the only one to question your logic about Charlie and the alias. I just went a question further and asked "why" you were thinking that. What is the harm in that? Lastly, the thing about Opi/Lucky was a complete joke.
I've learned the hard way, that there can be no jokes on day one. I said some stuff last game, that I was immediately apprehended for. I feel that you should know this J, seeings how your a veteran.
Although it was a joke it was an odd thing to do.......
What I know is that day 1, especially long ones, pretty much always start out as meaningless banter. I understand that sarcasm is lost online but for anyone to group a team together based on the feelings toward an avatar is so ridiculous in of itself that I thought the point would be made regardless. Maybe I was wrong.