wait a minute.. so your next guess of who might be mafia was me, but you investigated Z?? Looks like you are working on convenience here, I vote to lynch Wycco
Yes, I had Lady G as most likely- you as next most likely... and Z as very possibly. Because I was less sure of Z and considered him a player who would be very usefull to know the status of one way or another- so I could either take him out as an adversary- or have him as a known ally- I investigated him rather than the person who was a higher suspect on my list.
This is the second time I've had an investigative role- and both times I've frequently investigated who I thought would be more usefull to know the role of rather than my number one suspect.
Now as for you. I am a little curious as to why you jump to the conclusion you have. Yesterday you claimed if Lady G were innocent I must be guilty? Why? This isn't like the vampire game where you get turns.
Now you're saying I'm setting you up. Can you give a rational reason for why the journalist would attempt to set-someone up whom he didn't believe to be guilty?
That doesn't make any sense- it's almost as if you're admitting guilt.
I'd like to hear your defence- in the meantime- knowing you are almost certainly guilty I'd like to plan ahead for the next stage.
So, moving on... we've got four names left... who are unknown.
Rich
Lanimret
Judgemax
Zaffy
If the assumption that there were four mafia in each team that means, (now knowing that ZSand is innocent) that there is only one unknown innocent left... unless Wood was innocent- in which case all four of them would have to be guilty.
If Wood was guilty- than that means there is one undiscovered innocent.
Either way- hard to go wrong- more likely to hit someone guilty than innocent.
What will make things more complicated was if there were only three guilty mafia members per team. Although, that would help us because it would mean a mistake wouldn't cost us the game.