this idea (voting for JM) has produced a verrrrrrry interesting response imo
I agree, if it doesn't work, it still stirred the pot.
this idea (voting for JM) has produced a verrrrrrry interesting response imo
rbishop said:4) If you aren't active for two day/night cycles, with at least posting once, then you will pass away from some strange (probably embarrassing) illness that I will give you.
JM last posted on 07-21-2007, 07:39 AM EST.
Just got this from her profile, that's about two and a half days ago.
Mad- Pointed out he doesn't trust Mike, votes to lynch Swayde, says Mike looks even more mafia but still keeps his vote on Sway. mLastly he jumps all over Mike for 3 or 4 posts, but still stays on Sway.
Sploke- I don't really see anything mafia IMO. The JM vote was before it was brought up that we might could hold back an extra day.
Swayde - Again I don't really see anything here.
Clown Lover- Honestly I'm missing it here too.
Judgemax- quiet to quiet, I couldn't keep her from posting last game lol. She hasn't made a post on the entire site since Saturday morning though.
Charlie Stubbs - am I blind? Not really seeing it here either.
The only one I possibly see anything on is Mad, but even that doesn't 100% convince me. He could be voting Sway to cast suspicion on her to make us think not mafia but is riding Mike hard to keep us voting him because he is an innocent.
Need to watch more before I make a vote, still sticking to Mike for now.