Mafia 65: Masons and Mafia (Game Thread)

[Fishfriend1]

tex is gonna ud, i know it!

 

[ZSandmann]

I hope it was a hot prod

 

[Fishfriend1]

...

 

[Fishfriend1]

is it day still the first half of the day?

 

[jpappy789]

Ok, as crazy as this sounds I think FF actually has a point. JL said the mafia would want to spread the votes out so I guess one could then assume he thinks the mafia wouldn't want a train then. I may be totally misreading the whole issue...to be honest, I just skimmed through. I thought I would just post that as soon as I could.

 

[jpappy789]

There's nothing much more I picked up on while reading that over again, but I was a little taken back by Dawg's response to FF...seemed more over the top then what I am used to from him. I'm still not comfortable with FF saying that he somehow assumed I was innocent nor I am comfortable with how he got all OMGUSy with Dawg and subsequently JL.

 

[Lab_Rat]

texasguy has been prodded.

I hope it was a cattle prod. :rofl:

 

[Lab_Rat]

Heh, what I was talking about is the fact that there is no reason for the Mafia to let themselves be lynched. When things get overwhelmingly in their favor they can just start using their day kills until they hit a Townie. I would be surprised to see any Mafia actually end up on the final chopping block. It doesn't change my thoughts on voting early and often, it's just something we will have to expect.

Maybe I misread the rules but I think Player A would individually send in the hit, if they hit a Townie they die, if its a Mason, the Mason dies. I still think Player A would be lynched if the Mason dies, but the point is they take someone with them.

I see your point, I hadn't thought of that scenario, but I think it would be risky for the mafia. They would have to be pretty sure they're the one who is going to be lynched, doesn't seem worth it if it's a 7-7 vote, just waiting on one voter. It is something to keep in mind though.

Also, how hard can it be to see what i think.

I thought that you had said that the mafia would not focus on one person (even though they know who is innocent and who in not) and then dawg came in and jumped on me for it. Because of that i have put both of u on top of my 2 person list.

My list:
Dawg- for defending so soon and so fast
Jl- for being defended so fast by Dawg, makes me think of a team going on here.

U know if each group picks a diff person then there will be a 3 way tie, and a random lynch, that could work.

There's nothing much more I picked up on while reading that over again, but I was a little taken back by Dawg's response to FF...seemed more over the top then what I am used to from him. I'm still not comfortable with FF saying that he somehow assumed I was innocent nor I am comfortable with how he got all OMGUSy with Dawg and subsequently JL.

Seriously jpap? FF is the epitome of OMGUSy. If I'd voted for him I'd be on his list too. If you vote for him you'll be on his list. I'm still not sure what to make of him, but the way Dawg has gone after him has seemed much more scummy than anything FF has said thus far (though I can't really analyze his posts since half the time I'm ).

 

[Fishfriend1]

Seriously jpap? FF is the epitome of OMGUSy. If I'd voted for him I'd be on his list too. If you vote for him you'll be on his list. I'm still not sure what to make of him, but the way Dawg has gone after him has seemed much more scummy than anything FF has said thus far (though I can't really analyze his posts since half the time I'm ).

Gee thanks...

 

[IceH2O]

I see your point, I hadn't thought of that scenario, but I think it would be risky for the mafia. They would have to be pretty sure they're the one who is going to be lynched, doesn't seem worth it if it's a 7-7 vote, just waiting on one voter. It is something to keep in mind though.

We also need to be sure not to fall for any trap caused by a hit on a player voting on the lead candidate. The mafia could easily use this tactic to make us lynch an innocent.