Mafia 54:Vampires Return (The Play)

[jpappy789]

uhhh... I think i've beenthe most 'committed' person in this thread.

I've never played this game before, I don't know any of you. Lots of you are going off behavior players have shown in previous games, why is that any difference than what i know about Zaffy? Previous games have nothing to do with the 'world' that exist in this game, so why are you basing opinions on that?

I suspect you jpap, and not heavily to be honest, but your one of the people on my list. I suspect you because you've flip-flopped a lot, very vocally, and you have not acknowledged your mistakes and adjusted your strategy so as not to make the same mistakes. That leads me to believe you have an agenda, not that your trying to root anyone out.

Good enough?

So why did you not say any of this before? Did the LV tell you what to say?

1) I've "flip flopped" because so far I've voted for two innocents. Yes, it happens in these games. Thus, I have to find new suspects based on their posts. I've always been a vocal player, ask anyone.

2) Which mistakes are you referring to...my votes? If so see #1 and I believe I have admitted being wrong on both DD and Noods.

3) Again, any new "strategy" is me trying to find new suspects. Thats how the game is played, you adapt to new information based on the previous nightfall. You, on the other hand, have been stuck on the same player which at the moment is a very meaningless vote.

If you call hunting for vampires having an agenda, than yes, I have an agenda.

 

[OgreMkV]

I vote to stake Rich

He said his vote would be on JPap if Noods came up innocent. That in addition to all his weirdness last night makes me think he's a vamp. Unfortunately I'm guessing he's a lesser vamp but either way we need to find out.

So you're theory is that Jpap is a vamp and Rich is last night's turn?

 

[lanimret]

So why did you not say any of this before? Did the LV tell you what to say?

Why do you want me to vote for you so bad? That's just weird man. I suspect Zaffy more , i'm not a mob mentality kind of guy. Why do you care who I vote for?

1) I've "flip flopped" because so far I've voted for two innocents. Yes, it happens in these games. Thus, I have to find new suspects based on their posts. I've always been a vocal player, ask anyone.

Don't have to justify to me, I'm not one of the people voting you out. I just have minor suspicions...

2) Which mistakes are you referring to...my votes? If so see #1 and I believe I have admitted being wrong on both DD and Noods.

The strategy you are using which to me appears to be analyzing the changes in people votes based on timing seems to not be working for you, but yet you are criticizing my strategy. Yet you haven't modified your own, and you have succeeded in leading the pitch fork brigade to lynch two villagers.

3) Again, any new "strategy" is me trying to find new suspects. Thats how the game is played, you adapt to new information based on the previous nightfall. You, on the other hand, have been stuck on the same player which at the moment is a very meaningless vote.

From what I can tell you've used the same strategy each time to come to the same wrong conclusions. So in fact, you are not adapting, you are process of eliminating.

Just because I haven't joined your marching band doesn't make me a vampire, it just makes me more sure than you are.

 

[jm1212]

uhhh... I think i've beenthe most 'committed' person in this thread.

I've never played this game before, I don't know any of you. Lots of you are going off behavior players have shown in previous games, why is that any difference than what i know about Zaffy? Previous games have nothing to do with the 'world' that exist in this game, so why are you basing opinions on that?

I suspect you jpap, and not heavily to be honest, but your one of the people on my list. I suspect you because you've flip-flopped a lot, very vocally, and you have not acknowledged your mistakes and adjusted your strategy so as not to make the same mistakes. That leads me to believe you have an agenda, not that your trying to root anyone out.

Good enough?

because the games from before are all part of the same "make believe" ACville mafia series.

why are you so reluctant to look at other people? your vote has been useless on Zaffy for the past two nights. your logic is convoluted and is not helping the town one bit. in fact, i would move to say that it is hurting the town because your voted is wasted when it could be used on someone that is universally more suspicious.

do you not want to draw attention to yourself as one of the people that decides or creates a tie?

 

[jpappy789]

I don't want you to vote for me, I am curious as to why you would not vote for a suspect on the chopping block instead of a worthless, singleton vote.

It's only day 3 and you are acting like any "strategy" I am using is totally worthless because we have not lynched a vamp. I don't know of any game where we lynched every scum player right away.

On the flip side, you have yet to be correct about Zaffy.

As I said to Jm, I don't see where I was leading anyone to lynch DD or Noods. Please show me where I could have possibly been urging players to vote either one of them...

 

[lanimret]

i would move to say that it is hurting the town because your voted is wasted when it could be used on someone that is universally more suspicious.

More suspicious? Like DD? Like Noodles?

Maybe it's not my logic that's causing the problem here.

Are you guys on the same team now?

 

[paperdragon]

in fact, i would move to say that it is hurting the town because your voted is wasted when it could be used on someone that is universally more suspicious.

Now that's interesting, what's to say one person is going to view someone as suspicious simply because everyone else does? I didn't think noods was suspicious, but she was on most players "universally suspicious" list. You see how that went over.

Not that I particularly think lanimret is right in his choice of votes, I just find your logic a bit unreasonable.

 

[jm1212]

personally, i see a single vote on one person to be a bit of a waste especially when the person has other suspects.

 

[Kashta]

For those who've missed my posts, I'm back in the thread. I had to work on something this morning that wasn't expected then had other things to do this afternoon. I've skimmed through from where I left off last night and it's just eerie how quiet it is here. I know other people are busy too outside of this game, but it makes the thread seem... well, strange.

I still think that stunt Rbishop pulled on us makes no sense. On top of that... it appears most folks have decided to let him get away with it. Bishop never gave any real explanation for doing all that so I need to go back to figure out why the tide has changed - as that's not what I was expect when I got back on today.

I'll post more later tonight when I have more time.

 

[johnlarson66]

I vote to stake Rich

He said his vote would be on JPap if Noods came up innocent. That in addition to all his weirdness last night makes me think he's a vamp. Unfortunately I'm guessing he's a lesser vamp but either way we need to find out.

I agree with this, but I want to vote jpap first. It makes no sense why rich was unwilling to vote jpap last night, but willing to vote someone he thought was innocent. The wierdness was just that, wierd. rich was aware of Rb's hint about jpapy with noods switch and then Rb's switch and he thought it was odd. From his posts leading up I figured he would've vote jpap, but he voted Rb instead.

The more rich posts, the more he seems like a vampire. The less Rb posts any information, the more he seems like a vampire. I think it is pretty appearent that jpap is a vampire. I wish could just lynch all three at once.