Mafia 52: Killer Comes A Courtin' (The Play)

I already said I likely would. You're not exactly predicting the future here Noodles. Weak.

Heheh. 'uneasy' is such a scum-tell word to use.

Anyway I said all my suspects were basically so weak as ought be considered random Noodles. Y'all continue being 'uneasy' though if you feel you have a reason to be.


uummm. ok!
 
it may not be much, but you seem really on-edge to me; the way you are making statements and judgments is very jumpy, like you're watching your back and ready to point a finger

cause I said I would wait and watch? that seems patient to me, not jumpy. not really watching my back, just watching the game. I fully expect to be taken to tonight. nothin new....:huh:
 
I find it funny how both you and Coler point fingers at me "following" and "cozying up" just because I agreed with vaild points some have made. Perhaps I should just lurk in the shadows like others and not say anything at all. Day one is difficulty to come up with a synopsis of who is who but the fog does seem to be clearing a bit.


None of those points were valid.

So MC called DD out on post count on Day 1. The pizza thing was old the 1st day.

My points were valid yes I agree.


I am a bit split on MC and thought about voting that way but with you and DD pointing fingers that way I wasn't sure if I should.
Then again you guys aren't voting that way so it could be distancing, which still makes you mafia.

I only was watching Coler bc I never trust him but once I understood we were speaking of the same thing I needed to look elsewhere. If I had been paying attention earlier you or DD probably would have gotten the vote. Since a vote on DD is wasted atm you are the only choice.
 
further more I am not voting Bugz because of the Pizza issue, I am voting her because I think her and MC are using it to distance eachother. however as things progress I am more and more inclined to move my vote elsewhere.


So then why Luv over MC? I don't have a vote tally in front of me but I'm pretty sure MC had more then Luv.
 
Yah Noodles. I said something like if I voted it would be in that general direction. You then appointed yourself as being 'top of my list'. ...and you edited what I actually said. Hang on til I go and find the full quote.
 
Of everyone right now I am inclined towards Noodles...and kinda JM as well...sorta feeling it for MC...and Kashta actually - but these are basically so weak as ought to be considered random and not based on anything useful. Insofar as its D1, unless anything better presents itself that's sorta where I will be putting a vote ultimately...if I do vote.

What I actually said.

What Noodles quoted me as saying :

"Heheh. 'uneasy' is such a scum-tell word to use.

Anyway I said all my suspects were basically so weak as ought be considered random Noodles. Y'all continue being 'uneasy' though if you feel you have a reason to be."




To be fair its not that Noodles actually failed to quote a full actual post I made. Its more that she failed to quote where I in fact did say I would likely vote in her general direction, or another of some named people.
 
Being clear. Noodles did not edit/shorten a quote of mine. She just quoted me selectively.
 
This sequence seems suspicious to me.

1. Agassizii shows up, makes one post, (presumably reads 9 pages), then doesn't follow that up with post after all.
2. Jpappy calls this "interesting."
3. MC suggested it does raise suspicion.

Is that interesting? Not really. Is that suspicious? No, I don't believe so. Not only is this Agassizii first mafia game here... it's a newly registered member to the site who doesn't know any of us (presumably). Perhap's this is someone familiar with mafia games elsewhere... there's no way of knowing that. Perhaps, they've been a lurker at the site for a long while before registering... can't guess much on that either. So the only impression I get from this (after discounting both of those) is I don't feel it particularly interesting OR suspicious that a new member AND a new player would take one look at the first 9 pages and not feel compelled to post again right away.

For MC to take a truly non-commital/unremarkable thing like Jpapp's comment and raise it up a notch from interesting to suspicious is..... well, suspicious. MC is trying too hard, IMO.



Quoting this not as anything significant, just noting that Coler's very high post count was well compressed into a very narrow period of time just before nightfall #3 when he already knew that game was won by the mafia.


I'm fairly suspcious about Luvbugs hoping to place a defacto scum association on me. Not because I think she was actually trying to get people after me.. but because she was trying to drum up interest against someone (anyone) instead of seeing if anyone actually DOES something suspicious first.


Nope.. it's not a 50-50 split in this game. It's either more like 75-25 or maybe 66-33. MC isn't trying to actually root out scum... he seems to be trying to throw out a LOT of noise that makes him appear to be helping the town when he's really just adding to our general confusion instead.



Luvbugz protests too much about mafia (really, the mafia?) trying to use her pizza comment against her. She did get everyone to glance at her because of it... but seriously, who's actually gone after her about it? Some valid questions were raised by several people.. but no one has bothered making that much of it. So... for Luvbugz to use this reason to justify voting MC doesn't seem to measure up to what she claims this to be. Ice (who voted Coler) and DD (who hasn't voted yet) both raised more of a thing over this than MC (who voted Dopehand) did. I think Luvbugz is looking for a safe place to throw her vote, more hoping to appear innocent for her own reasons than to actually help us ID the scum with just over 3 hours left to go before nightfall.

While I am leaning toward Luvbugz as well at this point, based on what I've pointed out here plus what Ice did, as well....

I vote to lynch MostlyCichlids.

MC seems to be working real hard to cast suspicion all over the place. So for now, he gets my vote. But I may also switch to Luvbugz after a while as I continue to keep tabs on this to see what develops (if anything).
Come on Kash, even with your explanation it seems you are voting to lynch me just because I am posting a lot more than most people. All I have been doing all game is just keep the discussion going, not to mention I have the next three days of work and am bored as hell. I would like a refrence of where I have been casting suspicion everywhere? I have only suspected Luvbugs and for the pizza comment...to this point that is prob the only comment that has raised any suspicion for me. As far as the 50/50 thing I should of thought it through better...maybe 75/25 or 66/33 Idk...anyway I thought it through and retracted my vote on dope because it was not logiacl to vote a UD...rather go after someone I have a little suspicion on.

I am gonna agree with this. MC does seem to be trying to make much noise and get others put in the spotlight. If it is not split 50-50 then he is most likley putting more innocents in the spotlight then mafias.

I vote to lynch MostlyCichlids!

Sorry that I have not been around much. I have been getting more hours at work lately and I'm taking whatever hours I can get.
Really? Who am I trying to put in the spotlight besides Luvbugs? This is the second time I have heard this? Not to mention Agassizii you havent contributed much to the thread at all then you come in and vote me, without much explanation except you agree with someones elses logic. I fell like I am being singled out because I have contributed to the thread more.
 
AquariaCentral.com