Mafia #69: Ghost Hunters Game Thread

Wizard, my only point earlier is that there are a lot of references to older games, and being a different game there are different scum this time around. Older games are moot... IMO
 
Wizard, my only point earlier is that there are a lot of references to older games, and being a different game there are different scum this time around. Older games are moot... IMO

You are right. After rereading your original question, because I thought I had answered it, I see that I misread your question.

To answer your question correctly, it goes to the way a person plays, or their own style so to speak, as we have seen mentioned about FF for example.

Each person has a style of play that they use depending on role assignments.

The best players can play the same way regardless of role.
 
Guess, this goes to you "skimming" I answered you on each post. Here we go again I guess, then on to other things (it is funny how you want to bring it to light again though). YOU DID CONTRIDICT YOURSELF. YOU DON"T POST MUCH OF ANYTHING, YOU POST MORE JOKES THEN ANYTHING, YOU CALL OTHERS OUT FOR NOT SAYING MUCH WHILE YOU YOURSELF ARE SAYING NOTHING.
After the nightfall we had, this is what you want to post on your first post for day two...nothing at all about the actual nightfall, or what happened before?


Pt 1 - Contradicting self - Sorry, I don't know how I can make that one much more plain. I really really really didn't contradict myself. Both statements were unrelated. Are you saying that it is impossible for a person to be unaware of how busy their day will be, while at the same time getting a vote in early to make sure that I do not miss it? To me, these actions reinforce one another. I did not know how busy my day would be, and was worried I might not be available to wait until time was closer SO I put in a vote early, with the understanding that if my day was not busy and I had time later, I could return, reread posts, and change it.
You are going to have to explain to me the contradictory nature of these two actions.

Pt 2 - Not posting much of anything. At the writing of this statement, I have 35 posts. This places me near the middle of the pack.

Pt 3 - Posting more jokes than anything. Lets assume we have 3 categories of posts. Related (That is, directly related to trying to figure out scum), Unrelated (That is, related to the game or something someone said, but not directly related to finding out who is scum), and joke (That is, unrelated to the game, superfluous posts). Posts consisting solely of lolcats will be considered joke posts, whether or not I felt it was relevant. By my tally, I find 21 related posts, 8 unrelated posts, and 6 joke posts. Even if you combine the joke and unrelated posts, my related posts still outweigh them.

Pt 4 - Calling out others while saying nothing. See Pts 2 and 3.

Regarding you last question, yes. Yes it is.
 
Pt 1 - Contradicting self - Sorry, I don't know how I can make that one much more plain. I really really really didn't contradict myself. Both statements were unrelated. Are you saying that it is impossible for a person to be unaware of how busy their day will be, while at the same time getting a vote in early to make sure that I do not miss it? To me, these actions reinforce one another. I did not know how busy my day would be, and was worried I might not be available to wait until time was closer SO I put in a vote early, with the understanding that if my day was not busy and I had time later, I could return, reread posts, and change it.
You are going to have to explain to me the contradictory nature of these two actions.

Pt 2 - Not posting much of anything. At the writing of this statement, I have 35 posts. This places me near the middle of the pack.

Pt 3 - Posting more jokes than anything. Lets assume we have 3 categories of posts. Related (That is, directly related to trying to figure out scum), Unrelated (That is, related to the game or something someone said, but not directly related to finding out who is scum), and joke (That is, unrelated to the game, superfluous posts). Posts consisting solely of lolcats will be considered joke posts, whether or not I felt it was relevant. By my tally, I find 21 related posts, 8 unrelated posts, and 6 joke posts. Even if you combine the joke and unrelated posts, my related posts still outweigh them.

Pt 4 - Calling out others while saying nothing. See Pts 2 and 3.

Regarding you last question, yes. Yes it is.

I wasn't ignoring you just answering other questions posted to me, as I have answered your questions.

To touch on point 2 in the post I quoted, maybe you are just confused a little.

The number of posts is a moot point. It is the content of the post, that is, what it does for the good of the town that counts.
 
I wasn't ignoring you just answering other questions posted to me, as I have answered your questions.

To touch on point 2 in the post I quoted, maybe you are just confused a little.

The number of posts is a moot point. It is the content of the post, that is, what it does for the good of the town that counts.

Where did you answer my question, specifically the first one, which is about your supposed contradiction? Apparently it was dire enough to make you switch your vote to me, and I am not able to find where you answered how it is contradictory.
Content of posts is addressed in Pt 3. Just because I am not flailing about in the bushes like a drunk leprechaun and making 3 billion posts to cover every minutely unimportant detail does not mean that I am not contributing. Also, just because I am not serious 24/7 does not make me scum either.
Could you please post where you quoted and answered my question? You too Lady. I may well be missing it, but I am not finding it as I look back.
If it is the content of the posts that matter so much, Wiz, why not vote off ILM? Why target me?
Not every single one of Lady's posts is serious. Should we be looking into her?
I just find it odd that she sided so quickly with you based on faulty logic, and IMO, the both of you have been carefully side stepping my questions.
I might be looking at nothing, it just seems scummy to me.
 
