Mafia 65: Masons and Mafia (Game Thread)

I forgot, I wanted to mention the bolded text too....not quite sure what this means.... is it he is talking about what little Mafia game experience or what little Mafia "ability" he has... that doesn't concern you, Lab?


I see your point...I read it as what little game experience he has, not as what little experience he has as being mafia scum. Never thought of it that way. Now that you point that out it is disconcerting...
 
with that, it's almost 2 am and I need to go to sleep.... if I were to vote, I have to say, with that mafia statement Tex had made and his absence, I have to say he is most concerning to me... I was set to vote either FF or Lab, Lab though, I am going to give you the benefit of the doubt for this for now however, this is subject to change depending onm Tex's responses to all this and whether I feel his explanations (if there are any) are legit or not....

for now, I vote to lynch Texasguy
 
Wiz, you seem to think that JL and FF are connected...so why vote JL over FF?

FF still has 3 votes, I believe, so I do not understand going for a single vote when it seems you also have a lead vote getter as a top suspect. Your vote would be a heck of a lot more "useful" that way.
 
Kashta has been prodded.

Ouch! You do that very well, Mad.

Well, I am here and very interested in the game. Just too sleepy to get much more done right now than a brief skim of the thread. I'll be back on in the morning and post.. probably a lot. There's a lot of detail here for me to think over and read through more closely.
 
Vote Count

Dawg (4) - Lab 65, JL 135, Tex 156, FF 160
FF (3) - Dawg 54, Daga 155, Ice 162
Tex (2) - Z 97, DD 273
JL (1) - Wiz 265


Not voting: Jpap, Razz, Zaffy, Kash, Annie

With 15 alive, it takes 8 to lynch

In the absence of a lynch by deadline (5 PM CST today), the player with the most votes will be lynched.
 
with that, it's almost 2 am and I need to go to sleep.... if I were to vote, I have to say, with that mafia statement Tex had made and his absence, I have to say he is most concerning to me... I was set to vote either FF or Lab, Lab though, I am going to give you the benefit of the doubt for this for now however, this is subject to change depending onm Tex's responses to all this and whether I feel his explanations (if there are any) are legit or not....

for now, I vote to lynch Texasguy

Wiz, you seem to think that JL and FF are connected...so why vote JL over FF?

FF still has 3 votes, I believe, so I do not understand going for a single vote when it seems you also have a lead vote getter as a top suspect. Your vote would be a heck of a lot more "useful" that way.


I'd also ask that of DD. Both of you have FF as a suspect,a player with 3 votes but you spread your votes onto other suspects with 1 or no votes on them at the time.

The whole basis of this game is to come to a town conclusion. At this time it really looks like a Dawg FF race. You either believe Dawg or you believe FF.

I find it a bit discerning those votes fell off to the side like that. All that does is spread the votes and if you believe Dawg is more likely innocent then FF or your vote choice you are still sending Dawg home.


I am willing to vote Tex or JL though if the town wants to go that way. But only if its a majority decision.
 
I forgot, I wanted to mention the bolded text too....not quite sure what this means.... is it he is talking about what little Mafia game experience or what little Mafia "ability" he has... that doesn't concern you, Lab?


Not clearing Tex but I took it as experience in the game,not a slip up though I could see someone thinking that.

Aren't you the one that was worried about the mafia grabbing onto something small and running with it?
 
Good grief. That was alot of reading. 7 pages.

Sorry for my lack of participation thus far. This has been a weekend from hell.

I promise to stop letting RL get in the way of the game.

My thoughts so far:

Dawg- something doesn't sit right with me, the way he seemed to be pushing for FF early is bugging me. Seemed like he was going after a convienient target.

DD- has alot of posts, but they're all airy and fluffy, like a marshmallow. Not her usual playstyle IMO.

Tex- I agree with ZS on this one, has posted next to nothing. While it may be that he just isn't interested in the game because he didn't get a role, lets not forget last game he also seemed disinterested, and he did have a role. I would not be suprised if he is a scumbag.

I will reread the thread and post some thoughts after I make the girls breakfast and drive the "sleepovers" home. I'm sure I missed stuff the first read through.

I vote to lynch Dawg.

Subject to change pending a more thorough reading of the thread.
 
See, the problem with the whole connection thing is that I'm pretty sure FF interpreted JL's post correctly. Yet you still seem to think it came from an offsite chatroom. That is what bothers me in particular. As I said with Dag, I can understand suspecting FF for all the insanity he has posted. But to keep pushing something like this with no basis at all is scummy. I believe I asked that there was anything other than that one post that connects JL and FF...it seems that is the only post, which in no way connects the two...unless you would like to reinterpret that post for us all.
Let's not forget no one is communicating now, but also we have innocent communicative roles.
Ice, the reason I got so worked up about it is because I truely feel like I am posting along in the conversation when I have a thought.... and then it seemed as soon as you mentioned "fluff", a couple people seemed to take that and run with it. If we are all talking about the same thing, why are mine pointed out as the ones that have no real basis? There is not much else to consider or suggest about that everyone or those that are indeed posting to pose suspicion about.
DD glad its you being called fluffy this game and not me :P But honestly, last game when I was called fluffy I redoubled my efforts to be more helpful. This game you were called fluffy and you've spent a lot of time combating the word fluffy. All I am saying is less defense and more offense is what finds scum.
What strikes you as scummy strikes me as noob play. He royally messed up his prior game, I think he was trying not to mess up again.
Sure it could be noob play, but it wasn't so much the lack of posting as the seemingly piggy back play that pinged the scum-dar. A few more posts of original content would go a long way in me moving Tex from scum to noob. But so far all I have seen is an effort to prevent UD.
 
AquariaCentral.com