Mafia #7 -- The Play

Nope, if you're innocent then we're butting heads. If not, I think you're leading folks around with only your reputation and quoting abilities. Feel free to join the train. I'm still not changing my vote. Are you all so protective because I've found your Don? Great teamwork though.

Reputation and quoting abilities? :) I know I'll sound like Ogre here, but nobody listens to me...if they did you would have been gone last night. As far as quoting abilities, I simply posted what you said.

You don't think that I should find it the least bit suspicious that Z and Ice were all over 'clusters' at the same time you were? Even if you claim that you weren't with Z and Ice, but were 'clustering' out on your own, why did you stop? If you thought it was such a valuable investigative tool I would think that you would keep using it... I'm surprised that you'd let Z's and Ice's deaths discourage you.
 
Without a shred of my own thought?! I resent that. I even explained my reasoning in semi-small words....If this wasn't the internet I'd storm off in a huff.....

Posts 851 & 852. I'm not gonna try to multi-quote again tonight. As for semi-small words, use them if you need to, but they're not required on my side. Are you really that arrogant now that you've managed to fly below the radar for so long?
 
Reputation and quoting abilities? :) I know I'll sound like Ogre here, but nobody listens to me...if they did you would have been gone last night. As far as quoting abilities, I simply posted what you said.

You don't think that I should find it the least bit suspicious that Z and Ice were all over 'clusters' at the same time you were? Even if you claim that you weren't with Z and Ice, but were 'clustering' out on your own, why did you stop? If you thought it was such a valuable investigative tool I would think that you would keep using it... I'm surprised that you'd let Z's and Ice's deaths discourage you.

Like I said... it was a very "logical case". I used the wrong word (I do work in wireless so it's a pretty common term) and it was early, but that was enough for you. As far as why I stopped, I haven't. I'm still trying to figure out what pattern everyone could fit into with the "New" and "Old" mafia, but I'm dang sure not gonna post any thoughts about it until I think it's solid now.
 
And yes, you do sound quite a bit like Ogre...
 
I've wondered for a while now HN, is riding one candidate the whole game a calculated strategy or one you decide on night per night. You harbor so much on the idea that things should be done for the town but so far you have not been on any votes that the town were on. You;ve "safely" voted for your own person that you knew no one else was going for and never agreed with any other townies by the time nightfall came. Was this so that you could later accuse everyone of not seeing your point of view or was it so that you could say you didn't vote for the innocent with everyone else. You accuse people with low post counts of being guilty, but by my observation sploke also had a pretty low post count, overall. Zsand also had a huge post count and was the Don. I don't see an overly effective method to your reasoning. You jumped on the idea of clusters, so did ZSand and once again he was the don. I'm not sure why you think you're so trustworthy that you shouldn't be suspected. As far as I'm concerned the investigations by KOTD are the only thing I mostly trust right now. You've created long cases against most everyone here, but yet you vote only one direction every time when the person that's getting voted most likely appeared on your list, why is that?
 
Hn you posted 3 separate times your suspcions of dc last night/this morning (don't remeber exactly when). One was before you voted him but were thinking about it, then in your list after deciding to change votes to dc because he was a better suspect, and the last post about the whole thing with mad and the votes...all different reasons... notposting when browsing the forum, no posting unless put in the spot, and the vote timing...care to explain why all in different posts?
 
I've wondered for a while now HN, is riding one candidate the whole game a calculated strategy or one you decide on night per night. You harbor so much on the idea that things should be done for the town but so far you have not been on any votes that the town were on. You;ve "safely" voted for your own person that you knew no one else was going for and never agreed with any other townies by the time nightfall came. Was this so that you could later accuse everyone of not seeing your point of view or was it so that you could say you didn't vote for the innocent with everyone else. You accuse people with low post counts of being guilty, but by my observation sploke also had a pretty low post count, overall. Zsand also had a huge post count and was the Don. I don't see an overly effective method to your reasoning. You jumped on the idea of clusters, so did ZSand and once again he was the don. I'm not sure why you think you're so trustworthy that you shouldn't be suspected. As far as I'm concerned the investigations by KOTD are the only thing I mostly trust right now. You've created long cases against most everyone here, but yet you vote only one direction every time when the person that's getting voted most likely appeared on your list, why is that?

I did this exact same thing with dc last game and it worked for a very long time...well except I didn't come out and blame people for innocent trains on night 1 and also claim that I knew that they weren't mafia all along...that wouldn't be smart:p:
 
I've wondered for a while now HN, is riding one candidate the whole game a calculated strategy or one you decide on night per night. You harbor so much on the idea that things should be done for the town (I do) but so far you have not been on any votes that the town were on (my fault, but I've voted my concious and not for any innocents). You;ve "safely" voted (if they were safe I wouldn't have all the votes) for your own person that you knew no one else was going for and never agreed with any other townies by the time nightfall came. Was this so that you could later accuse everyone of not seeing your point of view or was it so that you could say you didn't vote for the innocent with everyone else. (I've voted what I've believed.) You accuse people with low post counts of being guilty, but by my observation sploke also had a pretty low post count, overall. Zsand also had a huge post count and was the Don. I don't see an overly effective method to your reasoning (Z did have me fooled, but again like I said previously... it wasn't about post count alone, but substance). You jumped on the idea of clusters, so did ZSand and once again he was the don. I'm not sure why you think you're so trustworthy (obviously no one does, so why say this?) that you shouldn't be suspected. As far as I'm concerned the investigations by KOTD are the only thing I mostly trust right now. You've created long cases against most everyone here (Nope only a couple), but yet you vote only one direction every time when the person that's getting voted most likely appeared on your list, why is that?

Once you lynch me, who will you be on to next?
 
Hn you posted 3 separate times your suspcions of dc last night/this morning (don't remeber exactly when). One was before you voted him but were thinking about it, then in your list after deciding to change votes to dc because he was a better suspect, and the last post about the whole thing with mad and the votes...all different reasons... notposting when browsing the forum, no posting unless put in the spot, and the vote timing...care to explain why all in different posts?

Because they happened at different times.
 
Also, Mad has hung me and others have quickly followed based on my use of the word "clusters". I used it once I believe, post 280ish. That is why I mentioned the willingness to follow.
 
AquariaCentral.com