Mafia #67 - 50/50 -- The Play

Ok just got home. I'm going to read over today and answer or pull posts that I have questions about as I go so its not 1 huge post. Bare with me if its been answered already.
 
Are you saying that obtaining information from a lynch is more important than lynching scum?

Whose lynch do you feel would provide you with the most information, and why?


I'm glad you asked JB this question as I was about to also. It bothered me in the same way that Lab was trying to say we learn something from FF if he is mafia but not if he is innocent.
Now I must ask why didn't you ask Lab the same question if it was important enough to ask JB.
 
Sorry I haven't been around, (it is tough to think about coming to the game thread with Kashta half drunk and half naked next to you on the sofa) :thumbsup:

Anyway, I am a little concerned here with the way this day has gone. First of all, history has a way of repeating itself unless we can learn from it.

Last game I was accused of being preoccupied with FF and got my teeth kicked in for it. This game everyone is jumping on Labbys band wagon.

lets look at history. Day 1 lynches have been what? INNOCENTS do we want to repeat that on this game?

Yes FF did get very confusing, we are talking about FF here.

Yes he did contradict himself. (see above)Re read the thread, he didn't get contradictory to himself or sound scummy until under the gun from LR. Who, by the way, gets the same way when she is under the gun.

I don't agree Lr is looking at others as she claims. What I see is LR campaigning to get FF lynched.

Just my own half drunk and over tired observation.

Since I do need to get up early for work, I need to vote now.

I vote to lynch LR

It seems to me that she found an easy day one target and wants to run with it.

This post is worthless without pictures lol
 
First of all, I know that Labby isn't an IW this game, there may be some things I miss but I am not that dense, but thank you for the hit up on the lack of confidence in my theories or thoughts. My point was that her "play" is very different than it was last game and Labby already explained that. I don't need additional comments and additional explanations from some peanut gallery... but thanks anyway....

you sure are quick to defend her though.... how about others who are playing "differently" from the last game or other games before this? Why does the pointing out of this bother you about Labby and no one else that's accused of not playing the same?

As far "me questioning Labby's ability to think about all possibilities", this is something Labby does or has done in other games as an innocent or helper of the town.... and I pointed it out that it seems to be missing from this game.

Since there isn't much to look through in your posts, I have found that even YOU have even mentioned a player's actions of last game... which now peaks my interest even moreso on why you seem to be lying down a defense for Lab.



I see you questioning Lab and Dag but at this point I see your vote is still besides them. Are you planning to change it or is this a distancing ploy?
 
It's always about interpretation.

Interesting that you feel that an FF lynch yields no information, yet the simple act of wanting to lynch FF is quite telling. How does that work?


Again this leads me to ask, why haven't you asked Lab the same question.
 
I don't see why everyone is saying I've gone sooooo hard at FF. He said something scummy, I questioned it, he said something scummier, wash rinse repeat. For those who "can't" see that he's said something scummy, I ask you to take off your rose colored glasses, unless you're defending your scummy teammate.

At this point, I'm pretty convinced JB and Ice are scummy. JB has been consistently inconsistent in his arguments about keeping FF around and how great it would be for the town. Ice has not been his typical self and I find it very odd that he's been defending FF. Very un-Ice like.

For those of you who want to lynch me, ask yourself if you're comfortable voting alongside scum, because that is what you're doing.


Tell me how I am being un-Ice like... Always bothers me when the best excuse someone can use for suspicion is they aren't playing like themselves.
 
The fact that FF is still alive in this game confirms that he is lying about his role as Non-communicating innocent.

The rule specifically states "No Role Claiming" and FF claimed a role. We've already established during our Serial Bomber discussion that role claiming leads to a mod-kill, right?

The fact that Dawg has posted since FF's claim would suggest that he's seen the claim. Then why is FF still alive? Because he didn't claim his actual role. No other explanation... FF is NOT an NCI, FF is a liar.

Or Dawg knows FF isn't that bright and feels bad for him.

I took that rule to mean you can't claim any role. So to say he isn't that one thing isn't correct either.The rule doesn't say you can't claim your role.

If Dawg feels its a violation he should take him down.
 
Knowing Ice's recent track record, I am all for him being un-Ice like. Now if we can only get FF to be un-FF like. :lipssealedsmilie:
 
AquariaCentral.com