Mafia 55...Badlands Twisted...the Play...

OH...and Rocker, LMAO...yeah I had problems I usually do! You should of seen me when we all had "fake" name OMG!!:rofl:

I would also like to add, love ya too Doll :p:
 
Wow, this game is quite boring so far.

Z popped in with a vote and a short excuse to vote MC...that worries me. Too much going with the flow lately. I don't see too many people voting Z though so I might make my vote more useful tomorrow but its looking to be almost everyone on MC. Don't get me wrong, I still think he is scummy, but I'd hope for votes to be a little more concentrated than last nights yet still not all on one person...
 
I retract my vote for LG and vote to genetically test Zsand.

I do not like the fact that there are so many votes in MC and not on any other player, I would like to see more of a mix. Not convinced MC is innocent or not, just want to spread the love around. Z, I know there has been some weather down there but that short little post/vote with really not much else in the way of input is scummy......more later on my lunchbreak.
 
thru post 204....

to genetically test....

most (6) wyc 142 lady 163 DD 173 rich 180 zsnd 197 ann 198
dawg (1) rock 164
wyco (1) jl 152
jl66 (2) kash 175 most 178
zsnd (2) jpap 196 nood 204


all votes in....

Nightfall at 9 PM EST tonight....
 
Seems like Wycco is pretty sure I am guilty and has no "If JL is not guilty options."

Since I have no problem dying for my team of killing a teamate for my team I can see why a vote on me or my vote for someone does not clear anyone.

I think it is odd that Wycco has a JL is either guilty or guilty approach. What if I am not guilty Wycco?


So you accuse Pappy of skimming and then you skim yourself!!!!!

I was responding to Mostly Cichlids post where he changed his vote to you as if to say "this proves I'm not in league with JL". Obviously if you were innocent it would not prove a darn thing regarding MC one way or another because if MC were innocent- voting for you wouldn't proove anything.

If MC were guilty- he'd already know you were innocent and no risk to vote for.

I retract my vote on Mostly Cichlids and vote to genetically test JohnL.

There seems to be quite a bit of evidence building up:

1) You voted for a known innocent.
2) You made a lot to do out of the whole Bugz/Bubb2 incidence.
3) It could be said that you had the most to gain by Ogre being taken out. You were who he had set his sights on.
4) You've been skimming. (or deliberately ignoring facts).
5) You appear to be panicing under the pressure of votes.





Regarding ZSand, he has hardly posted- and it is concerning... it concerned me about him last game too- but it seems to be the norm for him. Kash's silence baffles me too- she's not normally so quiet.
 
I can't believe how slow this game is going! OMG, I finally get a game where I have more of a chance to play and no one is talking.

Noods, you seem to be changing quite a bit after other players? I do agree with the thoughts on Z...but it seems everytime someone comes up with a case on someone you jump to their vote.

Wont be on much till later, but wanted to get those thoughts in.
 
to genetically test....

most (6) wyc 142 lady 163 DD 173 rich 180 zsnd 197 ann 198
dawg (1) rock 164
wyco (1) jl 152
jl66 (2) kash 175 most 178
zsnd (2) jpap 196 nood 204


all votes in....

Nightfall at 9 PM EST tonight....
Does this conern anyone else? Two low profile players so far this game jumped on MC right after each other...

I could see annie (who has yet to play as scum I think) following a vet teammate but I'm not going to count on it. I just thought it was too weird not to point out.

I'm still more concerned with Z being very quiet.
 
It has been quiet, not that I should talk. I have been quiet even for me.

There has been some good points made. If we are worried about Z not posting then kashta must be on that list as well.

The more I think on it the less I like MC. I will go back and read and see what develops form all of this.
 
This just seems too easy. I retract my vote for MC and vote to geneticaly test
Lady G. MC is too obvious and most likely another innocent. LG had been "stickin out" quite a bit this time around. I am glad to see her posting more this game but her posts seem phony....
hhhmmmm - this puts me on the same page as MC. not sure this is where I want to be....more thinkin is required.
I think I need to call it a night and re-evaluate tomorrow...

I am certainly not concerned with "saving" MC. That fubar from him last night did just make it easy to vote for him but I would like to be a little more certain as I do not want to lose another innocent if we are wrong. In case you didnt notice I moved my vote to LG not long after my initial vote. the other votes did not pile on until today so no backpedeling was needed. Are you suddenly worried about the votes on LG?

You know what this makes me think "wonder"...you voted MC first off, then votes started building on him you pull off, is this because you know he will come back as innocent and didn't want to be on him?
Then you said you wanted to be more "certain" about your vote...so what made you more certain about me?

Ya know, I don't really like the train built on MC either....and although I can still see him as evil, I think I like Noods better for my vote. Her posting has been questionable, she seems to change her vote as others make cases and goes with what they say...

I retract my vote on MC and vote to geneticially test Noodles
 
AquariaCentral.com