Where did you answer my question, specifically the first one, which is about your supposed contradiction? Apparently it was dire enough to make you switch your vote to me, and I am not able to find where you answered how it is contradictory.
Content of posts is addressed in Pt 3. Just because I am not flailing about in the bushes like a drunk leprechaun and making 3 billion posts to cover every minutely unimportant detail does not mean that I am not contributing. Also, just because I am not serious 24/7 does not make me scum either.
Could you please post where you quoted and answered my question? You too Lady. I may well be missing it, but I am not finding it as I look back.
If it is the content of the posts that matter so much, Wiz, why not vote off ILM? Why target me?
Not every single one of Lady's posts is serious. Should we be looking into her?
I just find it odd that she sided so quickly with you based on faulty logic, and IMO, the both of you have been carefully side stepping my questions.
I might be looking at nothing, it just seems scummy to me.

I don't side step questions, that would be JL's bit. I am not about to go back through over 450 posts just to find the ones that you can't find.

I don't have time for that as I have other things to look at and other posts to pull to continue on with the game.

I had RL things I was dealing with at start of game and so skimmed to make some relevant posts.

Now I am trying to stay current and intend to continue to do so.
 
If you truly feel that that makes me scum bio, then by all means leave your vote where it is.
 
Where did you answer my question, specifically the first one, which is about your supposed contradiction? Apparently it was dire enough to make you switch your vote to me, and I am not able to find where you answered how it is contradictory.
Content of posts is addressed in Pt 3. Just because I am not flailing about in the bushes like a drunk leprechaun and making 3 billion posts to cover every minutely unimportant detail does not mean that I am not contributing. Also, just because I am not serious 24/7 does not make me scum either.
Could you please post where you quoted and answered my question? You too Lady. I may well be missing it, but I am not finding it as I look back.
If it is the content of the posts that matter so much, Wiz, why not vote off ILM? Why target me?
Not every single one of Lady's posts is serious. Should we be looking into her?
I just find it odd that she sided so quickly with you based on faulty logic, and IMO, the both of you have been carefully side stepping my questions.
I might be looking at nothing, it just seems scummy to me.
Sorry Bio, I am done with this. I answered you, I'm not going to go back looking for the posts if you want to be my guest. There is to much going on and to much that needs to be kept up with to spend my time RE answering you. What this looks like to me is you are trying to draw attention away from someone and keep others focused on stuff that has already been adressed.
The fact you have no comment what so ever about nightfall, what happened before, or after instead you choose to focus on something that has already been drug threw the dirt over and over brings you up even farther IMO.
Who you trying to protect here Bio, you know others were looking more scummy but you have definately grabbed my attention again.
 
Pt 1 - Contradicting self - Sorry, I don't know how I can make that one much more plain. I really really really didn't contradict myself. Both statements were unrelated. Are you saying that it is impossible for a person to be unaware of how busy their day will be, while at the same time getting a vote in early to make sure that I do not miss it? To me, these actions reinforce one another. I did not know how busy my day would be, and was worried I might not be available to wait until time was closer SO I put in a vote early, with the understanding that if my day was not busy and I had time later, I could return, reread posts, and change it.
You are going to have to explain to me the contradictory nature of these two actions.

Pt 2 - Not posting much of anything. At the writing of this statement, I have 35 posts. This places me near the middle of the pack.

Pt 3 - Posting more jokes than anything. Lets assume we have 3 categories of posts. Related (That is, directly related to trying to figure out scum), Unrelated (That is, related to the game or something someone said, but not directly related to finding out who is scum), and joke (That is, unrelated to the game, superfluous posts). Posts consisting solely of lolcats will be considered joke posts, whether or not I felt it was relevant. By my tally, I find 21 related posts, 8 unrelated posts, and 6 joke posts. Even if you combine the joke and unrelated posts, my related posts still outweigh them.

Pt 4 - Calling out others while saying nothing. See Pts 2 and 3.

Regarding you last question, yes. Yes it is.
YAY you, you have 35 post...I'm proud. You sure seem worried about post counts, really means nothing in the end, we've had scum be the highest posters, the lowest posters, and the mid ones too...proves nothing. I'd be willing to bet in the 21 "related" posts most all of them were questions being asked over and over after they had already been answered, lets see you have what at least 3 in this section alone that just rehash the same thing over and over
 
AquariaCentral.com