Mafia #53: The Great Mafia War- The Game

Status
Not open for further replies.
If we're going to lynch someone, we need to have a prudent reason for it. The point is avoiding mob rule after all.

Zaffy, should we assume you have played before?

First off, someone is getting lynched day one. So we ARE going to lynch someone. I would love to see a prudent reason for any lynching EVER.

My guess is that the lynchings that have had the best reasons have resulted in innocents being lynched.

The point is to lynch the mafia before they out number the innocents.

So what would be a prudent reason for voting for someone on day one?

Posting too much?
Not posting enough?
Not posting at all?
Not voting?
Not asking any questions?
Asking too many questions?
Claiming they are innocent?
Defending others?
Changing their avatar?
Using an alias?
Visiting other players profile?

Yes, please share with us what you prudent reason would be for voting someone on day one.
 
JL, just because someone is getting lynched doesn't mean we have to vote randomly. Day 1 is what it is, but having some reasoning behind our votes is better than just randomly selecting someone because "someone has to go".

And it gives us more to talk about than "I just voted randomly."
 
Woo JL, you came out of the gun today. Are you still sore I saw right threw your scum butt? I think so.

Why would I be sore, we wacked you and won. If anything your pointless accuastions of me and rich actually helped us because you had no real meat behind your accuastions. It was just a crazy person talking nonsense. No one listened to you. I think if anyone is sore it is you!

As far as coming out of the gun, I am just particapting when I can.
 
I didn't make myself clear, of course we're going to lynch someone tonight. But I'm saying that the person we lynch should deserve it. For example a person who seems eager to lynch another for some petty reason should perhaps be lynched himself.
 
JL, just because someone is getting lynched doesn't mean we have to vote randomly. Day 1 is what it is, but having some reasoning behind our votes is better than just randomly selecting someone because "someone has to go".

And it gives us more to talk about than "I just voted randomly."

Well let's see how talkative old noods is with some votes on her. It is amazing how some players freak out when there is some heat on them. But if you see a better suspect, then let's see.

Who started all this back in the 80's talk anyway?
 
1981 eh? so I'm a fetus, should be interesting.

Also, howdy UhOhIceH2O :D

So here is the start of it all. ZS, the Mod of the last game. I am not even sure if he has posted again. I don't see how it being 1981 or ZS being a fetus makes the game interesting. I do see how the format being loosely set on real events occuring in 1981 and how the game has many twists is interesting.

Odd also that he would point out the alias, which of course puts doubt out there, but the choice to use an alias was made BEFORE roles were handed out. An alias has the same chance of being mafia as the rest of us. ZS knows this and I think it is suspect how he kinda throws UhOh out there.

Extra attention should be paid to ZS.
 
Yay! I was born in '82, so I guess my previous incarnation will play (maybe she'll post more ;) .

I vote to lynch Ogre.

Just because it's been so long since we've gotten to type that! hehehe!
 
I didn't make myself clear, of course we're going to lynch someone tonight. But I'm saying that the person we lynch should deserve it. For example a person who seems eager to lynch another for some petty reason should perhaps be lynched himself.

Perhaps so!

I am trying to think if there is "a person who seems eager to lynch another for some petty reason" posting yet.

If you see someone like that, then I HIGHLY suggest voting for them.

So have you played before? Is there a reason you failed to respond to that part of my post?
 
Well let's see how talkative old noods is with some votes on her. It is amazing how some players freak out when there is some heat on them. But if you see a better suspect, then let's see.

Who started all this back in the 80's talk anyway?

I see your point, but I guess it just seems that noods would be used to having votes on her by now. She seems to be a suspect in every game I've been in (or read), so why not pick on someone that it might actually shake?


OOO... maybe JL has been eating at noodles's spaghetti restaurant? :evil_lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
AquariaCentral.com